Two weeks before the presidential elections in the United States, the attacks between candidates are getting more and more intense, to the point that the Democratic candidate and vice president, Kamala Harris warned yesterday that his Republican opponent, Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals.
For its part, Trump criticized former President Barak Obama for “sabotaging” the candidacy of President Joe Biden, whose renunciation of the possibility of re-election paved the way for Kamala Harris to be on the ballot this year, and warned that “she is worse than him (Biden)”.
The “Fox News” portal reported yesterday that Trump llamó al “The Brian Kilmeade Show” on Fox News Radio to discuss what many critics see as the Democrat-instigated impeachment of Biden.
Kilmeade also asked Trump for his reaction to Obama’s recent remarks at a Kamala campaign rally.
Obama took credit for the strong economy under Trump, saying “it was my economy.”
Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
In turn, Kamala said yesterday, according to AP, that comments praising Adolf Hitler that supposedly Trump made whoever was his chief of staff They offer a glimpse into who the former president “really” is and the kind of commander in chief he would be.
In interviews with “The New York Times” and “The Atlantic” published on Tuesday, John Kelly warned that Trump meets the definition of fascist and that, when he was in office, he suggested that the Nazi ruler “did some good things.”
Yesterday, Kamala reiterated her Increasingly dire warnings about Trump’s mental fitness and his intentions for the presidency of the United States.
“This is a glimpse of who Donald Trump really is, from the point of view of the people who know him best, from the people who have worked closely with him in the Oval Office and in the Crisis Room,” commented the Democrat to reporters outside the vice president’s residence in Washington.
The remarks by Kelly, a retired Marine general who worked with Trump in the White House from 2017 to 2019, added to previous warnings made by former high-ranking Trump officials.
“(Trump) commented on more than one occasion that: ‘You know, Hitler did some good things too’“, reports Kelly in “The New York Times”.
Kelly added that he usually silenced the conversation by saying “that nothing (Hitler) did, you could argue, was good,” but that Trump would occasionally bring it up again.
In his interview with “The Atlantic,” Kelly recalled that when Trump raised the idea of needing “German generals,” Kelly asked him if he was referring to “Bismarck’s generals,” alluding to Otto von Bismarck, the chancellor who oversaw unification. from Germany. “Surely you’re not referring to Hitler’s generals,” Kelly said he asked Trump. To which the former president responded: “Yes, yes, Hitler’s generals.”
Kamala said yesterday that Trump admired Hitler’s generals because “he doesn’t want an army that is loyal to the Constitution of the United States, he wants an army that is loyal to him.”
Trump’s campaign team denied what Kelly said.
Campaign spokesman Steven Cheung said Kelly “was made a fool of by these debunked stories he fabricated,” and accused Kamala of sharing “outright lies and falsehoods.”
Record votes Great turnout
More than two million people have voted in Georgia during the early voting period, they said.
More than two million people have voted in Georgia in the early voting period, which represents almost 30 percent of the total number of voters in this state, considered decisive in the tight race for the Presidency of the United States, according to figures officials released yesterday Wednesday.
Republican Brad Raffensberger declared that Georgia voters participation records continue to be broken in early voting, which shows that in this state “it is easy to vote and difficult to cheat.” Early voting began on October 15.
Related
#Kamala #Harris #warns #Donald #Trump #admires #Hitlers #generals
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Sarah Mitchell on Recent Campaign Turbulence**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Mitchell. Recent statements by Kamala Harris regarding Donald Trump’s comments about Hitler’s generals have undoubtedly escalated tensions in this election cycle. What are your thoughts on Harris’s claims?
**Dr. Mitchell:** Thank you for having me. Kamala Harris’s remarks highlight a significant concern among many voters regarding Trump’s ideologies and behavior. By suggesting that Trump’s admiration for Hitler’s generals could inform his potential presidency, Harris is tapping into fears about authoritarianism and the historical implications of such ideologies. This framing could resonate with voters who prioritize historical awareness and ethical leadership.
**Editor:** In response, Trump has criticized Biden and derided Harris as “worse than him.” What impact do you think this kind of rhetoric has on the electorate?
**Dr. Mitchell:** Trump’s strategy of attacking Biden and Harris directly is classic for him, appealing to his base’s loyalty and fears. However, while this might energize his supporters, it risks alienating moderate voters who may find such divisive language off-putting. The effectiveness of this rhetoric will depend on how voters perceive the candidates in their overall character and values.
**Editor:** Former President Obama has also entered the fray by claiming credit for the strong economy under Trump. How does this play into the current narrative of the campaign?
**Dr. Mitchell:** Obama’s intervention adds another layer to the conversation. By framing the economic successes of the Trump administration as a continuation of his own policies, he positions Democrats as capable economic stewards. This can potentially undermine Republican claims of being the party of economic growth. It shifts the narrative back to Obama’s legacy, which both Biden and Harris can leverage as a counter to Trump’s criticisms.
**Editor:** With the election just two weeks away, how should candidates navigate these debates and personal attacks to effectively communicate their messages to voters?
**Dr. Mitchell:** Candidates need to find a balance between responding to attacks and providing clear, constructive plans for the future. Voters often crave substance over drama, so articulating policies that address current issues—such as the economy, healthcare, and social justice—while steering clear of personal attacks can be effective. It’s also imperative for candidates to maintain their composure and focus on unity rather than division, particularly in such polarized times.
**Editor:** what do you predict will be the main focus of debates leading up to the election?
**Dr. Mitchell:** I expect to see a heavy focus on character and leadership qualities, particularly as both parties are unveiling previously unreported behaviors and comments from their opponents. Additionally, we can anticipate discussions around the economy, public safety, and healthcare will dominate as candidates attempt to convince voters of their ability to govern effectively in challenging times. Ultimately, the candidates who can resonate emotionally with voters while providing clear, realistic policies will have the best chance of success.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Mitchell, for your insights. It’s certainly an intense time leading up to the elections.
**Dr. Mitchell:** Thank you! Definitely a crucial period for American democracy.
