Voting for second and fourth place on the Storting list for the Oslo Labor Party was due when the county team gathered for a nomination meeting in the traditional Samfunnssalen in Oslo on Tuesday evening. The members of the nomination committee have not agreed among themselves on who should have the safe second place, as well as fourth place on the list.
– We have not succeeded, admitted election committee leader Rina Mariann Hansen after giving an account of the considerable efforts the committee has made through many and long meetings to arrive at a unanimous recommendation for the Storting list.
The majority of the committee nominates Hadia Tajik for the safe second place on the nomination list. The minority wants Kamzy Gunaratnam. If Ap’s support remains at its current level at the election next year, the party is likely to get only three representatives from Oslo in the Storting.
– We have a small group of politicians in Norway who can face Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg in a debate and come out victorious. Hadia is one of them, said Hansen.
– On the whistleblower’s side
Hansen also pointed out that “there were few who stood as straight-backed” on the side of whistleblowers as Hadia Tajik when the metoo dispute ravaged the party. The then deputy leader of the Labor Party, Trond Giske, resigned in 2018 after several women reported him.
The party leadership concluded that Giske had broken the party’s guidelines against sexual harassment. Giske has contested this and also several of the notifications, but has also apologized for his behaviour.
Gunaratnam has the second place on today’s list and is nominated for the same place by the minority – consisting of one of nine members – on the committee.
– Who will take the fight for Oslo? The Oslo list is traditionally characterized by national politicians. Kamzy grew up in Groruddalen, is a popular Oslo politician, former deputy mayor and leader of Oslo AUF, said Laial Janet Ayoub.
Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre is, by all accounts, beaten into first place, and so is deputy leader Jan Christian Vestre in third place.
Completely even
Until recently, there was a dead heat between Tajik and Gunaratnam, according to him VG. Each of them received support from 105 delegates, the count the newspaper had carried out showed.
Gunaratnam is said to have led quite clearly earlier this autumn, with the support of more than twice as many delegates as Tajik. But Tajik is said to have taken the lead in recent weeks, the newspaper wrote.
As it is competitive voting, voting must be done in writing. It will make it easier for delegates to break with their local team and vote according to their own convictions. The counting and mapping of how the local teams are positioned is therefore fraught with uncertainty.
If there is a deadlock, there will be a new written vote. If it also ends in a tie, the nomination will be decided by drawing lots, the rules of procedure state.
National versus local
Tajik’s supporters have highlighted the difficult position she has had in the Labor Party as both deputy leader and minister and the implementation power she has to show time.
Gunaratnam’s supporters have been skeptical that there is a lack of local political voice if only candidates who are widely perceived as national politicians are elected. Some also have opposite The daily newspaper expressed skepticism that Tajik is “shopping counties” after she reported moving from Rogaland to Oslo.
In addition to the battle for second place, there are also two battles for fourth place.
Here, Agnes Nærland Viljugrein has the support of a majority in the nomination committee, while the minority wanted Trine Lise Sundnes.
Frode Jacobsen is set for fifth place on the list.
#Ready #battle #parliamentary #seats #Oslo #Labor #Party
What are the main arguments put forward by supporters of Hadia Tajik in the Oslo Labor Party nomination debate?
## Oslo Labor Party Nomination: A Divided Front
**Host:** Today we are joined by [Guest Name], a political analyst who closely follows Norwegian politics. Welcome to the show.
**Guest:** Thank you for having me.
**Host:** The Oslo Labor Party is gearing up for the upcoming elections, but it seems there’s some internal disagreement within the party about the candidate list.
**Guest:** That’s right. There’s a particularly heated debate about who should secure the coveted second position on the Storting list for Oslo.
**Host:**
Can you tell us more about the candidates involved and the reasons behind this division?
**Guest:** The main contenders are Hadia Tajik and Kamzy Gunaratnam. Both are accomplished politicians, but represent different styles and backgrounds. Tajik is seen as a strong debater with a national profile. As Rina Mariann Hansen, leader of the election committee, pointed out, she’s one of the few who can confidently take on seasoned debaters like Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg. [[(No source provided)]]
**Host:** Interesting! So, what about Gunaratnam?
**Guest:**
Gunaratnam is a popular local politician with deep roots in Oslo. She has served as deputy mayor and headed the Oslo AUF. Her supporters argue that she best represents the interests of Oslo residents. [ [(No source provided)]]
**Host:**
This division seems quite significant. Can you shed light on the factors contributing to this disagreement?
**Guest:** There seems to be a generational divide at play. Tajik is seen as representing the older, more established guard within the party, while Gunaratnam symbolizes a newer, more locally focused generation. Adding to the complexity, there’s a historical element too. Tajik gained significant recognition during the #MeToo movement within the party, defending whistleblowers against powerful figures. This resonates with some voters. [[(No source provided)]]]
**Host:**
This certainly paints a complex picture. What are the potential implications of this division for the Oslo Labor Party’s performance in the upcoming elections?
**Guest:**
A fractured party heading into an election is never ideal. It can lead to voter confusion and potentially split the vote. However, both candidates are popular and capable. Ultimately, the party’s success will depend on its ability to unite behind a common platform and effectively address the concerns of Oslo voters.
