A new one research Intermittent fasting or intermittent fasting Health But the alleged benefits have been challenged. This is a popular one Food is often praised by celebrities and health advice gurus.
Intermittent fasting is a popular practice in which you eat all of your food in eight hours and fast for the remaining 16 hours of the day.
However, in a study published by the American Heart Association on Monday, March 18, it has been revealed that limiting eating hours to only eight hours a day can reduce the risk of heart disease. Diseases because of Death The risk increases to 91 percent.
Researchers led by Dr. Victor Zhong of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine analyzed nearly 20,000 adults in the United States with an average age of 49 who followed intermittent fasting, also known as the 16:8 plan.
Presented at the AHA Epidemiology and Prevention Conference, Chicago, Illinois. According to the study, people who restricted their eating to eight hours a day were 91 percent more likely to die from heart disease than those who ate for 12 or 16 hours a day.
Among participants with pre-existing heart disease, eating between eight and 10 hours a day increased their risk of dying from heart disease or stroke by 66 percent.
Meanwhile, cancer patients who ate more than 16 hours a day were less likely to die from the disease.
The researchers also found that eating at restricted times did not reduce the overall risk of death from any cause.
“Restricting daily eating time to short periods, such as eight hours a day, has become popular in recent years as a way to lose weight and improve heart health,” said Dr Zhong, senior author of the study.
‘However, the long-term health effects of eating at fixed times are unknown, including the risk of heart disease or death from any cause.’
“We were surprised to find that people who followed an eight-hour eating schedule were more likely to die from heart disease,” he said.
‘Although this type of diet has been popular for its potential short-term benefits, our research clearly shows that short periods of eating compared to 12-16 hours a day are not associated with longer survival. .’
The study analyzed data from participants in the 2003-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and compared it with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Death Index database of deaths in the United States from 2003 to December 2019. Happened until
The researchers acknowledged that the study’s findings were limited because it relied on self-reported dietary information, as well as failing to address other factors that may have contributed to participants’ health.
Dr. Christopher D. Gardner, professor of medicine at Stanford University, says: ‘Overall, this study suggests that eating at scheduled times may have short-term benefits but long-term negative effects. More details of the analysis will be interesting and helpful when the full research is presented.’
This section contains related reference points (Related Nodes field).
“One of these details was the nutritional quality of the specific diets of different subsets of participants. Without this information, it is not possible to determine whether essential nutrient intake might be an alternative explanation for these results,” he said. which are currently focused on specific time periods for meals. Second, it needs to be emphasized that the classification at different times of eating at the given time was determined only on the basis of two days’ intake.’
About half of the participants were male and half were female. About 73 percent of participants were non-Hispanic white adults, while 11 percent were Hispanic. Eight percent of participants were non-Hispanic black adults, and approximately seven percent of adults identified as second-generation.
“It would also be important to compare demographics and baseline characteristics across groups that were divided into different meal periods within a given time frame,” Gardner added.
‘For example, was the group with all restricted eating periods unique compared to those who followed a different eating schedule in terms of weight, stress, traditional cardiometabolic risk factors or other factors?
This additional information will help to better understand the specific effects of short-term feeding described in this interesting summary.’
A similar study in June 2023 analyzed the weight loss outcomes of obese adults who did intermittent fasting compared to a traditional diet.
The results, published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, found that people who ate within an eight-hour time limit had better glucose sensitivity than those in a control group who ate for 10 or more hours a day. consume more time than
Join Independent Urdu’s WhatsApp channel for authentic news and current affairs analysis Click here.
#Intermittent #fasting #increases #risk #death #heart #disease
2024-07-19 10:14:49
