Lawyer reveals Parina forest invasion case The fruit of the brave who died in the middle of the battlefield. Prepare to study the appeal
from the case of the Supreme Court Miss Parina Kraikup MPs for Ratchaburi, the Pracharath Party vacated office from 25 Mar. 64, which is the date of the Supreme Court’s order to stop performing duties. and to revoke the right to vote for 10 years and to revoke the right to stand in the election of the objector forever As a result, the protesters are not eligible to be elected as senators, senators, local administrators. and hold any political position According to the Constitution, section 235, paragraph four, and the National Anti-Corruption Act B.E. 2561, Articles 81, 87, and the ethical standards of judges of the Constitutional Court and independent organizations, Article 3, Article 17, and Article 27, paragraph two, the verdict to take effect immediately In the case of encroaching on the reserved forest area in Ratchaburi Province
On April 7, reporters reported that Miss Parena did not come to the court, only Mr. Thiwa Karnkrasang Ms. Parena’s lawyer came to hear the verdict.
Mr Tiwa said following hearing the verdict that Accepted the outcome of the verdict, but insisted that Ms. Parena did not invade the reserved forest in the first place. but the inheritance of the land from his father The aforementioned area was the land of the ALRO, with an area of 610 rai in 2012, and the court pointed out that Miss Parena is not a poor person. And not a person who is a farmer in occupation, so the possession of the land A large number of ALRO members cause disgrace to the members of the House of Representatives. that is a good example for the people
Mr Tiwa said that although Ms. Parena had already returned the land in 2019, Ms. Parena should have to give it back before she became a member of the House of Representatives, so it was assumed that the intention was to Occupying the land of the ALRO. Therefore, the people cannot be allocated the land in this section, so the court considers that it is a serious breach of ethics.
“Today’s judgment cannot be made. Miss Parena can be a politician. It is considered a citizen and has to rest for another 10 years. The part that says that political rights are cut forever Must see that the term political office holder What qualifications do you have? and if the right to be disqualified, MPs cannot hold political offices However, if the new constitution is amended Ms. Parena had the opportunity to return to the position once more. which now has to rest like Mr. Sira Chenjaka
“I want you to know that in the past Miss Parena got hit a lot. This was the fruit of a hero who died in the middle of the battlefield. is normal But heroes never die on the battlefield. This is Thai politics.” Mr. Tiwa said
Mr. Tiwa said that After hearing the judgment She did not talk to Ms. Parena, but Ms. Parena had prepared a new chicken farm. As for the matter of the case, it is necessary to see whether by law can appeal to the general meeting of the Supreme Court or not. If you can, try filing an appeal. in which general political criminal cases can be appealed but in the case of unethical behavior, it is the first judgment Therefore, it is necessary to study the law before using the same regulations or not.
Read related news.