The Ombudsman rejected the petition for an 8-year term of ‘Big Tu’ that ‘Sri Suwan’ had already requested because it was not in the power to consider.
18 Aug. 2022 – It was reported that at the meeting of the Ombudsman on the evening of August 17, the meeting resolved to end the matter that Mr. Srisuwan Chanya, the secretary-general of the Thai Constitution Protection Association, asked for consideration. and has an opinion sent to the Constitutional Court to decide the problem of the 8-year term of office of Prime Minister Gen. Prayut Chan-ocha
However, the meeting considered that the petition was not a request to consider whether any provision of the law had a problem with constitutionality. According to the Organic Act on Ombudsmen 2017, Section 23 (1), the Ombudsman has the power to refer the Constitutional Court for a decision. But it is a matter of qualifications for holding political positions in the Constitution, Section 170, paragraph three, the Election Commission (EC) or members of the House of Representatives of 1 in 10 of the total number of existing members can submit a name to the Constitutional Court for a decision Therefore, it is within the authority of other independent organizations that the Organic Act on Ombudsmen Section 37 (4) prohibits the Ombudsman from taking it into consideration. Currently, the Ombudsman is in the process of making a ruling and has a written notice to the petitioner.
