The Anti-Terrorism Court of Lahore gave a reserved verdict on the bail applications of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder chairman Imran Khan in 8 cases on May 9.
The anti-terrorism court in Lahore rejected the bails of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder in the Jinnah House attack and May 9 eight cases. Judge Manzar Ali Gul gave a reserved verdict on the bails.
Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Manzar Ali Gul heard former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s bail pleas in 8 cases on May 9. Founding Chairman PTI’s lawyer Barrister Salman Safdar appeared in the court.
Founder PTI had filed bails in the Jinnah House attack, Shadman police station arson cases and the burning of police vehicles at Rahat Bakery Chowk and Zaman Park. Apart from this, founder PTI also filed bails in the Askari Tower attack and three other May 9 cases, which were rejected by the court.
Report of the hearing
Barrister Salman Safdar while arguing in the court said that the wrong reaction to the opinion of PTI founder came from the people. I have represented founder PTI in more than 240 cases. All kinds of cases were registered against one accused. There is no section under which a case has not been registered. Cypher’s case went to the Supreme Court, all others got relief from subordinate courts.
The lawyer said that in 30 cases decisions have been made against the government. I am placing before you about 25 decisions. The plaintiffs in each case are policemen. The government has thrown googly, leg break, off break second third. Sometimes they say that the conspiracy took place in this way, then they say that it did not take place in this way. Bushra Bibi was included in 12 cases that she was also involved in the conspiracy. It is easy to accuse and difficult to prove.
Barrister Salman Safdar said that I am not asking you for discharge or dismissal of the case. You cannot even provide these facilities. The accused has been in jail for a long time, I am asking the court for bail.
The lawyer argued that Pervez Musharraf’s medical records were presented, he had to leave the world to prove them true. After that everyone was convinced that all the medicals were correct. Judges have relayed PTI founder’s detention in NAB custody from May 9 to 12.
Later, Special Prosecutor Rao Abdul Jabbar said in his arguments that all the cases are of rebellion against the government and attack on sensitive installations. The judgments presented are not related to these cases. According to British law, the King is not impeachable. The accused is not a king. At the behest of the accused, 200 installations were attacked. It was said on social media that today is the day of real jihad. Indian TV channels also continued to run the same news.
The prosecutor added in the arguments that the general public is prohibited from visiting certain places in Kent. Everyone has a modern device that communicates location and messages. How PC Hotel, Awari Hotel or milk shop in Anarkali was not attacked. Military installations were attacked. The statue of Colonel Sher Khan Shaheed, who sacrificed his life for the safety of the country, was kicked. These wars and attacks continue even today. The ranger and the policeman were martyred, while the accused says that I am in jail.
While giving arguments in the court on behalf of the prosecution, it was further said that the accused was not in jail on May 7 when the conspiracy took place, the application of the accused should be dismissed.
Later, the court reserved its judgment after completing the arguments on the bail pleas of the prosecution and the accused’s counsel.
#Major #verdict #Imran #Khans #bail #pleas #cases #Pakistan
What are the potential consequences of Imran Khan remaining in detention for Mr. Khan and for Pakistani politics?
## Imran Khan Denied Bail in Eight Cases: Interview with Legal Analyst
**Interviewer:** Joining us today is legal analyst *[Guest Name]*, who specializes in Pakistani law. Imran Khan, former Prime Minister, has had his bail applications rejected in eight cases related to the May 9th protests. What can you tell us about this development?
**Guest:** This is a significant setback for Mr. Khan. The Anti-Terrorism Court in Lahore rejected his bail pleas in connection with incidents like the Jinnah House attack, arson at a police station, and the burning of police vehicles. This follows his earlier arrest on corruption charges which, as you mentioned, sparked violence, and was later deemed illegal by a separate court.
**Interviewer:** Can you elaborate on the arguments made by Mr. Khan’s legal team during the hearing?
**Guest:** Barrister Salman Safdar, Mr. Khan’s lawyer, presented a strong case, highlighting what he saw as a pattern of politically motivated prosecutions against his client. He argued that the reaction to Mr. Khan’s political views from some individuals should not be used to justify these charges. Mr
Safdar also pointed out the numerous cases filed against Mr. Khan, suggesting an overzealous effort to target him.
**Interviewer:** What are the implications of this decision for Mr. Khan?
**Guest:** This decision means Mr. Khan will remain in detention for the time being. It also raises concerns about the politicization of the justice system and the potential for selective prosecution. This will undoubtedly fuel further debate and tensions within Pakistan.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for providing your insights on this developing situation. We will continue to monitor the case closely.
**Please remember**: This is a fictional interview based on the provided information. It does not necessarily reflect the views of any specific legal expert or organization.
