2024-08-20 03:31:30
This publication understands that in recent months, the Beijing Inspection Bureau has interviewed in batches the grassroots civil servants and officials of the Metropolitan Development Bureau who handled and handled the Jinghua City case. In addition to the civil servants at all levels who handled the Jinghua City case during his tenure, some even reached the level of Hao Longbin. During the municipal government era, some civil servants still served in the Municipal Bureau, but many civil servants had already changed units and been transferred to other bureaus. Not only did they interview grassroots civil servants, they also interviewed scholars, experts and members of the original Metropolitan Review Committee in batches in the past half month. They even asked these scholars to spare a whole day and informed them that “the interview time will be from morning to Please help me tonight.”
Huang Shanshan (pictured) was not only involved in the prosecution of Ke Wenzhe’s false accounting case, but was also involved in the Jinghua City reconstruction and profit case, and became the target of the task force’s interview.
This publication understands that the prosecutors interviewed the civil servants who handled the Jinghua City case, and the focus of the clarification was whether there were instructions and pressure from the top at the grassroots level? Did the mayor’s office use any form of communication or pressure? And who gave instructions for the preparation and revision of relevant official documents that year?
According to people familiar with the matter, during the interview, the prosecutor once took out the key official documents of the Jinghua City case and asked different civil servants who handled the case at that time, “Were these opinions (contained in the official documents) instructed by someone? Who instructed to modify them in this way?” A civil servant directly told the prosecutor, “The superior above asked me to change it like this.”
Regarding the initial handling of the Jinghua City case, were there any officials who were concerned or put pressure on the case? This publication has learned that a civil servant testified during the interrogation that he “never directly received a call from the mayor (Ke Wenzhe)”, but “when I saw the letter of love from Jinghua City forwarded to me, I knew it was requested by the mayor’s office.” !”
Taipei City Councilor Ying Xiaowei (pictured) was suspected of lobbying for an employer in the Jinghua City reconstruction project to relax the plot ratio, and the prosecutor will summon her to explain.
It is understood that some civil servants have explained to prosecutors that there are two ways for public agencies to modify official documents. One is “withdrawal through face-to-face negotiation”, that is, the department head or section or unit chief interviews the civil servant responsible for the case. , hand over the opinions on revising the official document, and the civil servant will then modify the official document according to the superior’s opinions. The other is “withdrawal by oneself”, that is, the civil servant in charge withdraws the official document and rewrites it on his own. But many times, “The superior has asked us to talk.” After modifying the opinions, we are asked to withdraw and rewrite it ourselves, and the official document system will not fill in the withdrawal request!”
Not only that, when the prosecutor asked, in the city government’s experience in handling urban planning review cases, are concerns such as high-level submission of petitions a common rule or an exception? When a civil servant attended as a witness, he confessed that “it has never happened in the past” and said bluntly: “At least the cases I have handled in the past have not been like this (like Capital City)!”
In addition, this publication has learned that Beijing Inspection and Quarantine Bureau has conducted intensive interviews with members of the Metropolitan Committee, experts and scholars in the past few months, and found that the Keshi government decided to relax the floor area ratio of Beijing City at the Metropolitan Audit Committee on September 9, 2021. At that time, the committee members included Song Zhenmai, the daughter of the architect’s People’s Party Chairman James Soong, and Huang Taisheng, a retired associate professor of Jiaotong University (later not re-appointed), have repeatedly objected, pointing out that the Jinghua City case does not apply to the land management regulations, urban renewal regulations or endangerment regulations. There are also cultural assets on the side, and the existing volume bonus regulations cannot be applied.
Song Zhenmai (pictured), the architect daughter of People First Party Chairman Soong Chu-yu, was a member of the Taipei City Government’s Metropolitan Review Committee and opposed the relaxation of the floor area ratio of Jinghua City. The prosecutors called her to testify about the original review process.
People familiar with the matter told this publication that the prosecutors have reviewed the meeting materials and relevant signed documents of the Beijing Municipal Committee and the Municipal Development Bureau. According to the city government’s official documents at the time, the wording was “I submit it to you”, which means “I submit it to you.” ” means that the relevant grassroots personnel can only handle it according to the procedures. In order to avoid getting into trouble, it was finally sent to the Metropolitan Committee for discussion.
In addition, what the civil servant said when he was interviewed is consistent with the information recently revealed by Taipei City Councilor Jian Shupei. Jian Shupei recently asked the Beijing Municipal Government for information. The Beijing Municipal Government responded that during the tenure of Mayor Ke Wenzhe (from 2014), the Beijing City case was the only urban planning change case in which the city government assisted in convening a consultation meeting with experts and scholars. In addition, the Jinghua City case is also the only urban planning project submitted by private organizations during Ko’s second term (starting in 2018) and personally signed by Ko Wenzhe for public exhibition. Based on this accusation, the two “unique” statements made by the Ke Municipal Government on the Jinghua City case undoubtedly prove that Ke is alone and seeking to benefit Jinghua City. As for the truth? It remains to be clarified by the judiciary as soon as possible.
1724125477
#Wenzhes #involvement #corruption #intensifies #4Not #Soongs #daughter #appointed #capital #committee #stand #civil #servants #confession #Jinghua #City #case #bites #superiors #Mirror #Weekly #Mirror #Media
