After the Supreme Court‘s decision, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan has sought acquittal in NAB cases.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court rejected Imran Khan’s request to declare the NAB amendments null and void, while accepting the intra-court appeals of the federal and provincial governments and restoring the NAB amendments.
In the detailed judgment of the Supreme Court, it was said that the founder PTI could not satisfy the court regarding the annulment of the NAB amendments.
League leaders blame PTI, ‘They don’t have the funds for the rally and they don’t have the staff’
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
After the decision of the Supreme Court, Chairman PTI Barrister Gohar Ali said that the founder PTI has got two benefits from the court decision in the NAB amendments, one is that the second Tosha Khana case cannot go on against Imran Khan and the other is that After the court decision, the 190 million pound case also went out of the accountability court’s jurisdiction.
After which the 190 million pound case was heard against PTI founder Imran Khan in Adiala Jail today, PTI founder and Bashira Bibi appeared in the accountability court.
Meanwhile, the lawyers of founder PTI submitted a copy of the decision of the NAB amendment case in the accountability court.
Stopped from taking the materials for the meeting, there is no problem with the new place of the meeting place, Umar Ayub
Imran Khan’s lawyer said that after the NAB amendment decision, the case of 190 million pounds is not created, all the decisions of the cabinet are protected in the NAB amendments.
He further said that the question is whether the accountability court has jurisdiction in this case after the NAB amendments.
The NAB prosecutor said that if the court has jurisdiction in the case, then the plea of acquittal can be heard.
On which PTI’s lawyer said that we have not challenged the jurisdiction of the court, it is the discretion of the court to decide the jurisdiction of the court.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
The court issued notices to the parties on the acquittal plea of PTI founder.
A political party is attacking Pakistan, I don’t know when we will mature politically, Ishaq Dar
The court adjourned the hearing of the case till September 10.
#Imran #Khan #seeks #acquittal #NAB #cases #Supreme #Court #verdict #Pakistan
2024-09-11 04:32:07
What are the implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision on Imran Khan’s legal battles with NAB?
Table of Contents
Imran Khan Seeks Acquittal in NAB Cases After Supreme Court’s Decision
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan has sought acquittal in National Accountability Bureau (NAB) cases following the Supreme Court’s decision to restore NAB amendments [[3]]. The development comes after the Supreme Court rejected Imran Khan’s request to declare the NAB amendments null and void, accepting the intra-court appeals of the federal and provincial governments [[1]][[3]].
In the detailed judgment, the Supreme Court stated that Imran Khan could not satisfy the court regarding the annulment of the NAB amendments. This decision has significant implications for Imran Khan, who is facing several cases, including the £190 million reference and the Toshakhana case [[2]][[3]].
After the Supreme Court’s decision, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali said that Imran Khan has gained two benefits. Firstly, the second Toshakhana case cannot proceed against him, and secondly, the £190 million pound case is no longer under the jurisdiction of the accountability court [[1]][[3]].
Subsequently, Imran Khan’s lawyer submitted a copy of the NAB amendment case decision in the accountability court, arguing that the case of £190 million pounds is not created, and all cabinet decisions are protected in the NAB amendments. The lawyer further questioned whether the accountability court has jurisdiction in this case after the NAB amendments [[3]].
The NAB prosecutor responded, stating that if the court has jurisdiction, then the plea of acquittal can be heard. Imran Khan’s lawyer countered, saying that they have not challenged the jurisdiction of the court, and it is up to the court to decide on its jurisdiction [[3]].
In a related development, a court barred NAB from handling the Toshakhana case against Imran Khan, stating that he and his wife, Bushra Bibi, were involved in the unauthorized sale of valuable items, including brand watches and diamond jewelry [[2]].
Imran Khan’s move to seek acquittal in NAB cases is a significant development in the ongoing legal battle between him and the government. The outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications for Imran Khan’s political future and the legal landscape in Pakistan.
References:
What are the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision on Imran Khan’s request for acquittal in the NAB cases?
Imran Khan Seeks Acquittal in NAB Cases After Supreme Court’s Decision
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan has sought acquittal in National Accountability Bureau (NAB) cases following the Supreme Court’s decision to restore NAB amendments [[3]]. The development comes after the Supreme Court rejected Imran Khan’s request to declare the NAB amendments null and void, accepting the intra-court appeals of the federal and provincial governments [[1]][[3]].
In the detailed judgment, the Supreme Court stated that Imran Khan could not satisfy the court regarding the annulment of the NAB amendments. This decision has significant implications for Imran Khan, who is facing several cases, including the £190 million reference and the Toshakhana case [[2]][[3]].
After the Supreme Court’s decision, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali said that Imran Khan has gained two benefits. Firstly, the second Toshakhana case cannot proceed