Intel recently launched a new 15th generation CPU “Ultra 200S”, but it was criticized for poor performance. Robert Hallock, Intel’s director of technical marketing, recently admitted that its performance was not as good as expected and a repair patch will be released at the end of this month or early December.
(Previous summary: Huida replaced Intel and became a component stock of the Dow Jones Index; Intel’s Q3 recorded its largest loss in history)
(Background supplement: Intel is hopeless? The 15th generation CPU was “over 104% efficient” by AMD 9800X3D, and the Blue Empire fell)
Intel, once the world’s most valuable semiconductor company, has seen its stock price plummet due to factors such as poor financial reports, massive layoffs, and user class actions. It was recently kicked out of the Dow Jones stock market. In order to reverse the decline, Intel recently approached Samsung and AMD to join hands to form a joint venture. The alliance also launched a new 15th generation CPU “Ultra 200S” in October.
However, after Ultra 200S was launched, it was criticized for its poor performance. Technology channel Geekerwan released the Ultra 200S evaluation results this week, testing the CPU models U5 245K, U7 265K and U9 285K (U9 285K has the highest performance). Directly pointing out that gaming performance is disappointing, Intel’s 14th generation i9 14900K can outperform U5 245K, U7 265K and U9 285K, criticizing Intel as “simply going backwards”.
Intel admits performance is not as good as expected and will launch update as early as the end of this month
In this regard, Robert Hallock, Intel’s director of technical marketing, recently accepted the foreign media HotHardware Exclusive interview,heFranklythe initial benchmark test results of Core Ultra 200S did not meet expectations, saying that the performance decline was due to various problems at the BIOS and OS levels. Although he was unwilling to go into details, it seemed to imply that there were optimization issues with the processor:
I can’t go into detail, but we have identified a series of multifactorial issues at the OS and BIOS level, and I must say that the performance we saw in our reviews was not what we expected and wanted.
Robert Hallock mentioned that Intel is investigating and fixing these issues, and it is expected that the fix should be rolled out at the end of this month or early December, and will be optimized specifically for gaming performance.
At the same time, various board manufacturers issued similar statements, indicating that Intel may be developing a new microcode patch to solve some defects of the Core Ultra 200S processor. The patch was originally expected to be launched shortly after the CPU was released, but it seems that Intel It has now been decided to take more time to release this patch.
Robert Hallock talked about the issue of memory latency and said that although some reviewers have observed that memory latency is quite high in some cases, this is not the root cause of poor game performance. He promised that Intel will provide detailed analysis next and instructions to explain exactly what affects a processor’s gaming performance.
Solving the problem is still difficult to match the 9800X3D
Intel managed to solve the problem to achieve slightly better gaming performance. As a productivity and gaming processor, reaching the performance level of Core i9 14900K is the minimum goal, but even with gaming performance reaching 14900K level, the best U9 285K is available for $629 The price is also difficult to compete with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which has completely disrupted the market.
Compared with the 9800X3D next door, the price has skyrocketed and it is hard to find. Potential buyers looking for the struggling Intel Ultra 200S series will inevitably wait until December to continue to wait and see Intel’s updates. However, the longer it takes, the more likely it will be. Many players who are keen on high-end game processors have already jumped ship.
📍Related reports📍
Huang Renxun smiled! In response to AMD and Intel forming an x86 alliance to fight against Nvidia and Arm: What they are doing is very good
Can Intel be saved? Apollo is rumored to be willing to invest $5 billion to help Intel turn around
The U.S. government “supports Intel” to promote the localization of AI chips. Huang Renxun: TSMC is good but not the only one
Intel’s 15th Generation Flop: A Comedy of Errors
Intel recently launched its new 15th generation CPU “Ultra 200S”, which turned out to be about as useful as a chocolate teapot. Even Intel’s director of technical marketing, Robert Hallock, had to admit the performance was “not as good as expected”, sort of like ordering a gourmet meal and getting a soggy pizza instead.
Once the undisputed king of semiconductors, Intel has had more ups and downs than a rollercoaster on a caffeine high. After getting booted from the Dow Jones stock market and suffering its largest loss in history in Q3, it seems the only thing crashing harder than their stock prices is their reputation. Not one to take things lying down, Intel decided to buddy up with Samsung and AMD, launching the eagerly awaited Ultra 200S in an attempt to turn the tide. Unfortunately, the tide just turned into a tsunami of disappointment.
Intel admits performance is not as good as expected
Response to the Ultra 200S? Let’s just say it was received with all the enthusiasm of a wet blanket. Reviewers, such as those at Geekerwan, reported that the Ultra 200S’s gaming performance can only be described as “disappointing.” They even went as far as to suggest that the 14th generation i9 14900K is still a superior choice. Can you imagine? That’s like your new car being outperformed by a rusty old bicycle!
“I can’t go into detail, but we have identified a series of multifactorial issues at the OS and BIOS level…” – Robert Hallock
It’s nice to know that Intel has turned into a detective agency, solving mysteries rather than shipping CPUs. Hallock acknowledged that the initial benchmarks didn’t meet expectations—so we’re left wondering, what exactly were those initial expectations? Perhaps a little miracle on silicon?
Can Intel solve the Ultra 200S conundrum?
While Robert Hallock is busy trying to save face, it appears Intel is working on a patch that aims to address the myriad of issues plaguing the Ultra 200S. Sounds promising, right? But let’s not pop the champagne just yet. Their competitors don’t seem to be sweating it. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has already disrupted the market like a cat walking across a piano.
