After being suspended by the courts on Thursday evening, the obligation to wear a mask outdoors in Paris remains applicable in many particularly busy places, where respect for barrier gestures is not guaranteed, announced the prefecture on Monday.
#COVID19 | New decree from the Prefect of Police on the obligation to wear a mask outdoors in Paris.
???? More information in our press release ⤵️ pic.twitter.com/P2TBYCHcY7— Prefecture of Police (@prefpolice) January 17, 2022
The new decree of the Paris police headquarters concerns:
- markets, flea markets, garage sales, unpacking sales
- gatherings, demonstrations, meetings or activities bringing together 10 or more people, organized on the public highway, whatever their purpose
- public transport waiting areas, in particular bus and tram stops and their immediate vicinity
- around train stations and shopping center entrances, during their opening hours
- the surroundings of schools or universities, when the public enters and leaves
- the surroundings of places of worship, when the public enters and leaves during offices and ceremonies
- the queues that form in the public space.
This obligation to wear a mask “takes effect immediately”, indicates the police headquarters to Parisian.
“An extremely high incidence rate”
“The current epidemic situation, with an extremely high incidence rate and a still very strong pressure on hospitalization, requires that measures be taken so that the outdoor space, however limited the risks, is not a place of contamination”, justifies the prefecture in a press release.
Similar decrees have been taken in all the departments of Ile-de-France, and checks by the police will be carried out accordingly, adds the prefecture.
Thursday, the administrative court of Paris had suspended the prefectural decree making it compulsory to wear a mask outdoors in Paris since December 31. This decision came the day following that of the Administrative Court of Versailles, which had suspended a similar decree, a first on national territory, considering that the measure carried “an excessive, disproportionate and inappropriate attack (…) on the freedom individual”.