The head of the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance (UINP) Anton Drobovych said on the air of the telethon that he appealed to the Cabinet of Ministers to allocate at least UAH 1 million for the research program, in particular, based on the appeals of Polish citizens, transmits Interfax-Ukraine.
“I asked the government to allocate at least UAH 1 million for a separate program. So that we have a separate program for search works, in particular, if Polish citizens apply, we will try to help them,” Drobovich said.
He noted that for years the Polish side has not been able to launch either working groups or interdepartmental commissions, and Polish citizens are already “desperately turning to us directly.”
- On October 2, the UINP announced that they plan to conduct search operations for the victims of the Volyn tragedy in 2025.
- Recently, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Poland expressed its approval of the statement of the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance about the possibility of resuming work on the search and exhumation of the victims of the Volyn tragedy, which is a constant stumbling block in the relations between the two neighboring states.
- At the beginning of October in Poland, the Minister of Foreign Affairs Andrii Sybiga discussed “concrete technical, not political steps” regarding the exhumation of the victims of the Volyn tragedy. He noted that there should not be any political obstacles for this.
- Earlier, the Prime Minister of Poland, Donald Tusk, stated the need to resolve the historical contradictions between Ukraine and Poland in order for our country to move towards EU membership.
- Polish Foreign Minister Radoslav Sikorsky said that Ukraine should “solve the Volyn issue in a spirit of gratitude.”
- The head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, Andriy Sybiga, said that controversial issues of common history will be discussed.
Analysis: The Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance and its Quest for National Memory Preservation
As I delved into the recent news article about the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance (UINP), I was struck by the significance of this institution in shaping the country’s national identity. According to my research, the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance was established on May 31, 2006, as a special organ for the restoration and preservation of national memory of the Ukrainian people [[3]].
In recent times, the head of the UINP, Anton Drobovych, has made a public appeal to the Cabinet of Ministers to allocate funds for the preservation of national memory. This appeal highlights the institute’s ongoing efforts to come to terms with Ukraine’s complex past, particularly its totalitarian history.
Further research led me to the website of the Ukrainian Institute, where I discovered that it is a government agency responsible for implementing state policy related to national memory and overcoming Ukraine’s totalitarian past [[1]]. This mandate is crucial in shaping the country’s national narrative and promoting a more nuanced understanding of its history.
I also came across the Archive of National Remembrance, which appears to be a separate entity with a related mandate. According to its website, the Archive of National Remembrance aims to provide access to original cases with information from repressive bodies in one place [[2]]. This archive serves as a vital resource for researchers, historians, and the general public seeking to understand Ukraine’s complex past.
In analyzing the recent news article, it becomes clear that the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance is playing a vital role in shaping the country’s national identity. By advocating for the preservation of national memory and promoting a more nuanced understanding of Ukraine’s history, the institute is helping to foster a sense of shared citizenship and social cohesion.
The appeal by Anton Drobovych, the head of the UINP, highlights the need for continued support and resources to achieve this goal. As Ukraine continues to navigate its complex history and national identity, institutions like the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance and the Archive of National Remembrance will remain essential in promoting a more informed and nuanced understanding of the country’s past.
Conclusion
the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance and the Archive of National Remembrance are two institutions that are working tirelessly to promote a more nuanced understanding of Ukraine’s complex history. As the country continues to navigate its national identity, these institutions will remain crucial in shaping the national narrative and promoting social cohesion. The recent appeal by Anton Drobovych serves as a reminder of the importance of supporting these institutions in their quest to preserve national memory and promote a more informed understanding of Ukraine’s past.
