ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian way if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolph Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
– What are the implications of Trump’s rebuttal to Kamala Harris’s accusations in the context of the upcoming elections?
**Interviewer:** Welcome! Today, we have a special guest joining us to discuss recent remarks made by former President Donald Trump and ongoing political tensions leading up to the upcoming elections. Thank you for being here.
**Guest:** Thank you for having me!
**Interviewer:** Let’s start with Trump’s response to Kamala Harris after she labeled him as a fascist and suggested he admired Hitler’s generals. He claimed, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” What are your thoughts on that statement?
**Guest:** Trump’s assertion is certainly a strong rebuttal, and it reflects his ongoing strategy of denying any connections to extremist ideologies. However, such inflammatory remarks from political opponents have become a hallmark of today’s political climate. Whether or not he is taken seriously can depend on the audience.
**Interviewer:** Kamala Harris has described Trump as a “danger” and stated that the stakes in this election are incredibly high. What do you think she means by that?
**Guest:** Harris is highlighting the gravity of the current political landscape. Her comments suggest that Trump’s potential return to power could lead to a significant shift in governance, perceived as authoritarian. This framing aims to mobilize voters to view the election not as just another cycle but as a pivotal moment for democracy.
**Interviewer:** Trump also mentioned that he is “more unstable and more unhinged” and questioned whether there would be anyone to stop him should he regain power. How do you interpret that?
**Guest:** Trump’s critics argue that he displays erratic behavior, which poses risks if he were to return to office. The mention of a lack of checks, even from the Supreme Court, points to concerns about possible authoritarian overreach. It raises fundamental questions about accountability and the balance of power within the U.S. government.
**Interviewer:** With so much division and intense rhetoric, how do you think voters are responding as we approach Election Day?
**Guest:** Voters are often polarized, with some rallying behind Trump as a champion against what they perceive as a threatening establishment. Others, like those backing Harris, are motivated by the fear of losing democratic norms. The current environment is charged, and turnout could be influenced by these strong emotional appeals.
**Interviewer:** Do you think that personal attacks will overshadow policy discussions in this election cycle?
**Guest:** Unfortunately, it seems that personal attacks have become the norm in recent elections. While policy is still essential, the emotional tactics often capture more media attention and voter engagement. It will be interesting to see if candidates can pivot back to policy discussions as the election draws closer.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for sharing these insights. It’s clear that the upcoming elections hold significant implications for the future of the United States.
**Guest:** Absolutely, and thank you for having me. It’s crucial for voters to stay informed and engaged!
**Interviewer:** That’s a great reminder. We appreciate your time today!
