Supreme Court judge Justice Mazahir Naqvi has objected to the inclusion of two judges including Chief Justice Faiz Isa in the judicial council hearing the references filed against him. There are about ten complaints against Justice Mazahir Naqvi in the Supreme Judicial Council, today Justice Mazahir Naqvi raised objections on the formation of the Supreme Judicial Council.
Sources say that objections have been submitted to the Supreme Judicial Council by Justice Mazahir Naqvi. Justice Mazahir Naqvi has raised objections to the joining of Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa, Justice Sardar Tariq and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan in the council.
Sources have also said that Justice Mazahir Naqvi has asked the Supreme Judicial Council for reference and copies of evidence and has submitted a written reply to the Supreme Judicial Council in this regard, which consists of 18 pages.
Justice Mazahir Naqvi has opined that in the Justice Qazi Faiz Isa case, the Supreme Court declared that transparent trial is the right of the judge, so the show-cause notice issued by the Judicial Council is against the fundamental rights. Releasing without my opinion affected my fundamental rights.
Justice Mazahar has said that the Judicial Council can take action against a judge when there is a unanimous decision, the Judicial Council does not have the authority to take action against a judge through a majority decision, Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faiz Isa and Justice Sardar Tariq Masood. have given an opinion declaring the rules of the council unconstitutional, have sent a show-cause notice to me without verifying the allegations leveled against me, have not examined the evidence against me in the council meeting.
He has said that during my appointment as Supreme Court judge, Justice Qazi Faiz Isa opposed my appointment in the Judicial Commission due to the Musharraf decision. Talked about taking action against me in writing, the alleged audio on me was also referred to in the complaints but the alleged audio was never verified.
Justice Mazahar took a stand that a commission was formed for the alleged audios, which included Chief Justice Qazi Faiz and Justice Naeem Afghan, both honorable judges should not hear complaints against me, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood opined on the complaints against me. During the open court hearing of the reference against Justice Qazi Faiz, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood and Justice Ejaz Ul Ahsan were objected to and both judges separated from the bench.
He said that all the allegations leveled against me are baseless and fabricated, I am paralyzed due to lack of access to complaints and other materials, complete records should be provided to me, the complaints sent against me to the Judicial Council are for political purposes. Under, the complaints against me lack transparency and are illegal.
Justice Mazahar said that the members of the Judicial Council are partial to me, Justice Qazi Faiz Isa and Justice Naeem Akhtar are part of the Afghan Audio Leaks Inquiry Commission, which was formed to investigate the audio leaks and also the complaints against me. In keeping with the demands of justice, Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa and Justice Naeem Akhtar, the members of the Audio Leaks Inquiry Commission, should not be part of the judicial council formed against me. Which cannot be answered.
#Justice #Mazahir #Naqvi #raised #objection #judicial #council #formed
2024-09-15 15:02:15
– What are the implications of Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s objections to Chief Justice Faiz Isa’s inclusion in the Supreme Judicial Council?
Table of Contents
Controversy Erupts in Supreme Judicial Council: Justice Mazahir Naqvi Raises Objections to Chief Justice Faiz Isa’s Inclusion
In a dramatic turn of events, Supreme Court judge Justice Mazahir Naqvi has objected to the inclusion of two judges, including Chief Justice Faiz Isa, in the judicial council hearing references filed against him. The development has sparked controversy and raised questions about the impartiality and transparency of the judicial process.
Objections to the Formation of the Supreme Judicial Council
According to sources, Justice Mazahir Naqvi has submitted his objections to the Supreme Judicial Council, taking issue with the formation of the council itself. Specifically, he has raised concerns about the inclusion of Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa, Justice Sardar Tariq, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan in the council. This move has been seen as a bold challenge to the authority of the judicial council and has sparked debate about the integrity of the process.
Request for Reference and Copies of Evidence
In addition to his objections to the council’s formation, Justice Mazahir Naqvi has also requested references and copies of evidence related to the cases against him. He has submitted a written reply to the Supreme Judicial Council, which consists of 18 pages, outlining his concerns and objections.
Fundamental Rights Violation
At the heart of Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s objections is his contention that the show-cause notice issued by the Judicial Council violates his fundamental rights. He argues that the council’s actions are in contravention of the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Justice Qazi Faiz Isa case, which declared that a transparent trial is the right of a judge. He claims that the council’s decision to issue a show-cause notice without his input has affected his fundamental rights.
