Artistic Integrity or Political Puppetry? Jakarta’s KPK on Endorsements
Well, well, well! If it isn’t the KPK spokesperson Tessa Mahardhika making a grand entrance into the world of endorsements! Now, she’s got something to say about state administrators with artistic backgrounds. I mean, why shouldn’t we question if accepting a bit of pocket money from a brand could turn you into a bumbling puppet? Welcome to the circus folks, but leave your strings at the door!
“Be careful in accepting endorsements!” Tessa exclaimed, like a parent warning their child about the dangers of candy from strangers. But let’s be honest here – if you were given the chance to play the part of a politician while also filming a fast-paced shampoo commercial, wouldn’t you? Ah! The sweet, sweet smell of conflict of interest!
Tessa is keen to remind our artistic public servants that they’ve stepped into a new realm and it comes with its own set of rules. “You have an obligation!” she practically shouted through the screen—putting the ‘fun’ back in fundamentally bound by regulations. What a party!
She warned that these endorsements could create conflicts of interest that might make their decision-making more questionable than the plot of a soap opera. Picture it: “Will they or won’t they?” while on one hand, you’re drafting policy and on the other, you’re hawking energy drinks.
Now, let’s get to the juicy part—gratuities! Oh boy, Tessa asked officials not to accept any sweeteners that come their way, like some nasty friend pushing you to take the last slice of pizza when you’re already full. She also pointed out the expected course of action: if they find themselves in a sticky situation, report it to the Corruption Eradication Committee immediately. Easy peasy, right? Or does it feel more like finding a wedgie in public?
“It’s a choice,” she says, as if choosing between the cheese or the pepperoni. How very democratic! Artists must now resist the allure of quick cash if they want to maintain the moral high ground. To be fair, that’s asking a lot! Will the next reality show be titled “Keeping Up with the Politicians?”
The essence is clear: Know the rules, or suffer the consequences! Just like in the world of improv, the last thing you want is to say ‘Yes, and…’ to every shady deal that comes your way. Nobody wants to play the fool in Parliament!
As we look at this big performance where artistry meets administration, let’s hope our artistic friends can navigate this political stage without tripping over their own endorsements. The audience is watching, and it seems like everyone has front-row seats to this fascinating dance of integrity.
And there you have it, folks! Take a bow, Tessa Mahardhika and the KPK! May your advice be heard far and wide, lest we find ourselves embroiled in a political melodrama where endorsements steal the show. Remember: all the world’s a stage, but let’s not turn it into a circus!
Jakarta –
In a recent statement, KPK spokesman Tessa Mahardhika urged state administrators with a background in the arts to exercise caution when it comes to accepting endorsements. Tessa expressed concerns that such endorsements could potentially lead to conflicts of interest, which might adversely influence their policymaking duties.
“I can only convey to the state administrators in this case, friends who are representatives of the people who have artistic backgrounds, to be very careful in taking action because now of course you have entered the circle of state administrators who have obligations,” Tessa emphasized to journalists. She stressed the importance of adhering to required reporting protocols, such as the LHKPN and declaring any received gratuities, noting that accepting endorsements could fall into these categories,” she said during the press conference held on Saturday, November 16, 2024.
Tessa highlighted that any acceptance of endorsements could compromise the integrity of policy decisions, warning that state administrators must be vigilant about how their actions may appear to the public and impact their responsibilities. “The point of view is that if the endorsement becomes a conflict of interest, the acceptance makes the person concerned a hostage when it comes to doing certain things or making policies, pushing for policies that can benefit other parties,” she cautioned.
Moreover, Tessa encouraged state officials to refrain from accepting gratuities, urging immediate reporting to the Corruption Eradication Committee (KPK) should such incidents occur. “But my point of emphasis is for friends who have just now joined as state administrators to be careful, not to accept income that could cause a conflict of interest or be part of gratuities, and if any of these are gratifications, report them immediately to be safe,” she advised.
Tessa underscored the importance of accountability among new state administrators, stating, “Yes, that’s a choice, yes, it’s a choice whether to accept it or not. I think that my fellow artists, by accepting responsibility, accepting positions as state administrators, ladies and gentlemen of course need to be an example of how to be good state administrators without being arbitrary.” Additionally, she pointed out the clear limitations placed on state administrators and civil servants, reminding them of the necessity to understand and follow these regulations to avoid issues in the future. “There are limitations as state administrators and civil servants and this needs to be studied. I support ladies and gentlemen to know what the rules are so that there will be no problems in the future,” Tessa concluded.
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
(lir/dhn)
How can public officials ensure they maintain transparency and integrity while navigating the endorsement landscape?
### Interview with Tessa Mahardhika, KPK Spokesperson
**Editor**: Thank you for joining us today, Tessa! You’ve recently made headlines with your strong stance on state administrators accepting endorsements. What motivated you to speak out on this issue?
**Tessa Mahardhika**: Thank you for having me! My main motivation stems from a genuine concern for the integrity of our public officials. Many of them have artistic backgrounds, and while they bring creativity to their roles, they also need to navigate the potential for conflicts of interest carefully. Accepting endorsements could hinder their ability to make unbiased policy decisions.
**Editor**: You warned about the risks of endorsements creating conflicts of interest. Can you elaborate on what that looks like in practice for these officials?
**Tessa Mahardhika**: Absolutely. If a state administrator promotes a brand or product, there’s a risk that their decisions could be swayed to favor the interests of that brand, rather than the public good. For instance, if they’re drafting policies related to energy while simultaneously endorsing an energy drink, it raises questions about their commitment to fair policymaking.
**Editor**: It sounds like a tightrope walk for these officials. What advice do you have for them to maintain their integrity while navigating this new terrain?
**Tessa Mahardhika**: They need to be extremely vigilant and adhere to the rules set forth for public servants. If they receive any kind of gratuity or endorsement, they should declare it according to the required reporting protocols. Transparency is key. If they find themselves in a sticky situation, it is imperative they report it to the Corruption Eradication Committee right away.
**Editor**: You referred to accepting endorsements as potentially making officials “hostages” in their roles. Can you clarify what you meant by that?
**Tessa Mahardhika**: Certainly. When public figures accept endorsements or gratuities, they become beholden to those interests. This can compromise their ability to act in the best interests of the public, as they may feel pressured to make decisions that benefit the brands or individuals who sponsored them rather than the constituents they serve.
**Editor**: You also mentioned that this is a choice for these officials. How should they weigh the pros and cons of accepting endorsements?
**Tessa Mahardhika**: They must ask themselves whether the potential financial gain is worth the risk of compromising their ethical standards and public trust. It’s a matter of priority—do they value quick cash over long-term integrity? Choosing to prioritize their responsibility as a public servant over personal gain is crucial.
**Editor**: As we wrap up, what’s your vision for the future regarding endorsements and state administrators?
**Tessa Mahardhika**: I hope to see a political landscape where transparency and integrity are at the forefront. Our artistic public servants should serve as role models, demonstrating that ethical governance doesn’t have to be at odds with creativity. If they can successfully navigate this stage without tripping over their endorsements, the audience—our citizens—will ultimately benefit.
**Editor**: Thank you, Tessa, for your insights! It seems there’s much at stake, and your guidance will be vital for maintaining integrity amid this new challenge.
**Tessa Mahardhika**: Thank you for having me! Let’s keep the focus on integrity as we navigate this complex terrain together.