From the beginning Indra Bekti hospitalized, Indy Barends was never far from his best friend. He became one of the characters who was hysterical and sad when he told the chronology that Indra Bekti was found unconscious in the bathroom. Now Indy Barends is also in the midst of chaos over the issue of donations or fundraising for Indra Bekti.
Previously unknown wife Indra Bekti, Aldila Jelita, openly asked the public to donate to pay for the Indra Bekti hospital. He did this following Indra Bekti underwent a series of operations and was observed in the ICU. At that time, according to Aldila Jelita, the cost of the Indra Bekti hospital had already touched Rp. 1 billion.
Aldila Jelita received many responses regarding this open donation. There is a figure that gives a negative response regarding what he does. However, Aldila Jelita has emphasized that her decision to raise funds is a method that she takes as a wife because it is considered the best way.
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO RESUME CONTENT
Now the donation has been closed. But the chaos is still felt. That’s where the name Indy Barends reappeared. There is an allegation that Indy Barends is among those who disagree with Aldila Jelina’s decision to open donations for Indra Bekti.
It started with an upload of criticism of Indy Barends on social media. He shared a big question mark emoticon via Instagram Stories which made netizens connect him with the Indra Bekti donation problem.
Not wanting these unpleasant rumors to grow, Indy Barends immediately clarified. He emphasized that the matter of fundraising should not be collected into personal accounts. He emphasized that not only for Aldila Jelita but for everyone.
“Never, I have never issued a statement that I don’t agree with Dila,” said Indy Barends when met at Studio Trans 7, Tendean, South Jakarta, Friday (6/1/2023).
“Because fundraising is not possible or there is a law, there are certain articles which state that it is recommended that donations are not made to personal accounts. That’s just a delivery, not a prohibition,” he concluded.
(always)