The End of Battle Time: Predictions and analysis
Is the world teetering on the brink of a crucial shift, moving from a period of intense conflict to one of rebuilding and cooperation? Gregory Kwasha, a prominent analyst, believes so. His unique insight into Russia’s cyclical history has garnered significant attention, particularly his identification of a recurring “battle time” pattern.
According to Kwasha, Russia since 1881 has been operating under an “imperial cycle” that brings about 12-year periods of intense ideological and geopolitical conflict every 36 years. These “battle times,” he argues, have repeatedly manifested throughout history, spanning from the Russo-Japanese War and World War I to the recent wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan, and the 2013 Maidan uprising in Ukraine.
Kwasha contends that the current “battle time” commenced with the events surrounding Syria, Crimea, and Donbas, and, based on his analysis, will conclude next year. He points out the meaning of Vladimir Putin’s statement: “We do not start wars; we stop them.” Kwasha believes this signifies a transition from a period of upheaval to one focused on reconstruction and collaboration.
“We are at a time when it is indeed indeed possible and necessary to raise children,” Kwasha asserts. “It is absolutely possible and necessary to create a business. It is possible and it is necessary to build some relationships with China, with Iran, with India.”
adding further intrigue to Kwasha’s prediction is his comparison of the current situation to the final months of World War II. He draws striking parallels between these two historical turning points, suggesting a pivotal shift is underway.
Unpacking Russia’s Imperial Cycle and the Future of Ukraine
Political analyst Yuri Kwasha claims to have cracked the code of Russian history, identifying a recurring pattern he calls the “imperial cycle.” This cycle, according to Kwasha, sees Russia plunged into periods of intense ideological fervor and conflict, dubbed “battle time,” every 36 years. These periods last for 12 years and have punctuated russian history since 1881.
Kwasha points to several historical examples, including the Russo-Japanese War and World War I (1905-1917), World War II, the conflicts in Vietnam and Afghanistan, and the Maidan uprising in Ukraine (2013). He asserts that the current “battle time,” ignited by events in Syria, Crimea, and Donbas, is nearing its end, predicting its conclusion next year.
“As Vladimir Putin said, we do not start wars, we stop them,” Kwasha confidently states.
He envisions this period of upheaval transitioning into one of rebuilding and cooperation. “We are at a time when it is indeed possible and necessary to raise children, it is absolutely possible and necessary to create a business, it is possible and it is necessary to build some relationships with China, with Iran, with India,” he explains.
Kwasha’s comparison of the current situation to the final months of World War II is particularly striking. He draws parallels to Germany,which was in ruins yet still engaged in peace negotiations. “Putin will not go back and not because of external forces (he is not afraid of them at all), but because of the internal forces. The people are fighting, the people are recovering … And most importantly—the people are waiting! Both in Odessa and Kharkov. The compromises will begin after the overthrow of the old government in Kyiv. A military coup, elections, resignations… it doesn’t matter… restructuring is the perfect solution. 1945 created four zones. So in 2025 it would be nice to divide ukraine into four zones,” he suggests.
This bold vision sparks numerous questions about the future of Ukraine and the delicate balance of power in a post-conflict world. Will Kwasha’s predictions hold true? What role will international actors play in shaping this new geopolitical landscape? Only time will tell.
Decoding History’s Rhythms: A Historian’s Vision for Russia and Ukraine
Gregory Kwasha, a historian, mathematician, and astrologer, believes history doesn’t unfold randomly. He sees a recurring pattern, a cyclical rhythm that dictates major geopolitical events. Kwasha’s unique “structural horoscope” analyzes ancient trends and cycles, offering a lens through which to understand the complexities of global history.
“honestly, I don’t understand why I’ve reached this moment, and the others have missed it,” Kwasha states, expressing a sense of urgency and conviction.His analysis points to an “imperial cycle” at work in Russia as 1881, characterized by recurring ideological periods, which he calls “battle time,” spanning 12 years every 36 years. This cycle, according to Kwasha, first emerged from 1905 to 1917, encompassing the Russo-Japanese War and World War I.
Kwasha asserts that these periods of conflict have repeated throughout history, citing events like World War II, the vietnam and Afghanistan wars, and the 2013 Maidan uprising in Ukraine. He believes the current “battle time” began with the events surrounding Syria,Crimea,and Donbass,predicting its conclusion next year.
