Kremlin: NATO was created to maintain confrontation

Kremlin spokesman Dmitri Peskov assured in statements to the press that NATO has ratified that it is a bloc designed to maintain confrontation.

“The Atlantic Alliance confirmed once once more its essence. It is an alliance created in the era of confrontation to maintain confrontation. Well, he is fulfilling his functions,” he said.

Quoted by local mediaPeskov added that the documents signed at the summit show that NATO is not in favor of peace.

“We see that our opponents in Europe and the United States are not in favor of dialogue,” he said, highlighting that in the West there are authorities who have a more realistic point of view, but it is very difficult for them to make themselves heard.

Hysterical reaction to Russian contacts with NATO

The final declaration of the summit of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) held in Washington, United States (USA), shows the “hysterical reaction” of the bloc to the contacts that Russia maintains with various authorities and organizations, experts said.

Consulted by Sputnik, political scientist Yuri Svetov commented that the document reveals the position of NATO members regarding the relations promoted by President Vladimir Putin.

“These include meetings within the SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organization), the visit of (Indian Prime Minister Narendra) Modi, and contacts within the framework of Putin’s own trips,” he said.

Svetov considers that the NATO She is hysterical because it seems that “they have built a wall around Putin and it is not working. So they only have one thing left: the tone of ultimatum, these demands for peace.”

“Even more hilarious is this statement, in which they announce that they will arm Ukraine, establish their own order around the world, and take care of China and the Asia-Pacific region,” he added.

NATO shows no interest in negotiated solution to the conflict in Ukraine

For his part, the American economist and professor at Columbia University, Jeffrey Sachs, highlighted that the final declaration of the NATO summit does not show any interest in finding a negotiated solution to the conflict in Ukraine.

“It reflects zero interest or intention to find a negotiated solution to the Ukrainian conflict. “Instead, it emphasizes the irreversible course of Ukraine’s accession to NATO, which will never happen due to Russia’s opposition, thereby prolonging the current war recklessly and unnecessarily,” he said.

In addition, he indicated that blame for the conflict is attributed to Russia without taking into consideration the “2014 coup d’état in Ukraine, the failure of the Minsk agreements” and the expansion of the alliance.

“The NATO summit declaration is a strong neoconservative reaffirmation of commitment to American hegemony. “The document asks NATO to defend a ‘rules-based order’, which is actually an order created by the US that often directly contradicts the UN Charter,” the professor noted.

Asia-Pacific is not a field for geopolitical competition

For its part, the Mission of China Before the European Union (EU) he reiterated that the Asia-Pacific region is not a space for geopolitical competition and called on NATO not to become a disturber of peace.

“The Asia-Pacific region is a space for peaceful development, not a battlefield for geopolitical competition (…) We urge NATO to stick to its role as a regional defense organization in the North Atlantic,” he said. The mission.

As Chinese authorities have expressed on several occasions, the representation of that country urged the bloc not to be a “disruptor of peace and stability in the Asia Pacific nor a tool in the hands of a certain power that seeks to preserve hegemony.”