The recent failed ballot measure in Jackson County, which would have provided funding for a new stadium for the Kansas City Royals and renovations for Arrowhead Stadium, has significant implications for the future of both teams. The measure, known as Question 1, was defeated with 58% of voters opposing it.
The proposed measure would have extended a 3/8-cent sales tax for 40 years, generating funds to cover the estimated costs of a $1.3 billion stadium for the Royals and an $800 million renovation of Arrowhead Stadium. However, with the measure’s failure, both teams are left to reassess their plans and determine their future in Kansas City.
Kansas City mayor Quinton Lucas expressed his willingness to work with the teams to develop a new plan that would ensure their continued presence in the city. This collaborative approach indicates a commitment to finding a solution that satisfies all parties involved.
The Royals, who recently unveiled plans for a new stadium in downtown Kansas City’s East Crossroads neighborhood, will now need to reconsider their options. The team had initially planned to close Oak Street as part of their development plans, but this decision was met with resistance from voters. With the measure’s failure, the team may need to make additional adjustments to their plans.
Both the Royals and Chiefs invested significant resources in promoting the passage of the tax measure, spending over $3 million combined. The Committee to Keep the Chiefs and Royals in Jackson County played a central role in advocating for the measure. Despite their efforts, the measure did not garner enough support from voters.
It is worth noting that neither team has explicitly threatened to leave the city if they do not receive public funding. However, the possibility of a move across state lines from Missouri to Kansas remains a potential option for both teams. The fact that team owner John Sherman is a Kansas City native and has shown a commitment to the area suggests a desire to maintain a presence in the city.
One intriguing aspect of the voting process was the reports of voters being turned away for wearing Chiefs and Royals gear. The Committee to Keep the Chiefs and Royals in Jackson County emphasized that wearing team logos to the polls is within voters’ rights and should not result in their exclusion. The extent of this issue and its impact on the overall vote outcome remains unclear.
Overall, the failure of the ballot measure raises questions regarding the future of both the Kansas City Royals and the Kansas City Chiefs. The teams will need to regroup and develop new strategies to address their stadium needs and ensure their long-term viability in the city. Collaboration between the teams, city officials, and the community will be crucial in finding a path forward.