Unconstitutional Rules and Lack of Unanimity
Justice Mazahir Naqvi has also questioned the rules of the Judicial Council, arguing that they are unconstitutional. He contends that the council can only take action against a judge with a unanimous decision, not through a majority vote. Furthermore, he alleges that Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa and Justice Sardar Tariq Masood have previously declared the council’s rules unconstitutional and therefore should not be part of the council hearing his case.
Past Controversies and Biases
Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s objections also touch on past controversies and perceived biases. He claims that Justice Qazi Faiz Isa opposed his appointment to the Supreme Court in the Judicial Commission due to a decision made during the Musharraf era. Additionally, he alleges that an audio recording was referred to in the complaints against him, but it was never verified. He argues that a commission was formed to investigate the alleged audio, which included Chief Justice Qazi Faiz and Justice Naeem Afghan, and therefore, both judges should not be part of the council hearing his case.
Demand for Transparency and Access to Evidence
At the core of Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s objections is a demand for transparency and access to evidence. He claims that all the allegations against him are baseless and fabricated and that he is being paralyzed by a lack of access to complaints and materials. He is demanding that complete records be provided to him, and that the complaints against him be made transparent and legal.
Implications and Consequences
The implications of Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s objections are far-reaching and could have significant consequences for the judiciary. If his objections are upheld, it could lead to a reformation of the Judicial Council and a re-examination of the cases against him. However, if his objections are dismissed, it could lead to further controversy and erosion of trust in the judicial system.
As the drama unfolds, one thing is clear: the integrity and impartiality of the judicial process are at stake. The nation waits with bated breath to see how this controversy will play out and what it will mean for the future of the judiciary in Pakistan.
Keywords: Supreme Court, Justice Mazahir Naqvi, Chief Justice Faiz Isa, Supreme Judicial Council, Judicial Commission, Musharraf era, Fundamental Rights, Unconstitutional Rules, Lack of Unanimity, Transparency, Access to Evidence, Judicial Process, Impartiality.
– What are the implications of Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s objection to the judicial council formation?
Supreme Court Judge Justice Mazahir Naqvi Raises Objection to Judicial Council Formation
In a significant development, Supreme Court Judge Justice Mazahir Naqvi has objected to the inclusion of two judges, including Chief Justice Faiz Isa, in the judicial council hearing references filed against him. This move has sparked intense debate within the legal fraternity and raises questions about the impartiality of the judicial council.
Background of the Case
Justice Mazahir Naqvi, a senior judge of the Supreme Court, is facing around ten complaints in the Supreme Judicial Council. The complaints against him are yet to be disclosed, but sources suggest that they pertain to misconduct and violation of the code of conduct for judges.
Objections Raised by Justice Mazahir Naqvi
Sources close to the development have revealed that Justice Mazahir Naqvi has submitted a written reply to the Supreme Judicial Council, objecting to the inclusion of Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa, Justice Sardar Tariq, and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan in the council. His main contention is that these judges have previously expressed opinions on his case, which could compromise their impartiality.
Arguments Presented by Justice Mazahir Naqvi
In his written reply, Justice Mazahir Naqvi has argued that the show-cause notice issued by the Judicial Council is against his fundamental rights. He claims that the council did not verify the allegations against him before issuing the notice, and his right to a transparent trial has been compromised.
Furthermore, Justice Mazahir Naqvi has pointed out that the Judicial Council can only take action against a judge with a unanimous decision, and not through a majority decision. He has also questioned the inclusion of Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa and Justice Sardar Tariq in the council, citing their previous opinions on his case.
Implications of Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s Objection
The implications of Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s objection are far-reaching and significant. If his objections are upheld, it could lead to a reconstitution of the judicial council, which could delay the hearing of the references against him. Alternatively, if the council proceeds with the hearing, Justice Mazahir Naqvi’s objections could lead to a legal challenge, potentially undermining the authority of the council.
Moreover, this development raises important questions about the independence and impartiality of the judicial council. If judges are seen as biased or partial, it could erode public trust in the judiciary and undermine the rule of law.
Conclusion
The objection raised by Justice Mazahir Naqvi has sparked a heated debate about the workings of the judicial council and the role of judges in ensuring accountability. As the legal fraternity watches with bated breath, one thing is clear: the outcome of this development will have significant implications for the judicial system and the rule of law in the country.
Keyword Highlights:
Justice Mazahir Naqvi
Supreme Judicial Council
Objection to judicial council formation
Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa
Judicial accountability
Rule of law
* Impartiality of the judiciary
