After the recovery of the missing student, the Islamabad High Court declared the police report unsatisfactory and called for a detailed report. The sensitive institutions were also directed to submit a detailed report on tracking mobile numbers and vehicles.
Justice Babar Sattar remarked that the case does not end when the kidnapper returns. Where did it go? The police are not qualified to come to court and tell the truth, you want a seventeen year old to tell the truth? Then let me proceed by making the intelligence agencies a party.
On September 4, the Islamabad High Court had ordered the Inspector General (IG) Islamabad to contact the sensitive agency in the recovery case of the missing Usman Faizan. , the man was picked up but no one including the Station House Officer (SHO) knows.
A day earlier, the court had directed the IG Islamabad to trace the phone number and vehicle of the kidnapped Usman Faizan.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
Justice Babar Sattar of Islamabad High Court had given the IG Islamabad time till September 11 to recover Faizan Usman. Justice Babar Sattar will hear the Faizan Usman case on September 11.
Justice Babar Sattar of the Islamabad High Court expressed his indignation over the non-proceeding of the investigation after the recovery of the missing Faizan Usman and summoned the IG Islamabad to court immediately and said, “Was there any ambiguity in my order?”
IG Islamabad replied that there was no ambiguity, had spoken to all intelligence agencies. Wrote to PTA and IB for data of two numbers. Analysis of CDR is coming, IB and PTA have asked internet protocol detail record.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
The IG Police said that after the return of the missing Faizan Usman, the SP, investigator, SHO went to his father six times, but we were not allowed to meet the boy. I have also met the heads of the intelligence agencies.
Justice Babar Sattar said that the police do not have the ability to come to the court and speak the truth, you want a seventeen-year-old to speak the truth? Then let me proceed by making the intelligence agencies a party.
You are a uniformed officer, think about it. Another officer comes and tells that a video of the boy was received. Within two minutes it is known from which IP the video was uploaded.
IG Islamabad said that we have had a meeting with PTA to trace the Twitter account. The court said that you should have given a report as to whose the vehicles belonged to. Is it the incompetence of the police or the police do not want to do this? The IG said that the police is neither incompetent nor ineffective.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
The Additional Attorney General said it was a request for recovery, if the person returned, dispose of the request.
Justice Babar Sattar said: Who has told you that the application for recovery becomes ineffective when the servant returns? Families are threatened when people are picked up. All the concerned agencies should submit a detailed report to the court within 7 days, conduct an investigation involving the returning Faizan and present it before the court. Iman Mazari pleaded that the kidnapping is highly dramatized and should not be investigated at present.
#Recovery #Missing #Student #Strong #Remarks #Islamabad #High #Court #Pakistan
2024-09-12 11:10:46
Table of Contents
Faizan Usman Case: Islamabad High Court Demands Accountability from Police and Intelligence Agencies
The recent case of Faizan Usman, a 17-year-old student who was forcibly disappeared from Islamabad’s Green Avenue on July 5, has taken a dramatic turn. After his recovery, the Islamabad High Court has expressed its dissatisfaction with the police report and has demanded a detailed report on the tracking of mobile numbers and vehicles involved in the incident [[2]].
Justice Babar Sattar, while hearing the case, remarked that the case does not end with the recovery of the missing person, but rather, it is essential to investigate how it happened and who was involved [[3]]. The court has directed the police to provide a detailed report on the incident, including the tracking of mobile numbers and vehicles, and has also summoned the Inspector General (IG) Islamabad to court.
The IG Islamabad reported that they had spoken to all intelligence agencies and had written to the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) and the Intelligence Bureau (IB) to obtain data on two numbers involved in the incident. However, the court was not satisfied with the progress of the investigation, and Justice Babar Sattar questioned the ability of the police to come to court and tell the truth.
The IG Islamabad also stated that they had met with the heads of the intelligence agencies, but the court was not convinced, and Justice Babar Sattar said that the police do not have the ability to come to court and speak the truth [[3]]. The IG Islamabad had been given time until September 11 to recover Faizan Usman, but even after his recovery, the investigation seemed to be progressing at a slow pace.
Faizan Usman’s case has highlighted the issue of enforced disappearances in Pakistan, with many calling for accountability from the authorities. The Islamabad High Court’s decision to summon the IG Islamabad and demand a detailed report on the incident is a step in the right direction.
It is essential that the authorities take concrete steps to investigate the incident and bring those responsible to justice. The case of Faizan Usman is not an isolated incident, and it is a reminder of the need for accountability and transparency in the country’s security agencies.
the Faizan Usman case is a test for the authorities to demonstrate their commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens. The Islamabad High Court’s decision to demand accountability from the police and intelligence agencies is a welcome step, and it is hoped that it will lead to a thorough investigation and justice for the victims of enforced disappearances.
References:
<a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/pakistan/comments/1f8neug/faizanusmancase/”>[3]
Faizan Usman Abduction Case: Islamabad High Court Orders Detailed Report and Questions Police Investigation
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) has ordered the Inspector General (IG) Islamabad to submit a detailed report on the alleged abduction of 18-year-old Faizan Usman, who was recovered recently. The court has also directed sensitive institutions to provide a report on tracking mobile numbers and vehicles involved in the case[[[1]].
Faizan Usman was reportedly taken on July 5 by men in black uniforms and civilian clothes without any warrant. His father filed a petition in the IHC, which led to the court ordering the IG Islamabad to recover the missing teenager [[2]]. On September 4, the IHC had directed the IG Islamabad to contact the sensitive agency in the recovery case of Faizan Usman [[3]].
After Faizan Usman’s recovery, Justice Babar Sattar of the Islamabad High Court expressed his indignation over the non-proceeding of the investigation and summoned the IG Islamabad to court immediately. The IG Islamabad replied that there was no ambiguity in the court’s order and that they had spoken to all intelligence agencies, written to PTA and IB for data of two numbers, and were analyzing the CDR.
Justice Babar Sattar remarked that the case does not end when the kidnapper returns and questioned the police’s ability to come to court and tell the truth. He also expressed his frustration over the police’s incompetence in tracing the phone number and vehicle of the kidnapped Faizan Usman. The IG Islamabad said that they had met with the heads of intelligence agencies and were tracing the Twitter account involved in the case.
The Islamabad High Court had given the IG Islamabad time till September 11 to recover Faizan Usman, and the court will hear the case again on September 11. The court’s decisions and Justice Babar Sattar’s remarks suggest that the investigation into Faizan Usman’s abduction is far from over, and the authorities need to do more to uncover the truth behind the incident.
the Faizan Usman abduction case has raised serious concerns about the safety and security of citizens in Islamabad, and the Islamabad High Court’s intervention is a step towards ensuring that justice is served. The court’s orders and the police’s responses will be closely watched as the investigation unfolds.
References:
