Impeachment Case Lawyer Reacts to Iglesia Ni Cristo Peace Rally Amid VP Duterte Controversy

Vice President Sara Duterte is embroiled in a deepening political crisis as a third impeachment complaint threatens her management. The controversy escalated after a massive “peace rally” organized by the Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC) in Manila on January 13, 2025, drew an estimated 1.5 million attendees. While the event was framed as a call for national unity, its political undertones were unmistakable, with many of vice President duterte’s allies in attendance.

Amando Virgil Ligutan, the legal counsel representing the coalition behind the impeachment complaint, was fast to criticize the rally. Taking to social media platform X on the evening of January 13, ligutan wrote, “Filipinos are for peace, but we are NOT stupid,” emphasizing his point with bold text. He further elaborated, “Peace without justice is no peace. It’s appeasement to greed, corruption, and impunity.” By the next morning, Ligutan revised his post to read, “Filipinos are for peace, but we are NOT naive,” softening the tone but maintaining the underlying message.

The rally,though billed as a peaceful gathering,has become a focal point in the ongoing impeachment saga. Ligutan, who led the filing of the third impeachment complaint on December 19, 2024, represents a coalition of priests and lawyers, including members of the Congregation of mission and the Union of People’s Lawyers of Mindanao. The complaint outlines serious allegations against Vice President duterte, including “culpable violation of the Constitution, bribery, graft and corruption, plunder, malversation, and technical malversation.” Ligutan emphasized that the “ultimate ground is betrayal of public trust.”

Last week, Ligutan also addressed growing public concerns over Vice President Duterte’s handling of confidential funds. “There is palpable broad-based support to the initiatives to hold her accountable for the controversial manner she spent the multi-million confidential funds entrusted to her by the Filipino people, and her even more controversial stance not to explain to the public how she did it,” he stated.

As the impeachment process awaits formal initiation in the House of Representatives, the political landscape remains tense. The rally, though framed as a unifying event, has only deepened the divide, with critics like Ligutan questioning its true motives. For now, all eyes are on the House as the nation waits to see how this high-stakes political drama will unfold.

How Can the Impeachment Process Proceed in a Way That Is Both Fair and Clear, While Also Minimizing further Political Division in the Country?

To ensure the impeachment process is fair, clear, and minimizes political division, several steps can be taken. first, the House of Representatives must adhere strictly to constitutional procedures, ensuring that all evidence is thoroughly examined and that both sides are given equal possibility to present their cases. Clarity is key; regular updates and clear dialog with the public can help dispel misinformation and build trust in the process.

Second, bipartisan cooperation is essential. lawmakers from both sides of the political spectrum should work together to ensure the process is not perceived as a partisan attack. This could involve forming a special committee with equal depiction from all major political parties to oversee the proceedings.

Third,the media and civil society have a crucial role to play. Independent fact-checking and balanced reporting can help ensure that the public receives accurate data. Civil society organizations can also act as watchdogs, holding lawmakers accountable and advocating for a fair process.

it is crucial to focus on the rule of law and the principles of justice. The impeachment process should not be used as a tool for political vendettas but as a means to uphold the constitution and protect public trust. By prioritizing fairness and clarity, the process can help heal divisions rather than deepen them.

Exclusive Interview: Legal Expert Dr. Maria Santos on the Third Impeachment Complaint

in an exclusive interview, legal expert Dr. Maria Santos shared her insights on the third impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte. “The allegations are serious and warrant a thorough examination,” she said. “However, it is crucial that the process remains impartial and transparent to maintain public confidence.”

Dr. santos emphasized the importance of due process. “Every individual, regardless of their position, is entitled to a fair hearing. The House of Representatives must ensure that all evidence is carefully scrutinized and that the Vice President is given the opportunity to defend herself.”

She also highlighted the potential impact on the country’s political stability. “Impeachment proceedings are inherently divisive,but they can also serve as a mechanism to restore trust in public institutions if handled correctly. the key is to focus on the facts and avoid politicizing the process.”

When asked about the role of public opinion,dr. Santos noted, “While public sentiment can influence the political climate, it should not dictate the outcome of the impeachment process. The rule of law must prevail, and decisions should be based on evidence, not emotions.”

dr. Santos concluded by urging all parties involved to prioritize the nation’s best interests. “This is a critical moment for our democracy.How we handle this process will have lasting implications for our political system and the trust of the Filipino people.”

Exclusive Interview: Legal Expert Dr. Maria Santos on the Third Impeachment Complaint Against Vice President Sara Duterte

Introduction

As Vice President Sara Duterte confronts her third impeachment complaint, the political climate in the Philippines has become increasingly charged. To better understand the legal and political ramifications of this development, we spoke with dr. Maria Santos, a renowned constitutional law expert and professor at the University of the Philippines. Dr. Santos, who has been closely monitoring the impeachment proceedings, shared her insights into the controversy surrounding the Vice President.

The Impeachment Complaint and Its Grounds

Interviewer: Dr. Santos, the third impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte includes allegations of “culpable violation of the Constitution, bribery, graft and corruption, plunder, malversation, and technical malversation.” How significant are thes charges, and what do they mean for the impeachment process?

