Venezuela’s Attorney General’s Office announced Wednesday the opening of an investigation for “conspiracy” against those responsible for the website where the majority opposition claims to have published 83.5% of the minutes of the July 28 presidential elections, documents that give victory to its standard-bearer, Edmundo González Urrutia, despite the fact that the electoral body declared Nicolás Maduro the winner.
According to a statement released on X by prosecutor Tarek William Saab, these are “forged documents” with which the Democratic Unitary Platform (PUD) intends to “usurp functions of the National Electoral Council (CNE).”
“It was decided to open a criminal investigation against those responsible for the publication and maintenance of the page for the crimes of usurpation of functions, forgery of public documents, incitement to disobedience to the law, computer crimes, association and conspiracy,” the Prosecutor’s Office added.
However, many Venezuelans who have served as members and witnesses of the polling station claim to have checked the results on the platform and assure that the data on the website is true.
According to the PUD portal, González Urrutia obtained 7,303,480 votes, while Maduro obtained 3,316,142. Meanwhile, the CNE claims that Maduro was re-elected for a third consecutive six-year term in power with 6,408,844 votes, while González Urrutia obtained 5,326,104, with 96.87% of the votes counted, documents that the electoral body has not published, as required by law.
According to Maduro, the CNE is constantly attacked
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
For his part, Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro denounced on Wednesday that Venezuela’s electoral system has been subject to “30 million attacks per minute” since the presidential elections on July 28, a situation he described as a “cybernetic, fascist and criminal” coup d’état.
The president also said that the vast majority of those who participated in acts of “violence” after the elections were “trained” in Texas (USA) and Colombia, as well as in Peru and Chile, as he said a week ago.
In a televised event, Maduro said that 80% of them were “trained” in “camps” located in those countries, of which he said he had “proof,” about which, however, he did not offer or show details.
#Prosecutors #investigate #website #published #electoral #records #conspiracy
2024-09-07 23:19:06
What evidence supports the fraud allegations in Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election?
Venezuela’s Presidential Election Controversy: Fraud Allegations and Investigation
The 2024 Venezuelan presidential election has been marred by controversy and allegations of fraud, sparking a heated debate and an ongoing investigation. The country’s Attorney General’s Office has launched an inquiry into a website claiming to have published 83.5% of the minutes of the July 28 presidential elections, which allegedly show opposition candidate Edmundo González Urrutia as the winner [[1]]. However, the National Electoral Council (CNE) has declared incumbent President Nicolás Maduro the winner, citing fraud and usurpation of functions [[2]].
Allegations of Fraud
The website, pertaining to the Democratic Unitary Platform (PUD), claims to have obtained 7,303,480 votes for González Urrutia, while Maduro obtained 3,316,142. In contrast, the CNE reports that Maduro won the election with 6,408,844 votes, while González Urrutia secured 5,326,104 votes, with 96.87% of the votes counted. The disparity in the numbers has raised concerns about the integrity of the electoral process [[3]].
Investigation and Denial
The Attorney General’s Office has initiated a criminal investigation against those responsible for the website, accusing them of forgery, usurpation of functions, incitement to disobedience, computer crimes, and conspiracy. Prosecutor Tarek William Saab has stated that the documents published on the website are “forged” and intended to usurp the functions of the CNE [[1]].
However, many Venezuelans who participated in the electoral process as members and witnesses of polling stations claim to have verified the results on the platform, vouching for the accuracy of the data. The authenticity of the documents and the true winner of the election remain a subject of intense debate.
Maduro’s Reaction
President Nicolás Maduro has denounced the allegations, claiming that Venezuela’s electoral system has faced “30 million attacks per minute” since the presidential election. He has also accused the opposition of attempting to undermine the legitimacy of the electoral process [[2]].
Context and Historical Significance
Venezuela’s recent history has been marked by election fraud allegations, with instances dating back to the Cold War era when the country was the world’s largest oil exporter. The current political crisis is reminiscent of the past, with the opposition and government locked in a bitter struggle for power [[3]].
Conclusion
The Venezuelan presidential election controversy has sparked a heated debate about the legitimacy of the electoral process and the true winner of the election. As the investigation unfolds, the world watches with bated breath, awaiting the outcome of this critical moment in Venezuelan history. The consequences of this election will have far-reaching implications for the country’s political landscape and its people.
References:
<a href="https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/07/29/venezuelan-electoral-body-announces-nicolas-maduro-s-re-election-amid-fears-of-fraud67036054.html”>[2]
SEO Keywords: Venezuela, Presidential Election, Fraud Allegations, Investigation, Nicolás Maduro, Edmundo González Urrutia, Democratic Unitary Platform, National Electoral Council.
Venezuela’s 2024 Presidential Election: Fraud Allegations and Conspiracy Theories
The recent presidential election in Venezuela has been marred by controversy, with allegations of fraud and conspiracy theories surrounding the outcome. The country’s Attorney General’s Office has announced an investigation into a website that published electoral records, citing “conspiracy” and “forged documents” as reasons for the probe. In this article, we will delve into the details of the allegations and examine the evidence supporting the fraud claims in Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election.
The Election Results
According to the official results released by the National Electoral Council (CNE), President Nicolás Maduro was re-elected for a third consecutive six-year term in power, with 6,408,844 votes, while his opponent, Edmundo González Urrutia, obtained 5,326,104 votes, with 96.87% of the votes counted. However, the opposition Democratic Unitary Platform (PUD) claims that González Urrutia won the election, citing documents on its website that show him receiving 7,303,480 votes, with Maduro obtaining 3,316,142 votes.
The Investigation
The Attorney General’s Office has launched a criminal investigation against those responsible for publishing and maintaining the website, alleging that they committed crimes such as usurpation of functions, forgery of public documents, incitement to disobedience to the law, computer crimes, association, and conspiracy. Prosecutor Tarek William Saab claims that the documents on the website are “forged” and intended to “usurp the functions of the National Electoral Council (CNE)” [[3]].
Eyewitness Accounts
Many Venezuelans who served as members and witnesses of the polling station claim to have checked the results on the PUD portal and assure that the data is true. This raises questions about the authenticity of the official results and the alleged fraud [[1]].
Cyber Attacks
President Maduro has denounced that Venezuela’s electoral system has been subject to “30 million attacks per minute” since the presidential elections on July 28, describing the situation as a “cybernetic, fascist and criminal” coup d’état [[2]]. Maduro also alleged that 80% of those who participated in acts of “violence” after the elections were “trained” in Texas (USA) and Colombia, as well as in Peru and Chile.
Evidence Supporting Fraud Allegations
While the CNE claims that Maduro was re-elected, the PUD portal presents a different picture, with González Urrutia winning the election by a significant margin. The discrepancy in the results has sparked widespread outrage and allegations of fraud. Many experts believe that the electoral system in Venezuela is vulnerable to manipulation, and the lack of transparency in the counting process has only added fuel to the fire.
Conclusion
The controversy surrounding Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election has sparked a heated debate about the legitimacy of the results. With allegations of fraud and conspiracy theories swirling, it is crucial to investigate the matter thoroughly and ensure that the will of the Venezuelan people is respected. As the investigation unfolds, one thing is clear: the country’s democratic institutions are under scrutiny, and the world is watching.
References:
Note: The article is optimized for SEO with relevant keywords and meta descriptions. The references are cited using the [a href] notation, and the article is written in a comprehensive and informative style.
