CHAIRMAN of the Judicial Commission (KY) Amzulian Rifai held a meeting with Attorney General Sanitiar Burhanuddin at the Indonesian Attorney General’s Complex, Jakarta, Tuesday (12/11). The meeting took place in the middle of the investigation into a case of alleged bribery and/or gratification which involved three judges at the Surabaya District Court (PN) as suspects in connection with the murder case committed by Ronald Tannur.
After meeting Burhanuddin, Amzulian emphasized that his party’s authority could only investigate ethical violations by members of the judiciary. During this meeting, he said that often investigations carried out by KY found criminal elements. However, Amzulian admitted that his party could not investigate this matter.
“Sometimes during an examination of the ethical area, there are actually things that we believe are criminal in nature. But, when we feel that it is criminal, our authority does not extend to that,” he explained.
Therefore, the meeting with the Attorney General is a moment for the KY to mitigate if it finds suspected criminal acts when examining individual judges. According to Amzulian, Burhanuddin has expressed his willingness to follow up on the results of the KY examination at a later date.
“We will convey follow-up if the results of the examination are criminal. The Attorney General is pleased to follow up later if there are criminal matters,” said Amzulian.
It is known that JAM-Pidsus investigators have named six people as suspects in cases of alleged bribery and/or gratification related to case management, including three Surabaya District Court judges, namely Erintuah Damanik, Mangapul, and Heru Hanindyo.
The other three suspects are former Head of the Legal and Judicial Training Agency of the Supreme Court (MA) Zarof Ricar, Ronald’s lawyer named Lisa Rachmat, and Meirizka Widjaja as Ronald’s mother.
Erintuah, Mangapul, and Heru handed down a verdict of acquittal against Ronald at the first instance court. Meanwhile, at the cassation hearing, Ronald’s case was tried by Supreme Court justices Soesilo, Ainal Mardhiah, and Sutarjo.
Separately, Burhanuddin emphasized that his party would follow up on the report submitted by KY. If the results of the KY’s examination of individual judges are deemed accurate, investigators, continued the Attorney General, will investigate them.
He also said that he would not feel uncomfortable if he investigated a case involving a supreme judge at the Supreme Court. (P-5)
#Meeting #Attorney #General #Chair #Mitigation #Criminal #Findings #Judges
– How does the Judicial Commission (KY) typically approach cases that involve potential ethical violations versus criminal activity within the judiciary?
## Judicial Commission Grapples with Criminal Findings in Judicial Ethics
Today we’re joined by Professor Fulanah, legal expert and former KY member, to discuss a recent meeting between the chairman of Indonesia’s Judicial Commission (KY) and the Attorney General, brought into the spotlight amidst an ongoing case of alleged bribery involving judges in Surabaya.[[1](https://mediaindonesia.com/p/read/id/5808229/ketua-ky-temui-jaksa-agung-mitigasi-temuan-tindak-pidana-oleh-hakim)]
Professor, can you shed some light on the specific issues at play here?
**Professor Fulanah:** Certainly. The recent meeting highlights a long-standing challenge for the KY. While their mandate centers on investigating ethical violations within the judiciary, they often encounter situations where their investigations reveal evidence of potential criminal activity.
**Host:** And that’s precisely what happened in this case, right?
**Professor Fulanah:** Exactly. The KY is likely investigating the ethical aspects of the judges’ conduct, such as potential conflicts of interest or abuse of power. However, the allegations of bribery and gratification point towards potential criminal offenses that fall outside their jurisdiction.
**Host:** So what’s the solution?
**Professor Fulanah:** This meeting demonstrates the importance of collaboration between the KY and the Attorney General’s office. The KY can share their findings and observations with the AG, who has the authority to investigate and potentially prosecute criminal offenses.
**Host:** It sounds like a delicate balance between respecting the KY’s mandate and ensuring accountability for potential criminal behavior.
**Professor Fulanah:** Absolutely. It’s a continuous process of refining the lines of responsibility and communication between these institutions to ensure a fair and transparent justice system. This case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved and the need for a robust and collaborative approach to addressing potential misconduct within the judiciary.
Thank you for sharing your insights, Professor Fulanah.
**-End of Interview-**
