ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian way if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolph Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
**How might Trump’s denial of the accusations of admiration for Hitler influence his support among voters leading up to the election?**
**Interview with Political Analyst on Trump’s Response to Kamala Harris**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. We’re discussing recent comments made by former President Donald Trump in response to Vice President Kamala Harris’s accusations that he admires Hitler. Trump stated, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” What do you make of his response?
**Analyst:** Thank you for having me. Trump’s statement is a direct denial of the accusations of fascism and authoritarianism that have been levied against him, especially in the context of the upcoming elections. His use of strong language to assert that he is “the opposite of a Nazi” seems aimed at disassociating himself from any claims that could undermine his campaign.
**Interviewer:** Harris has described Trump as a danger to democracy and claimed he’s “even more unstable and more unhinged.” How do you think these characterizations are impacting the electoral landscape?
**Analyst:** The term “danger” carries significant weight and is likely meant to rally her base and undecided voters. The backdrop of these elections is indeed more precarious, given the polarization we’ve seen. Harris pointing out that there’s “a lot at stake” can resonate with voters who are concerned about the implications of Trump winning another term. It keeps the narrative focused on the potential risks of his leadership.
**Interviewer:** Trump also mentioned that there would be “no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Court.” What do you believe is the significance of this statement?
**Analyst:** This statement suggests an underlying concern about judicial checks and balances. By indicating that even the Supreme Court might not intervene if he acts beyond certain limits emphasizes a perceived erosion of legal safeguards. It can galvanize his supporters who feel that the judicial system has become politicized. However, it also raises alarms among critics who worry about the implications of an unchecked presidency.
**Interviewer:** With the elections just around the corner, how critical do you think these exchanges will be for both campaigns?
**Analyst:** These exchanges are vital, as they frame the broader narratives of both campaigns. For Trump, his defense against accusations of fascism is essential for maintaining his appeal among his base. For Harris and the Democrats, framing Trump as a threat is a strategic move to unify their supporters and sway moderates and undecided voters. Ultimately, the effectiveness of these messages will be tested at the ballot box.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for sharing your insights on this heated political exchange. It will be interesting to see how these narratives unfold in the final days of the campaign.
**Analyst:** Absolutely, and thank you for having me. It’s a critical time, and as always, voter sentiment will play a pivotal role in determining the outcome.