Løkke is associated with the Civita think tank and followed last night’s TV debate between the two presidential candidates in the USA. He has no doubts about which of them came out the best.
– Harris used this opportunity to reach the voters in the middle and present who she is, and then she managed to create a good contrast to Donald Trump, to shake him so that he became irritated and visibly angry, he tells NTB.
– It was not surprising that Trump struggled to be disciplined, but this was a clear strategy for Harris, he says.
Ducked away
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
However, Harris did not answer all the questions she was asked, he notes.
– On some questions she ducked away, for example when she was asked if people are better off now than four years ago. She didn’t answer that, which she got away with.
– She also did not answer very well the question about the withdrawal from Afghanistan, the worst foreign policy event for the Biden administration, says Løkke.
Limited degree
Although Harris made a good impression during the TV debate, such debates move the voters to a small extent, Løkke believes.
– But there was a certain proportion of voters in advance who felt that they did not know Kamala Harris well enough, and for them this was a good opportunity to introduce themselves and what she stands for.
– It is now so incredibly smooth that even small movements can potentially have an important effect, he says.
What will move the voters the most, the TV debate or pop star Taylor Swift’s support for Harris after the debate, Løkke is unsure.
– It remains to be seen what will have the most effect on the opinion polls, he says.
Don’t lose voters
Although Donald Trump came off badly during the debate, Løkke does not think he lost voters.
– No, I don’t think so. But that is not the important question either. The question is whether Harris wins doubters, and I think she made a good effort there, he says.
#Løkke #good #night #Kamala #Harris
2024-09-12 15:23:25
What strategies did Kamala Harris use in the debate against Donald Trump to gain an advantage?
Kamala Harris Shines in Presidential Debate Against Donald Trump, Say Experts
In the recent presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, many experts agree that Harris emerged as the clear winner. Løkke, an analyst associated with the Civita think tank, was impressed by Harris’s performance, stating that she effectively presented herself to voters in the middle and created a strong contrast to Trump [[1]].
Harris’s Strategy Paid Off
Harris’s strategy of pushing Trump’s buttons and making him visibly angry seemed to pay off, according to Løkke. He noted that Trump struggled to remain disciplined, allowing Harris to take control of the debate [[1]]. This was echoed by Anthony Zurcher, who wrote that Trump couldn’t resist Harris’s personal digs, which threw him off message [[3]].
A Missed Opportunity
However, Løkke also pointed out that Harris did not answer all the questions she was asked, dodging certain topics such as whether people are better off now than four years ago and the withdrawal from Afghanistan [[1]]. These missed opportunities could have given Trump an opening to counterattack.
Limited Impact
Despite Harris’s strong performance, Løkke believes that debates have a limited impact on voter opinion, citing that they only move the needle to a small extent [[1]]. Nevertheless, he acknowledged that for voters who didn’t know Harris well, the debate provided a valuable opportunity to get to know her and what she stands for.
Reactions from Around the World
French news outlet France 24 described the debate as ”électrique” (electric), noting that Trump was forced to defend himself against Harris’s well-prepared attacks [[2]]. The BBC also reported on the debate, highlighting Harris’s ability to rattle Trump with her sharp responses [[3]].
Conclusion
Kamala Harris’s performance in the presidential debate against Donald Trump was widely praised by experts and observers. While she did dodge some questions, her strategy of presenting herself to middle voters and creating a strong contrast to Trump paid off. As the presidential race heats up, it remains to be seen how much impact this debate will have on voter opinion.
Watch the Debate
If you missed the debate, you can still catch it on YouTube [[1]].
References
What specific techniques did Kamala Harris use to provoke reactions from Donald Trump during the debate?
What Strategies Did Kamala Harris Use in the Debate Against Donald Trump to Gain an Advantage?
In the recent presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, many experts agree that Harris emerged as the clear winner. Løkke, an analyst associated with the Civita think tank, was impressed by Harris’s performance, stating that she effectively presented herself to voters in the middle and created a strong contrast to Trump [[1]].
Harris’s Strategy Paid Off
Harris’s strategy of pushing Trump’s buttons and making him visibly angry seemed to pay off, according to Løkke. He noted that Trump struggled to remain disciplined, allowing Harris to take control of the debate [[1]]. This was echoed by Anthony Zurcher, who wrote that Trump couldn’t resist Harris’s personal digs, which threw him off message [[3]].
A Missed Opportunity
However, Løkke also pointed out that Harris did not answer all the questions she was asked, dodging certain topics such as whether people are better off now than four years ago and the withdrawal from Afghanistan [[1]]. These missed opportunities could have given Trump an opening to counterattack.
Limited Impact
Despite Harris’s strong performance, Løkke believes that debates have a limited impact on voter opinion, citing that they only move the needle to a small extent [[1]]. Nevertheless, he acknowledged that for voters who didn’t know Harris well, the debate provided a valuable opportunity to get to know her and what she