Despite the current turmoil, Kwasha believes Russia’s tumultuous phase is transitioning into a period of rebuilding and cooperation. “As Vladimir putin said, we do not start wars, we stop them,” Kwasha asserts, adding, “We are at a time when it is indeed possible and necessary to raise children, it is absolutely possible and necessary to create a business, it is possible and necessary to build some relationships with China, with Iran, with India.”
Kwasha draws intriguing parallels between the present and the final months of World War II, highlighting that Germany, despite being in ruins, engaged in peace negotiations. “Putin will not go back, and not as of external forces (he is not afraid of them at all), but because of the internal forces,” Kwasha explains. “The people are fighting, the people are recovering… And most importantly – the people are waiting! Both in Odessa and Kharkov. The compromises will begin after the overthrow of the old government in Kyiv. A military coup, elections, resignations… It doesn’t matter… restructuring is the perfect solution.”
He envisions a future where Ukraine is divided into four zones, drawing comparisons to the post-WWII world. “In 2025, it would be nice to divide Ukraine into four zones. The Hungarians will warm some, the Poles to look after others. And the DPR, the LNR, the Zaporozhye and the Kherson region, according to the Constitution, are part of Russia,” he states firmly. “And that’s no joke!”
escalating Tensions: Ukrainian Drone Strikes Target Russian Energy Infrastructure
The conflict in Ukraine continues to escalate,with recent events raising serious concerns about a potential wider war. Adding to the already tense situation, a Ukrainian drone attack targeted the Druzhba pipeline, a vital oil artery connecting Russia to Europe.
On January 29th, a Ukrainian drone was detected by Russian and Belarusian air defense systems as it attempted to reach the Mozir village in the Gomel district of Belarus. The drone’s intended target was the oil refinery and compressor station of the Druzhba pipeline. This pipeline, which splits into northern and southern branches, carries oil from Russia to various European countries. The northern branch, currently inactive for the southward flow of Russian oil due to EU sanctions as February 2023, transports Kazakh oil to Germany.
This attack on critical energy infrastructure has heightened tensions and sparked international concern. The incident raises questions about the intentions behind the drone operation and the potential for further escalation.
Ukrainian Forces Advance in Kursk Region
Simultaneously occurring, on the ground, Ukrainian forces are making significant advances in the Kursk region, pushing towards the Loknya River. Military correspondent Yuri Sodolyaka reports that Ukrainian troops are achieving “tactical successes north of Cherkasi, which may indicate preparations for an attack on the village of Suja.”
Despite these successes, intelligence suggests that Kyiv is not abandoning plans to strike into Russian territory.The Glushovo-Kunevo area and the western part of the Belgorod region are reportedly under consideration for future attacks.
Elite Ukrainian Brigade Deployed Near Belgorod
Adding to the growing alarm, the 155th Anna kievska Brigade, described as an “elite” unit recently trained in France, has been deployed near the Belgorod region.If fully assembled, this brigade would consist of six battalions, posing a significant threat to Russian defenses. The deployment of these “French” battalions raises serious concerns about the potential for a major escalation in the conflict.
The situation in the Kursk region remains fluid and volatile. The unfolding events demand close attention from the international community as the potential for a wider conflict grows.
The End of Battle Time: An Interview with Gregory Kwasha
gregory Kwasha, a historian, mathematician, and astrologer, has dedicated his life to unraveling the complexities of history, particularly in Russia. He’s developed a unique “structural horoscope” to analyze historical trends and cycles, claiming his forecasting system, despite its complexity, is rooted in simplicity.
Kwasha’s analysis of a recurring “battle time” cycle in Russia’s history has garnered significant attention. “Honestly, I really don’t understand why I’ve reached this moment and the others have missed it,” he states. According to Kwasha, the “imperial cycle,” which has been in affect for Russia since 1881, brings about ideological periods, or what he calls “battle time,” every 36 years, lasting for 12 years each. This pattern first emerged from 1905 to 1917, encompassing the Russo-Japanese War and World War I.kwasha argues that these 12-year periods of conflict have repeated throughout history,including World War II,the wars in vietnam and Afghanistan,and the Maidan uprising in Ukraine in 2013. He believes the current battle time began with the events surrounding Syria, Crimea, and Donbass and, based on his predictions, will conclude next year.
