The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI filed bails in Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and in Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park burning of police vehicles. Apart from this, founder PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in jail for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed PTI founder’s detention in NAB custody from May 9 to 12.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life to protect the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What are the potential implications of the bail rejection for Imran Khan’s legal standing and future prospects?
## Interview with Legal Expert on Imran Khan’s Bail Rejection
**Interviewer:** We’re here today with [Guest Name], a legal expert specializing in Pakistani law, to discuss the recent developments in the case of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. Mr./Ms. [Guest Name], the Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore has just rejected Imran Khan’s bail applications in eight cases related to the May 9th unrest. Can you shed some light on what transpired in court?
**Guest:** Certainly. On May 9th, Imran Khan’s lawyer, Barrister Salman Safdar, argued for his client’s bail in eight cases, including the Jinnah House attack and accusations of
arson and vehicle burning. His argument centered on the principle that the public’s reaction was a consequence of Mr. Khan’s expressed opinions and that numerous cases against him have been dismissed by lower courts, including a high-profile case involving the “Cypher” issue.
**Interviewer:** Mr./Ms. Safdar also mentioned inconsistencies in the government’s narrative regarding the events of May 9th.
**Guest:** That’s right. He pointed out that the government seems to contradict itself regarding the nature of the alleged conspiracy and emphasized the inclusion of Imran Khan’s wife, Bushra Bibi, in multiple cases. His main argument was that while accusing someone is easy, proving their guilt is far more challenging.
**Interviewer:** Despite these arguments, the court chose to reject Mr. Khan’s bail requests. What are the possible reasons behind this decision?
**Guest:** There are several factors that could have influenced the judge’s decision. The severity of the charges, including terrorism-related accusations, might have played a role. Additionally, the court might have considered the potential threat to public order if Mr. Khan were released on bail.
**Interviewer:** What does this rejection mean for Imran Khan’s future?
**Guest:** This further complicates Mr. Khan’s legal situation. He will remain in custody while his cases proceed through the courts. His defense team will likely appeal this decision, and the legal battle is expected to continue for some time.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mr./Ms. [Guest Name], for providing your insightful analysis on this complex case.