Even if Intel manages to fix some of the issues and catch up with the Core i9 14900K, can they still justify the sticker price of U9 285K at $629? That’s going to be tough competition when gamers can get a better deal for a processor that’s not still working through its own existential crisis.
As potential buyers venture into this turbulent sea of CPUs, they’re likely thinking, “Do I dare to risk this shipwreck?” While waiting for Intel’s next move, many high-end gaming enthusiasts are ready to jump ship, trading in their Intel hopes for AMD dreams. For them, it might be a case of “fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, I’m buying a Ryzen instead!”
In the end, it’s clear that Intel has quite the mountain to climb if they want to ensure their place not just on the throne of CPUs, but in the hearts of gamers who are all too willing to abandon ship the moment a better option floats by. Stay tuned, folks, because this saga is far from over!
Join our Telegram channel for updates.
Intel has recently introduced its much-anticipated 15th generation CPU, the “Ultra 200S”. However, the product has faced significant backlash due to underwhelming performance levels that fell short of expectations. Robert Hallock, the director of technical marketing at Intel, openly acknowledged these shortcomings and stated that the company is planning to release a corrective software patch by the end of this month or early December, in hopes of restoring user confidence.
(Previous summary: Huida replaced Intel and became a component stock of the Dow Jones Index; Intel’s Q3 recorded its largest loss in history)
(Background supplement: Intel’s struggles are underscored by AMD’s 9800X3D showcasing a staggering efficiency lead, rendering Intel’s latest efforts seemingly irrelevant.)
Intel, once revered as the dominant force in the semiconductor industry, has witnessed an alarming decline in stock value exacerbated by disappointing financial results, extensive layoffs, and lawsuits from disgruntled consumers. The company’s troubles culminated in its removal from the prestigious Dow Jones stock market index, a significant blow to its reputation. In a bid to recover from its faltering position, Intel has reached out to tech giants Samsung and AMD to forge a strategic alliance, a collaboration that also coincided with the launch of its new 15th generation CPU, the “Ultra 200S”, earlier this October.
Despite the excitement surrounding the Ultra 200S launch, it faced harsh criticism for its lackluster performance. A recent evaluation by technology outlet Geekerwan, analyzing CPU models U5 245K, U7 265K, and U9 285K (the latter touted as the highest performer), underscored the disappointing gaming capabilities of the Ultra 200S. The performance was so subpar that Intel’s 14th generation i9 14900K was found to outperform all tested models of the Ultra 200S, leading critics to label Intel’s progress as “simply going backwards”.
Intel admits performance is not as good as expected and will launch update as early as the end of this month
In an exclusive interview with HotHardware, Robert Hallock candidly admitted that initial benchmark tests for the Core Ultra 200S did not meet Intel’s performance expectations. He stated that a range of issues at both the BIOS and OS levels were to blame for the performance decline. Although he refrained from going into specifics, he hinted at optimization challenges affecting the processor:
I can’t go into detail, but we have identified a series of multifactorial issues at the OS and BIOS level, and I must say that the performance we saw in our reviews was not what we expected and wanted.
Hallock assured that the company is actively investigating and addressing these issues, anticipating that a fix focused on enhancing gaming performance will roll out by the end of this month or in early December.
Meanwhile, multiple motherboard manufacturers have echoed these sentiments, suggesting that Intel is in the process of developing a microcode patch aimed at rectifying the Core Ultra 200S’ performance deficiencies. Initially expected to arrive shortly after the CPU’s launch, it now appears that Intel has opted to extend its timeline for the patch, prioritizing thorough resolution of issues over expedience.
Hallock addressed concerns regarding memory latency, noting that while some reviews indicated elevated latency levels, this factor was not the primary cause of diminished gaming performance. He promised that Intel would soon provide a comprehensive analysis and detailed recommendations to clarify what specifically impacts a processor’s gaming performance.
Solving the problem is still difficult to match the 9800X3D
Even if Intel successfully resolves the issues to achieve marginally improved gaming performance, the uphill battle to reach parity with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D remains daunting. Intel’s ambitions include at least matching the productivity and gaming performance levels of its own Core i9 14900K. However, the price point of the $629 U9 285K is a stark competitive disadvantage against the market-altering Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which has seen its availability dwindle and prices soar.
Potential buyers of the struggling Intel Ultra 200S series are left waiting in limbo, hoping for the company’s upcoming updates in December. However, with each passing day, the chances of luring back high-end gaming enthusiasts diminish, as many have already turned their loyalty to more reliable brands.
📍Related reports📍
Huang Renxun smiled! In response to AMD and Intel forming an x86 alliance to fight against Nvidia and Arm: What they are doing is very good
Can Intel be saved? Apollo is rumored to be willing to invest $5 billion to help Intel turn around
The U.S. government “supports Intel” to promote the localization of AI chips. Huang Renxun: TSMC is good but not the only one
Ers reported issues, the company is committed to fixing these problems with the forthcoming updates. He emphasized that they are dedicated to restoring the product’s reputation and user confidence.
As potential buyers and enthusiasts wait for these updates, the competitive landscape becomes increasingly daunting for Intel. AMD’s Ryzen 7 9800X3D continues to dominate, offering stellar performance at a competitive price point. This dynamic has left many gamers reconsidering their options, as loyalty to Intel is tested by AMD’s enticing offerings.
In a market where performance and value reign supreme, Intel’s struggle to regain the trust of high-end users is palpable. Let’s see if the much-anticipated software patch can help mend fences, or if Intel’s misfortunes will deepen as more gamers migrate to alternatives. The coming weeks are crucial for Intel’s brand image and long-term viability in a fiercely competitive industry.
