Judge in Semarang Breaks Ranks, Keeps Justice Alive Amidst City-Wide Shutdown

Judge in Semarang Breaks Ranks, Keeps Justice Alive Amidst City-Wide Shutdown
The judges who are members of the Indonesian Judges Solidarity (SHI) went to the Supreme Court for an audience. (MI/Usman Iskandar)

Spokesperson for the District Court (PN) of Semarang City, Central Java, Haruno Patriadi, confirmed that his party would continue to carry out various trial services, in the midst of a strike by judges throughout Indonesia as part of a form of protest over welfare which has not been a priority for the government.

“Office activities are still as usual. “We are still serving trials for justice seekers,” said Haruno to Media Indonesia via written message, Monday (7/10).

Haruno explained that the judges at the Semarang City District Court made sure not to take part in the action, but still provided moral support to the judges who took part in carrying out the strike.

Also read: Corruption Court Still Holding Sessions Amid Judges’ Strike

“None of our parties are taking part in the leave action, but we only support it morally,” explained Haruno.

On Monday (7/10) afternoon, various trial services at the Semarang District Court continued. “Earlier I had time to go around, the corruption trial, criminal trial and civil trial were still ongoing,” said Haruno.

Previously, thousands of judges held a work strike by going on leave with judges throughout Indonesia as a form of protest against the government which had not prioritized the welfare of judges. The strike action was held in the form of mass leave which will take place from 7-11 October 2024.

The judges asked for adjustments to salaries and allowances regulated in Government Regulation (PP) Number 94 of 2012 which have not changed for 12 years. These justice determiners also no longer receive remuneration as performance allowances which were abolished in 2012. (J-2)

#Participating #Strike #Semarang #City #District #Court #Judge #Continues #Serve #Justice #Seekers
“Justice in Limbo: Indonesian Judges’ Mass Strike Raises Concerns”

As ​I read through the news article, ​a sense of astonishment and concern washed over me. Indonesian judges, the very pillars of justice and ‍law, have decided to ‍take a collective stand against ‌the government’s alleged neglect ⁤of‍ their welfare and security. The news has left me pondering the implications of such a move and the potential impact⁢ on the country’s justice system.

According to reports, over 1,300 judges across Indonesia have planned⁤ to‍ strike for better pay, ⁣benefits, and working conditions [[3]]. The strike, which began on October 7,⁣ 2024, is expected to last for five days, causing widespread disruption to the country’s courts [[2]].⁣ The judges, organized under the Solidaritas Hakim Indonesia (Solidarity⁤ of Indonesian Judges), claim that their wages and allowances have been frozen for 12 years, leaving them feeling undervalued and overworked [[1]].

The strike‍ has sparked a heated debate about the state of Indonesia’s justice system and the government’s handling of judicial⁣ affairs. Critics argue that the strike is a manifestation of the country’s deeper issues, including corruption, nepotism, ⁢and the ‌erosion of judicial‌ independence.

The impact of the strike on the justice system is already being ​felt. ⁤With many courts closed or ⁤operating at reduced capacity, litigants and ‍justice seekers are facing delays and uncertainty [[2]]. The​ strike has also raised concerns about the potential for backlog and congestion in the courts, which could ⁢take months⁢ or even years to clear.

However, supporters of the strike ⁢argue that the judges’ grievances are legitimate and that the government has neglected their welfare for far too long. They point out‌ that the judges are not just fighting ⁣for better pay and benefits but also for improved working conditions and greater security.

As a neutral observer, I⁢ must say that the strike raises more questions than answers. What led⁢ to the freeze on judges’ wages and ​allowances? How will the​ government respond to the strike ​and the judges’ demands? What implications will this have on the country’s justice system in the long ‌run?

The strike is a stark reminder that the justice system is not immune to ​the pressures and ⁢challenges faced by other professions.​ It highlights the need for greater accountability, transparency, and respect​ for the judicial branch.

As‍ the ⁢strike continues, I will ​be closely monitoring developments and analyzing the impact on Indonesia’s‌ justice system. One thing is certain: the fate of justice in Indonesia hangs in the balance,‍ and the outcome of this strike will have far-reaching implications for the country’s future.

References:

[[1]]

[[2]]

[[3]]

Leave a Replay