Under the nuclear deal, the period of embargo on the sale and purchase of weapons by the United Nations on Iran has ended.
Under the 2015 nuclear deal, the UN arms embargo on Iran was supposed to expire after 5 years.
Iran says it is ready to buy and sell weapons, the Iranian delegate to the United Nations says that the United States unilaterally withdrew from the deal and was left alone.
What was agreed in the nuclear deal?
In July 2015, under the ‘Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action’ signed by six world powers, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia and China, with Iran, Iran had agreed to stop its nuclear program. It would limit stockpiles of enriched uranium used as fuel and nuclear weapons in reactors for 15 years, while gradually reducing the number of centrifuges used for uranium enrichment over a 10-year period. .
According to the British Broadcasting Corporation, Iran also agreed to replace the heavy water facility so that it could not produce plutonium, the material used in a bomb.
In exchange for accepting all these conditions, the economic sanctions imposed on Iran by the United Nations, the United States and the European Union were lifted.
Iran has always insisted that its nuclear program is entirely for peaceful purposes and that it abides by the nuclear deal, which is also certified by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
However, in May 2018, the United States announced its withdrawal from the nuclear deal with Iran.
#Irans #arms #embargo #ended
**Interview with Dr. Sarah Khatami, Middle East Analyst**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Khatami. The recent expiration of the UN arms embargo on Iran has raised significant concerns and discussions internationally. What implications do you see this development having on regional security?
**Dr. Khatami:** Thank you for having me. The end of the arms embargo indeed marks a pivotal moment in Middle Eastern geopolitics. With Iran now able to formally buy and sell weapons, we might see an increase in its military capabilities, which could shift the balance of power in the region. Allies and adversaries alike, especially in the Gulf, will be closely monitoring Tehran’s next moves.
**Editor:** Given that the United States unilaterally withdrew from the nuclear deal in 2018, how do you think this has influenced Iran’s current stance and its assertiveness on the global stage?
**Dr. Khatami:** The U.S. withdrawal has certainly emboldened Iran. By framing the situation as the U.S. isolating itself, Iran is positioning itself as a victor, ready to re-enter the global arms market. This could enhance its leverage in negotiations, both regionally and internationally, as they seek to redefine their role in a post-embargo landscape.
**Editor:** What do you think the international community’s response should be to Iran’s indication of wanting to expand its military inventory?
**Dr. Khatami:** The response should be multifaceted. Diplomatic engagement must be prioritized to contain any potential arms race. However, it’s also essential for nations, especially those in the Gulf, to assess their own security arrangements and consider collaborative defense strategies that could deter Iranian influence.
**Editor:** This situation certainly poses a dilemma for policymakers. How do you believe ordinary citizens across the globe view the return of arms transactions in Iran? Do you foresee a public debate regarding the balance between national security and international diplomacy?
**Dr. Khatami:** Absolutely. I believe many people will have mixed feelings. On one hand, there’s a legitimate concern over the potential for increased conflict. On the other, there’s a strong narrative about a nation’s right to self-defense and sovereignty. I anticipate a robust debate, which may reveal a deeper divide on how to address Iran’s military capabilities and the broader implications for global peace and security.
**Editor:** Thank you for your insights, Dr. Khatami. As we consider these developments, we encourage our readers to reflect on their opinions: How do you think the end of the arms embargo on Iran will affect regional stability, and what measures should the international community pursue in response?