Jennifer Garner changes mind about Jennifer Lopez amid Ben Affleck divorce

Jennifer Garner changes mind about Jennifer Lopez amid Ben Affleck divorce

Jennifer ⁢Garner Steps Back from Jennifer⁢ Lopez Amid Ben Affleck Divorce

Actress Jennifer Garner has reportedly chosen to distance ⁤herself‍ from Jennifer Lopez following Ben‍ Affleck’s divorce filing. Sources suggest ​Garner initially tried to remain neutral adn encouraged the couple to seek counseling.

However, insiders reveal that certain ⁤aspects of Lopez’s behavior troubled Garner, leading her to feel uncomfortable and manipulated. “She felt like⁣ she was‌ being manipulated,” a source shared.⁢ As⁤ a ​result, Garner decided to create‌ space for herself ⁣and avoid involvement in the former couple’s personal affairs.

“jen just thinks it’s better if she keeps her ⁣distance from J.Lo ‍during the divorce,” ⁣the source explained. “She wants ⁢to stay out of Ben and J.Lo’s personal business⁤ from⁢ now on.”

Although⁣ Garner‌ initially allowed her children to maintain a connection with Lopez, she ‌reportedly ‌changed her mind and opted for a more distant approach.

Despite their separation, Affleck continues to be a frequent guest at Garner’s home for family dinners. Sources describe Garner’s ongoing concern for ⁣Affleck’s well-being, noting her efforts to remind him about medical‍ appointments and even sending⁢ him vitamin supplements.

“She’s very concerned about his health, to ⁣the point⁢ where she reminds him when he needs to see the doctor and the ⁣dentist and even sends him vitamins to take because she’s convinced he doesn’t get enough healthy food when she’s not cooking for him,” the source revealed.

This code snippet highlights the process of dynamically loading JavaScript files onto​ a webpage. The snippet‍ utilizes setTimeout functions to control the⁢ timing of these script injections.

Several arrays hold URLs for different JavaScript‍ libraries: jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper.js, Firebase,‍ and custom scripts. Each setTimeout function iterates through one of these arrays, creating ‍script elements and appending them to the document’s body after a specified delay.

The⁢ delays, set at 500 and 1000 milliseconds respectively, likely serve to ensure that the webpage’s essential structure, likely handled ‍by earlier scripts, ‌has loaded⁤ before these ‍additional libraries are integrated. ⁤This approach helps prevent conflicts and errors that might arise from scripts⁢ attempting to access ‌elements or functionality that ⁤hasn’t been fully initialized.

The ⁢commented-out sections suggest the possibility of further script loading, potentially for lazy ‍loading images or other ⁢asynchronous operations.

The‍ provided code snippet appears to be JavaScript responsible for dynamically loading external scripts into a‌ webpage. It utilizes a combination of timers and conditional checks to determine when certain scripts, such as jQuery and Swiper.js, are available‌ before‌ injecting them into the document.

The code first checks for ⁢the presence of jQuery using a regular interval. Once jQuery is detected, it proceeds to load ‍specific JavaScript files from an array called ​”sliderjs,” executing this only if a certain element with the class “embedgallery” ⁤exists on the page.

Following a short delay, it then iterates through another array, “alljscustom,” loading additional ​scripts into the page.The purpose⁤ of these scripts isn’t entirely clear from the provided snippet.

This code demonstrates a ‍method for ⁣asynchronous script loading, ensuring that dependencies are ⁢met ‍before specific functionality is⁤ executed.

This​ JavaScript code snippet dynamically loads external scripts for various embeddable media like Flourish ‌visualizations, Apester interactive content, and Twitter tweets. It ​iterates through the HTML, checking for specific classes like “flourishClass,” “apester-media,” and “twitter-tweet.” ‍⁤ If these classes⁢ are found, the script generates a new `

Leave a Replay