unrwa: the Implications of Israel’s Ban
Table of Contents
the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) has been forced to uproot international staff from Israel following the country’s ban on the agency. This move, officially implemented on January 26th, 2025, risks crippling aid delivery to Palestinians, notably in the Gaza Strip.
Despite the UN flag still flying above UNRWA’s headquarters in Jerusalem,Palestinian employees opted to stay away due to security concerns spurred by planned “celebrations” by right-wing Israeli groups outside.
While UNRWA spokesperson Juliette Touma affirmed that they remain committed to continuing operations in Gaza and the West Bank,” she emphasized the lack of clarity surrounding the ban’s implementation,stating,”We are in the dark. We have not received any instructions from Israel how the ban will be enforced beyond being told to vacate.”
The Israeli Supreme Court’s rejection of a petition by the Palestinian human rights group Adalah, challenging the ban, paved the way for this action. The court acknowledged that the legislation, which prohibits UNRWA activity in Israeli sovereign territory, does not explicitly extend to Gaza or the West Bank. However, the ban does cover East Jerusalem, where UNRWA operates a field headquarters.
The ban’s most concerning aspect is its potential to disrupt aid shipments to gaza. As UNRWA is the largest aid provider in Gaza, its trucks frequently enough rely on coordination with Israeli authorities to cross into the territory. This,according to Touma,could jeopardize the fragile ceasefire:
“If [the ban means] no contact at an operational level then the fate of the ceasefire is in serious jeopardy becuase we are the most serious player and biggest deliverer of aid.”
while the ramifications of the ban remain unclear, it’s undeniable that UNRWA’s work in providing essential services like healthcare and education to Palestinians, particularly in Gaza, faces serious challenges. UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini underscored the agency’s vital role, stating that its capacity to distribute aid “far exceeds that of any other entity”, and criticized Israel’s actions as a “relentless assault … harming the lives and future of Palestinians across the occupied Palestinian territory”.
The history of tension between Israel and UNRWA is long and fraught. Israel has long argued that UNRWA’s existence perpetuates the Palestinian refugee crisis. These tensions escalated after Hamas’s attack on Israel in October 2023, leading to accusations of UNRWA personnel involvement in the assault. This latest move further exacerbates an already volatile situation, raising concerns about the fate of Palestinians who rely heavily on UNRWA for survival.
what specific measures could be taken to mitigate the harm to palestinians, particularly in Gaza, as a result of the UNRWA ban?
UNRWA Ban: A Crisis in Gaza? An Interview with nadia Khalil
The UN’s Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) has faced a major setback following Israel’s ban on its activities within Israeli sovereign territory, casting a shadow of uncertainty over essential aid deliveries to Palestinians, particularly in the Gaza Strip. Archyde sat down with Nadia Khalil, a senior Palestinian political analyst and expert on humanitarian aid, to discuss the implications of this recent advancement.
Interview with Nadia Khalil
Archyde: Ms. Khalil, can you shed some light on the impact of Israel’s ban on UNRWA operations?
Nadia Khalil: The ban is a grave concern. UNRWA is the largest provider of aid in Gaza, responsible for education, healthcare, and critical assistance for a population already facing immense hardship. Their withdrawal significantly jeopardizes the already fragile situation in gaza.
Archyde: What specific challenges do you foresee arising from this ban, particularly concerning aid delivery to Gaza?
Nadia Khalil: The most pressing issue is the disruption of UNRWA’s logistical operations.They rely heavily on coordination with Israeli authorities for the passage of aid shipments into Gaza. If this contact is severed,it could have catastrophic consequences,potentially exacerbating existing shortages of essential goods and hindering efforts to rebuild after past conflicts.
Archyde: How does this ban amplify existing tensions between Israel and UNRWA?
Nadia Khalil: The ban reflects a long-standing mistrust and disagreement between Israel and UNRWA. Israel views the agency’s existence as perpetuating the Palestinian refugee crisis, while UNRWA argues that it’s providing essential services to a vulnerable population whose rights have been denied for decades. This ban pushes these tensions to a boiling point, undermining international efforts for a peaceful resolution.
Archyde: The Israeli Supreme Court’s decision cleared the way for this ban. Do you think this decision sets a dangerous precedent?
Nadia Khalil: Absolutely. It sends a chilling message to international organizations operating in conflict zones, raising concerns about their ability to carry out their vital work without undue interference.
Archyde: Given the potential consequences for Palestinian civilians, what concrete steps do you beleive are necessary to address this crisis?
Nadia Khalil: Pressure must be exerted on Israel to reverse its decision.The international community, including the UN Security Council, needs to unequivocally condemn this ban and demand that Israel uphold its international obligations towards Palestinian refugees. Simultaneously, we need to strengthen choice channels to deliver aid to Gaza, but frankly, no alternative can truly replace the vital role UNRWA plays.
What are your thoughts on the potential impact of this ban on the already fragile humanitarian situation in Gaza? Share your views in the comments below.