APEC leaders split on the wars in Ukraine and Gaza on Friday, with the Pacific region unable to agree on a response to the conflicts.
The 21 members of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), which includes Russia, China and the United States, did not mention a single conflict in their final joint communique.
Instead, the chairman’s accompanying statement noted that the bloc merely “exchanged views on the ongoing crisis in Gaza.”
Last month, Israel launched an air and ground campaign in the Gaza Strip, killing 12,000, according to the Hamas-run Health Ministry. people, mostly civilians.
This was in response to a cross-border attack by Hamas gunmen on October 7, which killed around 1,200 people. people, and 240 people were taken hostage.
APEC focuses on trade and brings together countries as diverse as Muslim-majority Indonesia and the United States, a key ally of Israel.
“Some leaders also shared the unified message of the November 11, 2023, joint Arab-Islamic summit in Riyadh that accused Israel of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
“Some leaders objected to the inclusion of such rhetoric in the accompanying 2023 APEC Leaders’ Golden Gate Declaration on the basis that, in their view, APEC is not a forum to discuss geopolitical issues,” the chairman said in a statement.
The statement said there was no agreement on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
“The majority of members strongly condemn the aggression against Ukraine and emphasize the need to achieve a just and lasting peace based on the principles of the United Nations Charter, including the territorial integrity, sovereignty and political independence of Ukraine,” the statement said. “We note with great concern the negative impact of the war in Ukraine and emphasize that it is causing enormous human suffering and increasing the existing vulnerability of the world economy.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin was not among the heads of state attending the meeting. The International Criminal Court has issued him an arrest warrant for ordering his troops to invade Ukraine.
Instead, the country was represented by Deputy Prime Minister Alexey Overchuk.
window.fbAsyncInit = function() {
FB.init({
appId: ‘117218911630016’,
version: ‘v2.10’,
status: true,
cookie: false,
xfbml: true
});
};
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) {
return;
}
js = d.createElement(s);
js.id = id;
js.src = “https://connect.facebook.net/lt_LT/sdk.js”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
#Joe #Biden #supporting #Ukraine #allowing #troops #war
2024-09-09 15:19:39
Table of Contents
- 1 Here are the PAA (People Also Ask) related questions for the title **”APEC Leaders Divided on Response to Ukraine and Gaza Conflicts”:**
- 2 What factors contributed to the lack of consensus among APEC member nations regarding the responses to the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza during the recent meeting?
APEC Leaders Divided on Response to Ukraine and Gaza Conflicts
The recent Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting concluded with a notable absence of consensus among its 21 member nations on how to address the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. The joint communique failed to mention a single conflict, despite the critical nature of these crises.
The Gaza Conflict
The Gaza Strip has been embroiled in violence since last month, with Israel launching an air and ground campaign in response to a cross-border attack by Hamas gunmen. The conflict has resulted in the loss of 12,000 lives, primarily civilians, according to the Hamas-run Health Ministry. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has sparked widespread concern and condemnation from various nations.
APEC’s Limited Response
Instead of issuing a joint statement on the Gaza conflict, the APEC chairman’s accompanying statement merely noted that the bloc “exchanged views on the ongoing crisis in Gaza.” This limited response has been met with criticism, as some leaders felt that APEC was not the appropriate forum to discuss geopolitical issues.
Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
The meeting also failed to reach a consensus on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. While the majority of APEC members strongly condemned the aggression against Ukraine, emphasizing the need for a just and lasting peace based on the principles of the United Nations Charter, Russia was not represented by its President Vladimir Putin, who has been issued an arrest warrant by the International Criminal Court for ordering the invasion.
APEC’s Focus on Trade
APEC’s primary focus is on trade, bringing together countries with diverse backgrounds, such as Muslim-majority Indonesia and the United States, a key ally of Israel. While the organization’s aim is to promote economic cooperation and growth, its inability to address pressing geopolitical issues has sparked concern and criticism.
Other APEC-Related Topics
It is worth noting that APEC is not only an organization focused on trade and economics. In other contexts, APEC can refer to other entities, such as APEC whole house systems, which provide water treatment solutions for households [[1]]. Additionally, APEC can also stand for other organizations, such as APEC, a French consultancy firm specializing in employment, recruitment, and career development [[2]]. Furthermore, APEC can also be used in the context of web development, as seen in the demo of a split slider on the APEC website [[3]].
the recent APEC meeting highlighted the organization’s limitations in addressing critical geopolitical issues. As the world continues to grapple with the complexities of global conflicts, it is essential for international organizations like APEC to take a more proactive and united stance in promoting peace, stability, and cooperation.
What factors contributed to the lack of consensus among APEC member nations regarding the responses to the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza during the recent meeting?
APEC Leaders Divided on Response to Ukraine and Gaza Conflicts
The recent Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting concluded with a notable absence of consensus among its 21 member nations on how to address the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. The joint communique failed to mention a single conflict, despite the critical nature of these crises.
The Gaza Conflict
The Gaza Strip has been embroiled in violence since last month, with Israel launching an air and ground campaign in response to a cross-border attack by Hamas gunmen. The conflict has resulted in the loss of 12,000 lives, primarily civilians, according to the Hamas-run Health Ministry. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza has sparked widespread concern and condemnation from various nations.
APEC’s Limited Response
Instead of issuing a joint statement on the Gaza conflict, the APEC chairman’s accompanying statement merely noted that the bloc “exchanged views on the ongoing crisis in Gaza.” This limited response has been met with criticism, as some leaders felt that APEC was not the appropriate forum to discuss geopolitical issues. As stated in the chairman’s statement, “Some leaders also shared the unified message of the November 11, 2023, joint Arab-Islamic summit in Riyadh that accused Israel of war crimes and crimes against humanity.” [[2]]
Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
The meeting also failed to reach a consensus on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. While the majority of APEC members strongly condemned the aggression against Ukraine, emphasizing the need for a just and lasting peace based on the principles of the United Nations Charter