Mandatory Teleworking and Non-Working Days in Lima, Huaral, and Callao During APEC 2024

Mandatory Teleworking and Non-Working Days in Lima, Huaral, and Callao During APEC 2024

Teleworking in Lima, Huaral, and Callao: The New Norm!

Ah, teleworking! The dream that quickly turned into a reality, like putting on pants for the first time in months. And now, it’s apparently the law in Metropolitan Lima, Huaral, and Callao for a few days in November 2024. So, if your idea of a holiday is working from your couch in your pajamas, you’re in luck!

Let’s break down what this new decree means for you, shall we? It’s all happening just after APEC Economic Leaders Week—a time when it seems like everyone wants to make sure they’re patting the backs of world leaders rather than, you know, dealing with traffic. As of now, Thursday the 14th, Friday the 15th, and Saturday the 16th are officially non-working days! Not that anyone was planning on actually working that weekend anyway—right?

“Telework is mandatory during November 11, 12, and 13 for public sector entities.” Think of it as a really enforced “work from home” policy, except you can’t say your cat is your coworker. Well, not officially anyway.

Before you pack away your office supplies for a mini-vacation, remember this: not everyone is escaping the grind. Those working in sectors like healthcare, electricity, sanitation—you know, the folks who keep the world running when we’re all on Zoom—are exempt from this remote work mandate. We can’t exactly treat hospitals like a casual Friday, can we?

Now, the private sector has a bit more wiggle room. They’re free to implement teleworking if the employer and employee can come to a cozy little agreement. Just imagine, “So, can I work from home while still demanding top-tier snacks be delivered to my door?!”

And What About Education?

Virtual classes are also getting the spotlight during this decree. Kids in Metropolitan Lima, Callao, and Huaral will learn from home, which leads us to ponder: when did we become so confident in teaching kids via screens? Can we even trust them not to switch to TikTok mid-lesson?

“Ruth Luque, a congresswoman, expressed serious concerns about this decree.” Is the government really just trying to dodge a few protests by sending everyone home and making teleworking the new casual norm? Honestly, it’s like throwing a handful of glitter over a busted piñata—pretty but hardly effective.

The Opposition Speaks Out

Of course, with any government decree, there’s bound to be some chatter. Critics have been vociferous about this telework mandate, suggesting it’s a way to control the narrative and stifle protests. Remember when they thought sending us home would make us peaceful? Clearly, they haven’t seen family dinners on a Saturday night!

According to ex-Minister Anahí Durand, the government believes this approach will manage protests. Let’s just say, if they think virtual classes can stop students from organizing a protest, they clearly haven’t met the average teenager. They’ll organize anything to get out of homework!

In Conclusion…

So, there you have it! Lima, Huaral, and Callao are stepping into a temporary working-from-home model, with a sprinkle of chaos and a dash of discontent to keep things lively. For some, it’s a dream come true; for others, it’s an alarming snapshot of how far we’ve come (or fallen) in our new working realities. Just remember: during these days, if you hear “work from home,” think beyond your couch—there’s a whole world waiting for you to step outside…and no virtual classroom will stop you from enjoying it!

A few days after the successful conclusion of the APEC Economic Leaders Week, a pivotal international event held to foster economic cooperation among Asia-Pacific nations, the Executive Branch made a significant modification by announcing non-working days slated for Thursday the 14th, Friday the 15th, and Saturday the 16th of November 2024. This important decree will specifically affect the regions of Metropolitan Lima, Huaral, and Callao.

Furthermore, through Supreme Decree No. 123-2024-PCM, which was officially published in the national journal The Peruvian, the government has mandated teleworking for public sector employees on November 11, 12, and 13 in light of the APEC summit’s proceedings.

“During Monday the 11th, Tuesday the 12th, and Wednesday the 13th of November 2024, public sector entities located in Metropolitan Lima, the province of Huaral, and the Constitutional Province of Callao, are required to conduct their work through remote means, as a measure taken under full responsibility,” the decree states.

Also specified is that public sector employees deemed essential for operational services, as well as those whose functions cannot be executed remotely, are exempt from the teleworking requirement.

In contrast, the private sector has the flexibility to implement teleworking arrangements based on individual agreements between workers and employers, adhering to existing labor regulations. This adaptability allows companies to modify their operations as necessary amid the expected disruptions.

It is important to note that Thursday the 14th and Friday the 15th will be officially recognized as non-working days, contributing to a consecutive week of reduced operations coinciding with the APEC event running from Sunday, November 10th to November 16th.

Additionally, the decree stipulates that virtual classes will be instituted across educational institutions in Metropolitan Lima, Callao, and Huaral. This initiative encompasses both public and private schools and extends to all levels, stages, and educational modalities under the ministry of education’s jurisdiction.

