ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian way if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolph Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
**Interview with Political Analyst Juanita Mejía on Trump’s Recent Defense**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Juanita. We’ve just seen a very charged exchange between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris regarding accusations of fascism and totalitarianism. What’s your take on Trump’s response of “I am not a Nazi” and his insistence that he is the opposite?
**Juanita Mejía:** Thank you for having me. Trump’s statement is a classic move in his playbook; he often counters accusations with strong denials. By saying he is “not a Nazi,” he’s attempting to frame the narrative in a way that minimizes the seriousness of the allegations. This is particularly relevant as he runs for president again.
**Interviewer:** Harris has labeled him as a danger and expressed concern over his potential to govern with authoritarian tendencies if elected. How do you think these comments resonate with voters?
**Juanita Mejía:** Harris’s remarks highlight concerns about Trump’s instability and desire for unchecked power. Voters who prioritize democratic norms and institutions may find her warnings convincing, especially as we analyze how the 2016 and 2020 elections diverged from the current political climate. With escalating fears of electoral implications, this could galvanize some constituents to mobilize against him.
**Interviewer:** Trump’s campaign seems to be built on personal attacks. Do you expect this strategy to be effective in the current political landscape?
**Juanita Mejía:** History shows that Trump’s base responds positively to his combative style. However, as we approach an election with high stakes, this approach may backfire when undecided voters or those disillusioned by polarization seek more substantive dialog rather than name-calling.
**Interviewer:** In light of Kamala Harris’s assertion that “this time, there will be no one there to stop it,” what implications do you foresee for the electoral process moving forward?
**Juanita Mejía:** Harris’s comments seem to suggest a sense of urgency and alarm. If Trump continues on a path of igniting fear and division, we could witness significant voter turnout among those who perceive this election as a turning point for democracy. The battleground states will play a pivotal role, and how candidates frame their campaigns in these areas will greatly influence the outcome.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Juanita, for your insights. It’ll be interesting to see how this narrative unfolds in the days leading up to the elections.
**Juanita Mejía:** Absolutely, it’s a critical time in American politics, and the discourse will likely intensify as we get closer to Election Day. Thanks for having me.