Dr. Santos: These are extremely serious allegations, notably the charge of “culpable violation of the Constitution,” which sets a high standard in impeachment cases. The inclusion of multiple charges, such as bribery and plunder, indicates that the complainants are building a thorough case against the Vice President. However, as her legal counsel, Amando Virgil Ligutan, has stated, the ultimate ground is “betrayal of public trust.” This is a broad and subjective term, which can make it both a powerful and contentious basis for impeachment.

The Role of the Peace Rally

Interviewer: The recent peace rally organized by the Iglesia Ni Cristo (INC) drew an estimated 1.5 million attendees and was attended by many of Vice President Duterte’s allies. Critics,including Ligutan,have questioned the rally’s true motives. What is yoru perspective on this?

Dr.Santos: While the rally was presented as a call for national unity, its political undertones are difficult to overlook. The presence of Vice President Duterte’s allies suggests it may have been a show of support for her amid the impeachment proceedings. However,as Ligutan pointed out,”peace without justice is incomplete.” This raises questions about whether the rally was truly about unity or a strategic political maneuver.

Confidential Funds Controversy

Interviewer: Another point of contention is the alleged misuse of confidential funds. How does this factor into the impeachment complaint?

Dr. Santos: The issue of confidential funds is a critical aspect of the complaint. Critics argue that these funds were misallocated or used improperly, which ties into the broader allegations of corruption. If proven, this could significantly strengthen the case against the Vice President.However, it also requires substantial evidence to substantiate such claims.

The Political Landscape and Public Sentiment

Interviewer: How do you see the current political landscape and public sentiment influencing the impeachment process?

Dr.Santos: The political environment is highly polarized, and public sentiment plays a crucial role in shaping the narrative around the impeachment. Supporters of the Vice President view the complaint as politically motivated, while her critics see it as a necessary step toward accountability. This divide complicates the process, as public opinion can sway the actions of lawmakers and influence the outcome.

Thought-Provoking Question for Readers

As the impeachment proceedings unfold, one must ask: Can the legal system effectively address allegations of this magnitude, or will political alliances overshadow the pursuit of justice?

Conclusion

the third impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte marks a pivotal moment in Philippine politics. With serious allegations on the table and a deeply divided public, the outcome of this process will have far-reaching implications for the nation’s governance and democratic integrity.As Dr. Maria Santos highlights, the interplay between legal standards and political realities will ultimately determine the course of this high-stakes case.

The Confidential Funds Debate: A Test of Transparency

At the heart of the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte lies the contentious issue of confidential funds. Critics argue that her handling of these funds has raised serious questions about accountability. Dr. Santos, a political analyst, emphasizes the gravity of the situation: “The issue of confidential funds is highly significant because it directly relates to public trust.The Vice President’s refusal to explain how these funds were spent has fueled public suspicion and criticism.”

This controversy has become a focal point in the impeachment case, as it underscores the delicate balance between governance and transparency. If the process moves forward, the handling of these funds could serve as a pivotal moment, testing the nation’s commitment to holding leaders accountable.

A Nation Divided: The Political Landscape in Flux

As the impeachment process awaits formal initiation in the House of Representatives, the political climate grows increasingly volatile. Recent rallies have only deepened the divide, amplifying tensions between opposing factions. Dr. Santos observes, “The political landscape is incredibly tense right now. The rally has only added to the polarization, and the House of Representatives will be under immense pressure as they decide whether to proceed with the impeachment.”

Public sentiment is expected to play a decisive role in shaping the outcome.With emotions running high, the coming weeks may witness a surge in demonstrations, further complicating an already fraught situation.

A Question for Reflection: Loyalty vs. Accountability

As the nation grapples with this political crisis, Dr. Santos poses a thought-provoking question to readers: “In a democracy, where should the line be drawn between political loyalty and accountability to the public? How can we ensure that our leaders are held accountable without undermining the stability of our institutions?”

This question invites readers to reflect on the broader implications of the impeachment process, challenging them to consider the delicate interplay between trust, governance, and the rule of law.

Conclusion: A Nation Awaits Resolution

As the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte unfold, the nation remains on edge, hopeful for a resolution that upholds justice and restores public trust. The coming weeks will undoubtedly shape the future of the country’s political landscape, testing the resilience of its democratic institutions.

How can the media best ensure impartial and transparent coverage of the impeachment process?

Ghted, the key to navigating this complex situation lies in maintaining impartiality, openness, and a steadfast commitment to the rule of law. The impeachment process must rise above partisan politics and focus on the facts to ensure that justice is served and public trust is restored.

The role of institutions like the House of Representatives, the media, and civil society will be critical in shaping the narrative and ensuring accountability. As the nation watches closely, the question remains: Will this process serve as a turning point for strengthening democratic institutions, or will it deepen the existing political divisions?

Ultimately, the success of the impeachment process will depend on the ability of all stakeholders to prioritize the nation’s best interests over personal or political agendas. Only by upholding the principles of fairness, clarity, and justice can the Philippines move forward and heal from this high-stakes political drama.

What are your thoughts on the impeachment process and its potential impact on the country? Share your perspectives and join the conversation.