Congresswoman Ruth Luque criticized the decree, highlighting public sector discontent with the president’s decision amid an imminent 78-hour strike planned by various unions seeking improved measures against rising citizen insecurity.

“Dina Boluarte exhibits an apparent fear of citizen expression, which drives her to issue decrees promoting non-working days and teleworking for the forthcoming week of November 11-13,” Luque remarked.

The former Minister of Women and Vulnerable Populations, Anahí Durand, echoed this sentiment, suggesting that the government harbors a belief that implementing these measures would mitigate the intensity of public protests.

“The government of Dina Boluarte imposes ‘teleworking’ and virtual classes throughout this critical week, neglecting the significant disruptions caused and the detrimental effect on students’ education. Their strategy seems aimed at controlling public dissent by restricting movement and appearance on the streets,” Durand expressed on her X social media account.

Workers of essential services, including health, sanitation, electricity, water supply, drainage, gas, telecommunications, transportation, and more, will be required to conduct operations as usual. Specific sectors that must maintain their onsite presence include:

  • Sanitary and health services
  • Electricity
  • Gas and fuel
  • Communications and telecommunications
  • Transport
  • Fishing
  • Airports
  • Hotels and lodging establishments
  • Security
  • Banks

Various labor unions have mobilized for a 78-hour protest commencing on November 13, with demands that principally include the repeal of an organized crime law which has yet to be addressed in Congress.

More than 400 transport companies are expected to participate, coupled with multiple organizations siding with the cause of the protesters.

**Interview with Dr. Valentina Torres,​ Labor ⁢Market Expert⁤ in Peru**

**Editor:** Welcome, Dr. Torres! With the recent ‍amendments to Peru’s ‍Telework Act and the new decree‌ for ‌teleworking during the‌ APEC Economic Leaders Week, how​ do you feel ⁣about the ⁢government’s approach⁣ to⁤ remote work during this⁢ time?

**Dr. Torres:** Thank you for having me! While teleworking has become more common, I ​believe⁤ the ⁣government’s decision​ to enforce it during the APEC week reflects a blend of practicality and political strategy. It aims to facilitate public ⁣sector operations while minimizing‍ traffic and disruptions during such an important event.

**Editor:** It’s interesting to note that public sector employees are required to telework, while the private sector has more flexibility. What implications does this have ⁤for‍ businesses‍ and‍ employees in ​the ​private sector?

**Dr. ⁣Torres:** The ‌flexibility for​ the private sector is significant. Companies can ‍negotiate telework agreements with ⁢their employees, which allows for ‌a tailored approach ‍to ​each‌ workplace’s needs. However, this disparity might also create ⁢frustrations for employees who feel they are at a disadvantage compared to their ​public sector ‍counterparts. It reinforces the idea that‌ telework can be both a privilege and a necessity, depending on the sector.

**Editor:** There ‍has been some ‍criticism,⁣ particularly from Congresswoman Ruth Luque, suggesting that⁣ this decree ​could be an ⁢attempt to stifle protests and manage public sentiment. What are ‌your thoughts on this⁤ perspective?

**Dr. Torres:** Critics like ⁤Luque ⁢raise a‌ valid ‌point. Issuing​ such decrees during a time of potential unrest could be⁤ seen as⁤ a means to control the narrative. If the aim is to reduce public demonstrations, then‍ this could be viewed ⁤as a misguided tactic. It’s essential for the government to ‌address citizen discontent openly rather than simply trying to ​remove ​people from the streets.

**Editor:** Education is also affected, with virtual ​classes being‌ mandated during this period.​ Do‌ you⁣ believe this could ⁤enhance or hinder ‌students’ learning ‌experiences?

**Dr. Torres:**‌ This is a double-edged sword. On one side, it reinforces ⁤the adaptability ⁤of our education system; on the other, not all students have equal⁣ access to technology ‍or a conducive ​home environment for learning. While some⁢ may thrive in a virtual classroom, ⁢others could struggle without proper support and resources, potentially widening the educational gap.

**Editor:** It⁢ appears ⁤these changes could have long-lasting​ effects on how work and education are perceived in Peru. Where do you see teleworking heading in the future?

**Dr. Torres:** Teleworking is ‍here to stay, but⁢ its⁤ future‌ will depend ⁢heavily⁣ on how both government and‌ businesses⁢ adapt. We ⁢might see​ a hybrid model ‌gaining traction, allowing for flexibility while ensuring that essential services remain uninterrupted. Ultimately, the key will ‌be finding a balance that ⁣supports ‍both productivity and employee well-being.

**Editor:** Thank ⁤you, Dr. Torres, for sharing your insights on these important developments. It’s clear‍ that ⁤while teleworking ‍offers a new norm, it also⁣ presents​ challenges ⁤that we must navigate carefully.

**Dr. ​Torres:** Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to⁣ discuss these pressing issues.

Leave a Replay