The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI had filed bails in the Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and the burning of police vehicles at Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park. Apart from this, founder PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in jail for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed PTI founder’s detention in NAB custody from May 9 to 12.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life for the safety of the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What are the specific charges brought against Imran Khan in relation to the May 9th incidents?
## Imran Khan’s Bail Rejected: A Look at the Legal Uphill Battle
**Interviewer:** Joining us today is legal expert [Guest Name] to discuss the latest news regarding former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan. The Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore has rejected his bail applications in eight cases stemming from the May 9th incidents. Can you shed some light on the specifics of these cases and the court’s reasoning?
**Guest:** Absolutely. These eight cases involve allegations related to the violence and unrest that erupted following Mr. Khan’s arrest in May. The specific charges range from attacking institutions like Jinnah House to arson and the destruction of public property. The court, presided over by Judge Manzar Ali Gul, seems to have found sufficient evidence to warrant keeping Mr. Khan in custody while the investigations continue.
**Interviewer:** Mr. Khan’s lawyer, Barrister Salman Safdar, argued passionately for his release. What were the key points of his defence?
**Guest:** Mr. Safdar meticulously highlighted what he called a targeted and politically motivated campaign against Mr. Khan. He pointed to the sheer volume of cases – over 240 – filed against his client, arguing that they covered every conceivable allegation. He also emphasized Mr. Khan’s lengthy detention and urged the court to consider granting bail on humanitarian grounds.
**Interviewer:** Despite these arguments, the court ultimately sided with the prosecution. Do you see any potential avenues for Mr. Khan’s legal team to appeal this decision?
**Guest:** Certainly, Mr. Khan’s legal team has the right to appeal this decision to a higher court. However, the prosecution’s case appears to be strong, based on the evidence presented. The outcome of any appeal will likely depend on whether the higher court finds any procedural irregularities or new compelling evidence that casts doubt on the lower court’s decision.
**Interviewer:** This case appears to be far from over. What are your predictions for the next steps in this complex legal battle?
**Guest:** It will be a long and intricate legal process. The prosecution will likely focus on gathering more evidence and building a strong case for conviction. Mr. Khan’s defence team will continue to fight for his release, challenging the charges and seeking to expose what they believe to be a politically motivated prosecution. Ultimately, the fate of Mr. Khan will likely be decided by a lengthy and complex trial.