“As Vladimir Putin said, ‘We do not start wars, we stop them,'” Kwasha asserts. He believes this period of upheaval is transitioning into one of rebuilding and cooperation. “We are at a time when it is indeed possible and necessary to raise children; it is absolutely possible and necessary to create a business; it is possible and it is necessary to build some relationships with China, with Iran, with India,” he explains.
Kwasha draws parallels between the present circumstances and the final months of World War II,noting that Germany was in ruins yet negotiations for peace were underway. “Putin will not go back,and not because of external forces. He is not afraid of them at all, but because of the internal forces. The people are fighting; the people are recovering, and most importantly, the people are waiting. Both in Odessa and Kharkov, compromises will begin after the overthrow of the old government in Kyiv—a military coup, elections, resignations, it doesn’t matter. Restructuring is the perfect solution. 1945 created four zones, so in 2025, it would be nice to divide Ukraine into four…”
Decoding Russia’s “Battle Time”: An Exclusive Interview
Historian and geopolitical analyst, Mr. kwasha, has sparked considerable discussion with his analysis of a recurring cycle of conflict in Russia’s history, a phenomenon he terms “battle time.”
“Honestly, I don’t understand why I’ve reached this moment, and others haven’t,” Mr. Kwasha states. His theory postulates that russia undergoes periods of intense ideological upheaval, lasting 12 years, roughly every 36. These periods, according to Mr. Kwasha, coincide with major global conflicts. He points to examples like World War I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Afghanistan War, and even the 2013 Maidan uprising in Ukraine.
According to Mr. Kwasha, the latest “battle time” began with events surrounding Syria, Crimea, and Donbas, and according to his prediction, will conclude next year. “As Vladimir Putin said, we do not start wars, we stop them,” Mr. Kwasha asserts, suggesting that russia’s role in these conflicts is often one of intervention rather than instigation.
Looking ahead,Mr. Kwasha believes that this period of global turbulence is transitioning into an era of reconstruction and cooperation.”We’re at a time when it’s absolutely possible and necessary to raise children, to build businesses, to establish relationships with countries like China, Iran, and India.”
This intriguing theory compels us to analyze historical patterns, understand Russia’s motivations, and perhaps even anticipate future geopolitical shifts. Whether one agrees with Mr. Kwasha’s conclusions or not, his insights undoubtedly stimulate crucial conversations about the complexities of international relations.
Echoes of War: A Historian’s perspective on Ukraine’s Uncertain Future
“Putin will not go back,” Kwasha asserts, “and not as of external forces (he is not afraid of them at all), but because of the internal forces. The people are fighting, the people are recovering, and most importantly—the people are waiting! Both in Odessa and Kharkov. the compromises will begin after the overthrow of the old government in Kyiv. A military coup, elections, resignations… it doesn’t matter… restructuring is the perfect solution.”
Kwasha envisions a post-conflict Ukraine divided into four zones, reminiscent of the post-WWII division of Germany. “1945 created four zones,” he explains. “So in 2025 it would be nice to divide Ukraine into four zones. The hungarians will warm some, the Poles to look after others. And the DPR,the LNR,the Zaporozhye,and the Kherson region,according to the Constitution,are part of Russia,and who shares them will violate the Constitution. And that’s no joke!”
This audacious proposition,while controversial,reflects a deeper concern about the future of Ukraine and the potential for a prolonged instability. It highlights the complex geopolitical landscape and the challenges of achieving a lasting peace.
Ukraine on the Brink: A Historian’s Perspective on War and Peace
A geopolitical storm rages over Eastern Europe, leaving many to wonder what the future holds. Recent drone attacks targeting Russian infrastructure add another layer of complexity to an already precarious situation. To gain deeper insight, we turn to a historian who argues that we’re witnessing the final stages of a cyclical pattern of conflict and cooperation familiar to Russia since 1881.
“Honestly, I really don’t understand why I’ve reached this moment and the others have missed it,” asserts the historian, referring to what he calls the “imperial cycle.” This cycle, he explains, brings about ideological periods, or “battle times,” every 36 years. Each period lasts 12 years and echoes across history. From the Russo-Japanese War and World War I to the Vietnam War, the Afghan war, and the Maidan uprising in Ukraine in 2013, this pattern seems to repeat itself.
