Green light in the Chamber, in the Senate, with 54 votes in favor and 85 abstentions, for the report of the Elections and Immunities Committee on the Calenda–Mastella case. The Chamber confirmed what was decided by the Council chaired by the dem, Dario Franceschini, in relation to the request of the Rome Prosecutor’s Office, which had asked the Senate for authorization to proceed against the leader of Action, after the complaint presented by the former minister Clemente Mastella. At the center of the clash between Calenda and the former Minister of Justice Mastella, the tweet of the leader of Action, who on 3 April last criticized on X Emma Bonino’s choice to create the United States of Europe list together with Matteo Renzi and to other centrists.
«It makes no sense to bring with you, even through a third party, Cuffaro, Cesaro and Mastella. The culture of the mafia is the opposite of European values”, were the words that followed Mastella’s legal action at the Rome prosecutor’s office. Last October 1st, the Senate council voted in favor of the proposal of the rapporteur Ada Lopreiato (M5S) against the unquestionability of Carlo Calenda in the dispute with Clemente Mastella, giving the green light to the authorization to proceed. The centre-left who voted in favor of the procedure on that occasion, as today in the Chamber, while the majority abstained, as also happened today. Previously, on 11 September, the council had heard from Calenda himself, who had maintained that the reference to mafia culture was not aimed at Mastella. «It was in Cuffaro, on which there is a ruling from the Supreme Court and there is no need for other explanations», he underlined, leaving the council offices in San Macuto.
#Mastella #lawsuit #Senate #proceed #Calenda #Tempo
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Sofia Romano on the Calenda-Mastella Case**
**Editor:** Today, we’re discussing the recent developments in Italian politics concerning the Calenda-Mastella case, especially after the latest decisions by the Chamber and Senate. Joining us is political analyst Dr. Sofia Romano. Thank you for being here, Dr. Romano.
**Dr. Romano:** Thank you for having me.
**Editor:** Could you briefly explain the significance of the Chamber and Senate’s recent approval regarding this case?
**Dr. Romano:** Certainly. The approval signifies a green light for legal proceedings against Carlo Calenda, the leader of the Action party, following a complaint by former minister Clemente Mastella. This entails a serious political clash, particularly revolving around Calenda’s criticism of amalgamations among centrist parties, which has caused a stir in political circles.
**Editor:** What sparked the conflict between Calenda and Mastella?
**Dr. Romano:** It all began with a tweet from Calenda on April 3rd, where he criticized Emma Bonino for collaborating with Matteo Renzi and other centrists to form the United States of Europe list. This criticism evidently struck a chord with Mastella, leading to the formal complaint and subsequent legal considerations.
**Editor:** The vote in the Senate showed a significant number of abstentions. What does this signify in terms of political dynamics within the legislature?
**Dr. Romano:** The 85 abstentions highlight a divided political landscape. Many senators may not feel strongly enough to take a definitive stance, potentially indicating a reluctance to engage in what could become a contentious legal and political battle. This reflects broader uncertainties within Italian politics, especially among centrist factions.
**Editor:** How do you foresee this situation impacting the future of Calenda’s political career?
**Dr. Romano:** This episode could either bolster Calenda’s profile as a defender of his party’s ideals or, conversely, damage his credibility if the legal proceedings turn against him. It certainly places him under scrutiny and may influence public and political opinion as he navigates this challenge.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Romano, for your insights. It’s clear that the Calenda-Mastella case is poised to have significant ramifications in Italian politics.
**Dr. Romano:** My pleasure! It will be interesting to see how this unfolds.