ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
What are the potential implications of Trump’s denial of being associated with Nazism on his voter base and election strategy?
**Interview with Political Analyst on Trump and Harris’s Recent Exchanges**
**Interviewer:** Today, we have political analyst Dr. Sarah Jenkins joining us to discuss the heated exchange between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the upcoming elections. Thank you for being here, Dr. Jenkins.
**Dr. Jenkins:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** Recently, Trump asserted, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” in response to accusations from Kamala Harris that he admires Hitler. How do you interpret this statement?
**Dr. Jenkins:** Trump’s statement is a clear defense mechanism. It’s not uncommon for political figures to distance themselves from extreme ideologies, especially in an election cycle. By vehemently denying any association with Nazism, he aims to shore up his base and appeal to undecided voters who may be concerned about authoritarianism.
**Interviewer:** Kamala Harris has labeled Trump as a danger and has warned that he is ”even more unstable and more unhinged.” How does this rhetoric fit into the broader context of the current political landscape?
**Dr. Jenkins:** Harris’s comments reflect a growing concern among Democrats regarding Trump’s potential return to power. By framing him as unstable and a threat, she’s attempting to galvanize support and emphasize the stakes of the upcoming election. This kind of rhetoric isn’t new but has intensified given the polarized climate we’re witnessing today.
**Interviewer:** Trump also mentioned that “there will be no one there to stop it,” referring to potential Supreme Court decisions protecting him. What implications does this have for the elections and the legal landscape?
**Dr. Jenkins:** This statement suggests Trump is feeling empowered and believes he can operate without checks on his power, which is alarming for many voters. If he wins, this mentality raises questions about judicial independence and the separation of powers. The coming elections are critical because they may determine the trajectory of these issues for years to come.
**Interviewer:** In light of these events, how do you think voters will respond to the escalating personal attacks?
**Dr. Jenkins:** Voter reactions can be quite nuanced. While personal attacks can energize a candidate’s base, they can also alienate moderates. Ultimately, it may come down to how effectively each candidate can frame these exchanges in terms of policy and vision for the future, rather than just personal character.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Jenkins, for your insights on this significant topic as we approach a pivotal election.
**Dr. Jenkins:** My pleasure! It’s going to be an interesting few days as we head closer to election day.