The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI had filed bails in the Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and the burning of police vehicles at Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park. Apart from this, founder PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in jail for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed PTI founder’s detention in NAB custody from May 9 to 12.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life for the safety of the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What are the legal grounds the court cited for rejecting Imran Khan’s bail applications?
## Interview with Legal Analyst on Imran Khan’s Bail Rejection
**Host:** Joining us today is legal analyst, Alex Reed, to discuss the recent developments in the cases against former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan. Welcome to the show.
**Alex Reed:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** On May 9th, an Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore heard Imran Khan’s bail pleas in eight cases related to the May 9th protests. Could you give us an overview of the court’s decision?
**Alex Reed:** Yes, the court rejected Imran Khan’s bail applications in several key cases, including the attack on Jinnah House and the arson at the Shadman police station. This means he will remain in custody on those charges.
**Host:** Imran Khan’s lawyer, Barrister Salman Safdar, argued that the protests were a reaction to his client’s opinion and that the government had filed numerous charges without substantial evidence. What are your thoughts on those arguments?
**Alex Reed:** Barrister Safdar presented a strong case, highlighting the sheer number of cases filed against Mr. Khan and pointing out inconsistencies in the government’s allegations. He emphasized the lengthy duration of Mr. Khan’s imprisonment and argued for his release on bail. However, the court ultimately decided that there were sufficient grounds to keep Mr. Khan in detention pending further proceedings.
**Host:** What potential legal challenges or appeals might Imran Khan’s team pursue now?
**Alex Reed:** Mr. Khan’s legal team could choose to appeal the court’s decision to a higher court. They may also seek to challenge the admissibility of evidence or argue for a speedy trial.
**Host:** This case continues to be closely watched both within Pakistan and internationally. What are your predictions for the future of these legal proceedings?
**Alex Reed:** This is a complex and politically charged case, and its outcome is difficult to predict. Much will depend on the strength of the government’s evidence and the effectiveness of Mr. Khan’s legal representation.
**Host:** Thank you for providing us with your insights. We appreciate your time.
**Alex Reed:** You’re welcome.
:strip_icc():format(jpeg)/kly-media-production/medias/5056529/original/046090900_1734523991-Galaxy_Unpacked_2025.jpg "Samsung to Unveil New Galaxy AI Features at Galaxy Unpacked 2025")
