Shortly following it is known verdict regarding the mother of Lucio Dupuy and his partner, both accused of murdering and torturing the five-year-old boy in La Pampa, the brother of Magdalena Esposito Valenti He broke the silence and said that “Magui” was no longer part of his family. Maximiliano described Lucio as “the son I don’t have” and, in dialogue with infobaeHe said that he keeps a lot of photos and memories with his nephew. Currently, she no longer feels that “Magui” is part of her family. “She stopped being my sister. Lucio was the son I don’t have.”
However, the relationship of Maximiliano Esposito He broke up with his sister long before that day of the murder. “The last time I saw her was when she left Lucio with Maxi (her paternal uncle). That was the last time I spoke. She stopped being my sister, ”she detailed.
The chats for the crime of Lucio Dupuy: from the claim for possession to “we are going to send a shit”
Regarding the trial, he did not want to give more testimony than the disappointment of Lucio’s life: “Regarding the trial, it is useless because Lucio is no longer here and we all know what they deserve. What really hurts me, and will hurt me all my life, is Lucio.”
“I want to remember my nephew kicking the ball or going around and eating ice cream. I’ll stick with that. I know one day I will find it,” she added.
Regarding the Dupuy family, Maximiliano Esposito account that Lucio’s paternal uncle, of the same name, was “the only family member who was always there for him. I will be grateful to him for the rest of my life.” But he immediately clarifies, without referring to anyone in particular: “There are many who miss him now, but when they were there they didn’t value him.. I might tell countless things regarding people who mourn him today, but I prefer to remember my nephew.”
Lucio Dupuy case: a neighbor gave details of the mistreatment suffered by the child before he died
The trial for the crime of Lucio Dupuy
Magdalena and her partner Abigaíl Páez might be sentenced to life imprisonment, accused of “seriously insulting sexual abuse due to the circumstances of realization with anal carnal access with an object; aggravated by having been committed by the ascendant; with the help of two people and taking advantage of living with the victim under 18 years of age; everything as a continued crime; in real competition with homicide qualified for being the ascendant, for cruelty and treachery ”.
The details of the autopsy that revealed torture, added to the chats between them talking regarding the beatings and punishments that the child received are the most emphatic evidence that weighs in the case. They will be the judges Alejandra Ongaro, Andrés Olié and Daniel Sáez Zamora who define if they are guilty or not, and then what sentence they will receive.
JD / ds
You may also like
