Leobersdorf mayor made money from deal for former concentration camp area

Leobersdorf mayor made money from deal for former concentration camp area

Mayor Andreas Ramharter’s real estate company (List Zukunft Leobersdorf) sold the property for 15.25 million euros and received an extra 1.34 million through reallocation, reported “WZ”, “Falter” and ORF. When asked, Ramharter defended the deal and saw no bias. Criticism came from several quarters.

According to reports, Ramharter’s holding company acquired the land in 2021 and sold it to a building contractor in two tranches over the following two years. The contracts contained two so-called purchase price improvements in connection with reallocations until the end of 2024 on the meadow – which was largely already dedicated to building land. A strip along the federal highway dedicated to public traffic should become a building site, and a second public traffic area should become a private road. Ramharter’s company committed to “actively pursue these rezonings in good faith and to support them in the best possible way,” as it was stated in both purchase agreements, according to reports.

“Attempts to bring about dialogue failed”

The reallocations were carried out with local council resolutions in 2023 and this year in September, and the mayor himself also agreed. “As the market town of Leobersdorf, we have dealt with the issue of bias on several occasions and also pay very close attention to compliance with the relevant legal requirements,” said Ramharter, according to the reports. The mayor confirmed on Wednesday when asked that there was no bias. He did not comment on purchase prices.

According to the media, the Mauthausen Memorial emphasized in a written statement: “Immediately after the planned use of the area for commercial purposes became known, the Mauthausen Memorial drew attention to the problem of commercial development.” But “repeated attempts to bring about a dialogue failed.”

“We handled it cleanly”

Ramharter, on the other hand, spoke of contact with the Mauthausen Memorial and the Federal Monuments Office: “We worked through it properly and always sought cooperation.” For example, ground radar surveys and explorations were carried out in the area. It was agreed not to build basements in order to preserve the foundations, said Ramharter. The designation as an operating area has existed for a long time. He also noted that several areas that served as camps during wartime had already been repurposed.

According to the reports, the Federal Monuments Office confirmed that it had held “discussions with stakeholders”. We have no influence on zoning. The area is not under monument protection. There are, among other things, the foundations of barracks on the grounds in Leobersdorf where the Hirtenberg concentration camp subcamp stood. “From the current perspective, these remains – even in comparison with other former, archaeologically identifiable camps that are under monument protection – are not sufficient within the meaning of the Monument Protection Act to place them under monument protection,” said the Federal Monuments Office, according to reports.

“Unbearable oblivion of history”

The SPÖ spokeswoman for the culture of remembrance, Sabine Schatz, described the construction plans on Wednesday as an “unbearable forgetfulness of history” and called for the project to be stopped. “The historical responsibility towards the victims of the Nazi era requires that these places be treated with respect,” said the member of the National Council in a broadcast. “The fact that profits were made by repurposing these areas has a very pale aftertaste.” She called for federal intervention to secure the site as a memorial site in the long term. SPÖ federal women’s chairwoman Eva-Maria Holzleitner believes it is important to “carry on the memory of the fate of women under National Socialism.”

“What we are observing here is a frightening example of how historically sensitive land is dealt with when economic interests are in the foreground,” criticized Helga Krismer, club leader of the Lower Austria Green Party, in a press release. The planned construction project is “an example of the worrying development of spatial planning” in the state: “It is particularly worrying that there are always people profiting from this development in the mayor’s environment.” Krismer announced an application to amend the Lower Austrian Spatial Planning Act, which provides for a ban on development on historically contaminated properties.

“Need for action regarding control mechanisms”

NEOS state party leader Indra Collini saw “an enormous need for action in the control mechanisms within municipalities” as well as the need to think about a stricter values ​​compass for mayors. “In the case of the Leobersdorf case, it will be necessary to examine exactly what the local council knew in this complex rezoning vote and what perhaps it did not,” she said in a broadcast.

“The questionable property deals show once again that there are massive structural problems in spatial planning,” WWF soil protection spokesman Simon Pories called for competence reforms as well as stricter laws and controls in a broadcast. In addition, it must be ruled out that mayors are allowed to work in the real estate or construction industry at the same time, because this opens the door to potential incompatibilities when rezoning.

The Future Leobersdorf list holds the absolute majority in the local council. In 2020, 53.30 percent was achieved. Local council elections will take place in Lower Austria in January 2025, and Ramharter will be the top candidate for the Future Leobersdorf list.

⁢ What steps ⁤is Mayor Ramharter taking to ensure historical sensitivity in the development of the ‍former ⁢concentration ⁤camp ⁢site?

###⁢ Interview with Mayor Andreas Ramharter

**Interviewer:** Thank⁤ you for joining ⁣us,​ Mayor Ramharter. ⁣Your recent real estate deal has garnered significant criticism. Can you clarify your involvement and address the concerns ​about potential bias?

**Mayor Ramharter:**⁣ Thank you‍ for having me. I want to emphasize that there has been⁣ no bias in this transaction whatsoever. The process has been fully ⁤transparent, and I assure you that all legal requirements were adhered to⁣ throughout.

**Interviewer:** The sale of the property for⁢ over 15 million euros, along with additional funds from reallocations, has raised eyebrows. How⁢ do you respond to accusations that this ‍deal might​ prioritize profit over historical ⁣sensitivity?

**Mayor⁣ Ramharter:** We took⁤ careful‍ steps to engage with relevant stakeholders, including⁣ the Mauthausen Memorial ‌and the Federal Monuments Office. We’re ‍committed to exploring and preserving⁢ the history⁣ of the⁤ site. Our agreements explicitly state ⁢that ‌we would avoid building basements to protect any existing foundations.

**Interviewer:** Despite‌ your claims of transparency, critics ‍argue that ‌the historical context of the ⁢land, once part of⁣ a concentration camp, is being ​overlooked. What ​are your‍ thoughts on this?

**Mayor Ramharter:** I understand those ‍feelings;‍ however, it’s important to note that the area is not currently under monument protection, as confirmed by the⁢ Federal Monuments Office. Historical‍ remembrance is crucial, and we believe that our planned development can coexist with this responsibility.

**Interviewer:** Several political​ figures, ⁤including SPÖ members, have called for federal intervention to secure the ⁤site as​ a memorial. Do you think that is a necessary step?

**Mayor Ramharter:** I appreciate the concerns, but it’s⁣ essential to strike a⁢ balance between development ‍and historical preservation. Our intentions are to⁣ honor ⁣the site’s past ⁣while also addressing the​ community’s⁢ needs for residential and ⁤commercial spaces.

**Interviewer:** Your political​ party holds a significant majority in the local council, raising questions about⁢ the influence of⁣ local‍ politics in this deal. How ⁤do ​you plan to address these perceptions and restore ​public​ trust?

**Mayor Ramharter:** Trust is ⁤earned​ through actions and transparency.​ Moving forward, we will continue to⁤ engage with the community, ‍invite dialogue, and ‍ensure that all​ decisions⁢ are⁤ made in the public interest. We welcome⁤ input ⁤from ‍all⁢ sides to ‍ensure this project honors our history while looking to‌ the future.

**Interviewer:** Thank you, Mayor Ramharter, ⁣for⁢ sharing your perspective⁢ on‍ this ‍complex issue.

**Mayor Ramharter:** ⁤Thank ⁤you for​ the opportunity⁢ to discuss this important ⁣matter.

Leave a Replay