In the “gathering” case, three Bangladeshis were sentenced to life imprisonment, and 54 others were imprisoned and deported.

2024-07-22 20:13:37

The Federal Court of Appeal in Abu Dhabi ruled the day before yesterday that it convicted 57 Bangladeshi defendants in a case dubbed the “gathering case” by the media. The court sentenced three defendants to life imprisonment for calling and inciting them to demonstrate with the purpose of Under pressure, the government also sentenced 53 other defendants to 10 years in prison and 11 years in prison for illegally entering the country and participating in the rally.

The court also ruled that all offenders will be deported from the state at the end of their sentences and have their seized devices confiscated.

The prosecutor, consultant Dr. Hamad Shamsi, previously announced the launch of an investigation into all incidents of rallies and riots in several emirates of the country, and transferred the defendants to emergency trials after supervision of the investigations. The panel was launched to confirm…Those charged with gathering in a public place, with intent to riot, disrupting public safety, sedition and incitement We have a clear understanding of these rallies and marches after a number of the defendants pleaded guilty and admitted committing the alleged offences. An investigation was conducted, and video and audio footage of the acts was filmed and posted on the Internet.

During the trial, which was reported in the media, the prosecution sought the maximum penalty for the defendants.

The court heard the testimony of prosecution witnesses, which confirmed that the defendants gathered in large numbers and organized demonstrations in many streets in the country to protest against the decisions issued by the Bangladeshi government, causing riots, disrupting public safety, and obstructing and disrupting the implementation of the Bangladeshi government. , personal and traffic interests, and endangering public and private property, the police reminded the crowd to disperse and leave, but they ignored this warning.

The defense lawyer appointed by the court to defend the defendants argued that there was no criminal intent in the gathering and there was insufficient evidence for the accusations, requiring the defendants to be acquitted. However, the court ruled that since there was sufficient evidence that they committed these crimes, they were conviction.

1721681016
#gathering #case #Bangladeshis #sentenced #life #imprisonment #imprisoned #deported

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.