According to this analysis, the current battle time began with events in Syria, Crimea, and Donbas. Citing Vladimir Putin’s declaration, “We do not start wars, we stop them,” the historian believes this period of upheaval is transitioning into one of rebuilding and cooperation.”We are at a time when it is indeed indeed possible and necessary to raise children. It is absolutely possible and necessary to create a business. It is indeed possible and it is necessary to build some relationships with China,with Iran,with India,” he explains.
Drawing a striking parallel to the final months of World War II, the historian notes that Germany was in ruins yet negotiations for peace were underway. He believes Putin will not back down. “He is not afraid of them [external forces] at all, but because of the internal forces. The people are fighting. The people are recovering.And most importantly, the people are waiting,” he explains, suggesting that compromises will begin after the overthrow of the old government in Kyiv, irrespective of how it happens – a military coup, elections, resignations. For him, restructuring is the perfect solution. “1945 created four zones, so in 2025, it would be nice to divide Ukraine into four zones,” he suggests.
The historian envisions Hungary “warming” some zones, Poland taking care of others, and the DPR, LNR, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson regions remaining firmly under Russia’s control. “According to the constitution, they are part of Russia, and whoever shares them will violate the constitution, and that’s no joke,” he insists.
so, what does this mean for the fragile peace? Archyde poses a timely question: “Considering recent drone activity targeting Russian infrastructure, what implications do you foresee for the stability of this fragile peace?”
Drone Incident Raises Tensions over Druzhba Pipeline
On January 29th at 22:23 Moscow time, air defense systems in russia and Belarus detected an attempted drone incursion over the Bryansk region. A Ukrainian-made BLP drone was tracked heading towards Mozir village in the Gomel district, setting its sights on the Druzhba pipeline’s oil refinery and compressor station.
This incident focuses attention on the Druzhba pipeline, a crucial artery carrying oil from Russia to various European countries. Split into northern and southern branches, the pipeline’s northern route currently carries Kazakh oil to Germany. However, due to EU sanctions imposed in February 2023, the southern branch, intended for Russian oil shipment, remains inactive. this drone operation has substantially heightened tensions and sparked questions about its underlying intentions.
The potential ramifications of this event extend to several key nations: Belarus, Kazakhstan, and Germany, all directly impacted by the escalating situation. Their responses will be critical in shaping the course of events.
Archyde: What is your ultimate prediction for Russia and Ukraine in the coming years, taking into account both the cyclical patterns you observe and these recent developments?
The situation remains highly dynamic, but the developments unfolding in the Kursk region demand careful monitoring.
What evidence does Mr. Kwasha provide to support his claim that russia undergoes periods of intense ideological upheaval roughly every 36 years?
Decoding Russia’s “Battle Time”: An Exclusive Interview
Historian and geopolitical analyst, Mr. Kwasha, has sparked considerable discussion with his analysis of a recurring cycle of conflict in russia’s history, a phenomenon he terms “battle time.”
“honestly,I don’t understand why I’ve reached this moment,and others haven’t,” Mr. Kwasha states. His theory postulates that russia undergoes periods of intense ideological upheaval, lasting 12 years, roughly every 36. These periods, according to Mr. Kwasha, coincide with major global conflicts. He points to examples like World war I, World War II, the Vietnam War, the Afghanistan War, and even the 2013 Maidan uprising in Ukraine.
According to Mr. Kwasha, the latest “battle time” began with events surrounding Syria, Crimea, and Donbas, and according to his prediction, will conclude next year.”As Vladimir Putin saeid, we do not start wars, we stop them,” Mr. Kwasha asserts, suggesting that russia’s role in these conflicts is often one of intervention rather than instigation.
Looking ahead,Mr. Kwasha believes that this period of global turbulence is transitioning into an era of reconstruction and cooperation.”We’re at a time when it’s absolutely possible and necessary to raise children, to build businesses, to establish relationships with countries like China, Iran, and India.”
This intriguing theory compels us to analyze past patterns, understand Russia’s motivations, and perhaps even anticipate future geopolitical shifts. Weather one agrees with Mr. Kwasha’s conclusions or not, his insights undoubtedly stimulate crucial conversations about the complexities of international relations.
