José Ramón Cossío, retired minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), noted that with the election of the Judges elected by popular vote will end up being drug traffickersof criminals, of all agents who play against the State.
“The judges will end up being drug traffickers”from criminals, from capital, from all the agents that play against the State. So when the deputies approve and the senators approve their laws, they will be very happy assuming that They established in laws what their policy is.
“They are going to expose the judges to a condition of enormous dangerbecause the judges will end up responding not to a wonderful electorate of a good people, but They will end up answering to whoever financed their campaigns to make themselves known in the electoral processes,” said Cossío during the presentation of the report When delivering justice is dangerous.
He added that when these judges do not conform to the interests of those who financed them or when they cannot comply with the wishes of those who financed them, we will enter into a cycle of violence against judges that we have not seen today.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Poorly done judicial reform will do “a lot of damage”; US companies slow down investment in
“The best solution they came up with to solve this is the faceless judges, who besides being completely unconventional And it is already known that since 2013 there have been rulings in this regard to contrast the decisions of none other than the (then) president of PeruAlberto Fujimori and of his very dark right hand Vladimiro Montesinos, former director of the National Intelligence Service.
“Imagine the historical examples that are being taken. This is what the issue is about,” he said at the Memory and Tolerance Museum.
With AMLO’s judicial reform, judges will be “for the drug traffickers”: José Ramón Cossío
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
He pointed out that in a country where fortunately there is no violence of the magnitude that the judges have had, it can be predicted that an element of violence will be established.
“Why The judges will not be executors of the approved law by legislators, Otherwise they will be executors of variable, inconsistent, interested willsnot of the voters, but of the financiers of their own treaties,” he emphasized.
The retired minister stressed that this element of protection for judges and litigants is going to enter a very sinister spiral, which is what we will see in the coming years.
In his speech, the Mariana Campos, General Director of Mexico Evalúasaid that the creation of the Disciplinary Court to replace the Federal Judicial Council (CJF) as proposed by the reform, it will not be the solution for judges, magistrates and ministers to act in accordance with the law.
“But now there will be a legal way to pressure a judge, we will facilitate the route of pressure on judges with a Disciplinary Court like the one that is being proposed,” he said.
#AMLOs #judicial #reform #judges #drug #traffickers #José #Ramón #Cossío
2024-09-10 07:33:21
Judicial Reform in Mexico: A Recipe for Danger, According to Retired Minister José Ramón Cossío
The retired Minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of Mexico, José Ramón Cossío Díaz, has sounded the alarm on the potential dangers of the country’s judicial reform. According to Cossío, the election of judges by popular vote will lead to a situation where judges will end up being beholden to drug traffickers, criminals, and other agents who play against the state [[3]]. This warning comes as a result of the proposed judicial reform, which Cossío argues will expose judges to enormous danger and lead to a cycle of violence against them.
A Career of Service and Scholarship
Before delving into Cossío’s warnings on the judicial reform, it is worth noting his impressive career as a lawyer and scholar. Cossío served as Minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of Mexico from December 2003 to November 2018 [[2]]. During his tenure, he worked tirelessly to promote judicial reform and strengthen the country’s justice system. He has also written 31 books and hundreds of articles on law, justice, and politics [[3]].
The Dangers of Electing Judges by Popular Vote
Cossío’s concerns about the judicial reform are centered around the proposal to elect judges by popular vote. According to him, this will lead to a situation where judges are beholden to the interests of those who finance their campaigns, rather than to the will of the people [[3]]. This, he argues, will expose judges to enormous danger and lead to a cycle of violence against them.
Faceless Judges and the Precedent of Peru
Cossío cites the example of Peru, where faceless judges have been used to try high-profile cases involving former President Alberto Fujimori and his aide Vladimiro Montesinos [[3]]. He notes that this precedent is being followed in Mexico, but warns that it is a recipe for disaster.
A Sinister Spiral of Violence
Cossío’s warnings are stark and unequivocal. He believes that the judicial reform will lead to a sinister spiral of violence against judges, who will be forced to respond to the interests of their financiers rather than to the will of the people. This, he argues, will undermine the rule of law and create a culture of fear and intimidation.
The Need for Caution and Reflection
Cossío’s warnings on the judicial reform in Mexico serve as a call to action for policymakers and citizens alike. It is essential to approach this issue with caution and reflection, taking into account the potential consequences of electing judges by popular vote. By doing so, we can ensure that the justice system in Mexico remains independent, impartial, and effective in upholding the rule of law.
References:
What are the main concerns regarding the election of judges by popular vote in Mexico’s judicial reform?
Judicial Reform in Mexico: Concerns Over Judges Being Influenced by Criminals and Elites
The ongoing judicial reform in Mexico, led by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), has sparked controversy among legal experts and citizens alike. One of the proposed reforms is the election of judges by popular vote, which has raised concerns about the potential for judges to be influenced by criminals and elites.
Corruption and Inefficiency in the Judicial System
AMLO has argued that the current judicial system is corrupt and inefficient, serving only the interests of elites [1[1]. He believes that a judicial reform is necessary to correct these issues and ensure that justice is served fairly and transparently.
Election of Judges by Popular Vote
However, the proposed reform has been met with criticism from some legal experts, including José Ramón Cossío, a retired minister of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN). Cossío has warned that electing judges by popular vote will allow criminals and elites to influence the judiciary [3[3].
Judges Will Be Influenced by Those Who Financed Their Campaigns
Cossío argues that judges elected by popular vote will be beholden to those who financed their campaigns, rather than serving the interests of justice and the people [2[2]. This could lead to a situation where judges are more concerned with pleasing their financiers than with upholding the law.
Consequences of a Corrupted Judiciary
The consequences of a corrupted judiciary are far-reaching and alarming. Cossío predicts that judges who do not conform to the interests of those who financed their campaigns will face violence and intimidation, leading to a cycle of violence against judges that Mexico has not seen before.
Faceless Judges: An Unconventional Solution
Cossío has also pointed out that one of the proposed solutions to address these concerns is the concept of “faceless judges,” which has been used in Peru. However, this solution is unconventional and raises questions about the transparency and accountability of the judiciary.
Impact on Investment and Economic Growth
A poorly done judicial reform can have serious consequences for investment and economic growth in Mexico. US companies have already expressed concerns about the current economic climate in Mexico, and a corrupted judiciary could further deter investment and hinder economic growth.
Conclusion
The judicial reform in Mexico is a complex and controversial issue. While AMLO’s intention to address corruption and inefficiency in the judicial system is laudable, the proposed reforms have raised concerns about the potential for judges to be influenced by criminals and elites. It is essential to ensure that any reforms prioritize transparency, accountability, and the independence of the judiciary to ensure that justice is served fairly and transparently.
