The Islamabad High Court directed PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to land in Islamabad and stopped the security agencies from arresting the petitioner on his return to the country. The court said that no security agency should arrest Mubeen Arif on his return home.
Islamabad High Court Justice Babar Sattar heard the petition to remove the name of PTI MNA Mubeen Arif from the passport control list. Rizwan Akhtar Awan Advocate on behalf of the petitioner, Additional Attorney General Manoor Iqbal Dogul appeared in the court on behalf of the Federation.
Imran Khan was arrested in the biggest case of terrorism
DG Immigration and Passport Mustafa Jamal Qazi appeared on the court notice and said that generally the name is included in the PCL at the request of the agencies. The court inquired under which law do you put their names in this list? This is the jurisdiction of the federal cabinet. How do you use it?
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
DG Passports said that the authority has been delegated by the federal cabinet, it is written in the rules, under rules 22, we put the names in the list.
Justice Babar Sattar said, DG sir, give a detailed report. If I come to the conclusion that you are misusing the authority, there will be consequences, so the answer to be submitted should be done carefully. Further hearing of the case was adjourned till next week.
It should be noted that after the May 9 riots, the names of dozens of people, including the PTI chairman, were put in the no-fly list.
However, on April 22 this year, the names of members of the federal cabinet during the PTI regime were removed from the exit control list, while PTI founder Imran Khan, his wife Bushra Bibi, the former woman’s close friend Farah Gogi and P. The names of senior TI leader, former Special Assistant to Overseas Pakistanis Zulfi Bukhari, were retained on the ECL.
#Islamabad #High #Court #orders #security #agencies #arrest #Mubeen #Arif #Pakistan
2024-09-12 21:36:51
What were the reasons behind the Islamabad High Court’s decision to allow PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to return to Pakistan without fear of arrest?
Table of Contents
- 1 What were the reasons behind the Islamabad High Court’s decision to allow PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to return to Pakistan without fear of arrest?
- 2 Here are some PAA (People Also Ask) related questions for the title: **Islamabad High Court Directs PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to Return to Pakistan Without Fear of Arrest**:
Islamabad High Court Directs PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to Return to Pakistan Without Fear of Arrest
In a significant development, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has directed PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to return to Pakistan without fear of arrest, stating that no security agency should detain him upon his return to the country [[3]]. This decision comes as a relief to Arif, who had been facing the threat of arrest upon his return to Pakistan.
The IHC’s decision was made in response to a petition filed by Arif, seeking the removal of his name from the Passport Control List (PCL). Justice Babar Sattar heard the petition, with Rizwan Akhtar Awan Advocate representing Arif and Additional Attorney General Manoor Iqbal Dogul appearing on behalf of the Federation.
During the hearing, DG Immigration and Passport Mustafa Jamal Qazi stated that names are typically included in the PCL at the request of security agencies, citing Rule 22 of the relevant regulations. However, Justice Sattar expressed skepticism, questioning the legal basis for including names in the list and warning that there would be consequences if misuse of authority was found.
The court has since adjourned the case, with the DG Passports directed to submit a detailed report on the matter. The IHC’s decision is a significant development in the case, and its outcome will be closely watched by political observers and legal experts alike.
In related news, President Dr. Arif Alvi recently administered the oath of office to Justice Aamer Farooq as the new Chief Justice of the Islamabad High Court [[1]]. Meanwhile, PTI’s youngest parliamentarian has been making waves in political circles, with a recent interview highlighting their rise to prominence [[2]].
The IHC’s decision in the Mubeen Arif case serves as a reminder of the critical role that the judiciary plays in upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens in Pakistan. As the case continues to unfold, it is likely to have significant implications for the country’s political landscape.
Islamabad High Court Directs PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to Return to Pakistan Without Fear of Arrest
In a significant development, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has directed PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to return to Pakistan without fear of arrest, stating that no security agency should detain him upon his return to the country [[3]]. This decision comes as a relief to Arif, who had been facing the threat of arrest upon his return to Pakistan.
The IHC’s decision was made in response to a petition filed by Arif, seeking the removal of his name from the Passport Control List (PCL). Justice Babar Sattar heard the petition, with Rizwan Akhtar Awan Advocate representing Arif and Additional Attorney General Manoor Iqbal Dogul appearing on behalf of the Federation.
During the hearing, DG Immigration and Passport Mustafa Jamal Qazi stated that names are typically included in the PCL at the request of security agencies, citing Rule 22 of the relevant regulations. However, Justice Sattar expressed skepticism, questioning the legal basis for including names in the list and warning that there would be consequences if misuse of authority was found.
The court has since adjourned the case, with the DG Passports directed to submit a detailed report on the matter. The IHC’s decision is a significant development in the case, and its outcome will be closely watched by political observers and legal experts alike.
Background of the Case
Mubeen Arif, a Pakistani politician and member of the National Assembly of Pakistan [[2]], had been facing the threat of arrest upon his return to Pakistan. His name was included in the PCL, which had restricted his travel and caused uncertainty about his future.
Reasons Behind the IHC’s Decision
The IHC’s decision to allow Mubeen Arif to return to Pakistan without fear of arrest is significant, as it highlights the court’s commitment to upholding the law and protecting individual rights. The court’s skepticism about the legal basis for including names in the PCL and its warning of consequences for misuse of authority are important indicators of its determination to ensure accountability and transparency in the system.
Implications of the Decision
The IHC’s decision has significant implications for Mubeen Arif and others who have been facing similar circumstances. It sets a precedent for the court’s willingness to challenge arbitrary decisions and protect individual rights. The decision also highlights the importance of accountability and transparency in the system, and serves as a reminder to security agencies to respect the law and follow due process.
Conclusion
the Islamabad High Court’s decision to allow PTI MNA Mubeen Arif to return to Pakistan without fear of arrest is a significant development in the case. It highlights the court’s commitment to upholding the law and protecting individual rights, and sets a precedent for future cases. The decision’s implications are far-reaching, and will be closely watched by political observers and legal experts alike.
References
[1] No security agency should arrest PTI MNA Mubeen Arif: IHC (https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/1229574-upon-return-to-pakistan-no-security-agency-should-arrest-pti-mna-mubeen-arif-ihc)
[2] Chaudhary Mubeen Arif Jutt (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChaudharyMubeenArif_Jutt)
[3] Islamabad High Court (https://ihc.gov.pk/)
