ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
How might Harris’s portrayal of Trump as unstable influence voter perceptions and engagement in the upcoming elections?
**Interview with Political Analyst on Recent Trump and Harris Remarks**
**Interviewer:** Welcome, everyone. Today we have a political analyst, Dr. Sarah Thompson, with us to discuss the recent statements from former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the fast-approaching elections. Dr. Thompson, thank you for joining us.
**Dr. Thompson:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** Let’s start with Trump’s assertive denial of being a Nazi. He recently stated, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” How should we interpret this comment in the context of the election atmosphere?
**Dr. Thompson:** Trump’s denial reflects his attempt to distance himself from extreme labels that could alienate voters. He is trying to reframe the narrative to protect his base while simultaneously appealing to undecided voters who may be concerned about extremes in politics. However, such strong assertions can also polarize opinions even further.
**Interviewer:** Vice President Harris claimed that Trump is “even more unstable and more unhinged” and cautioned that he “wants power without control.” What do you think is her strategy behind these remarks?
**Dr. Thompson:** Harris is leveraging this moment to depict Trump as a significant threat to American democracy. By emphasizing instability, she aims to mobilize voters who fear authoritarianism and highlight the stakes of the upcoming elections. It’s a classic strategy to position her campaign in stark contrast to what she frames as a dangerous rival.
**Interviewer:** There’s also a notable shift this election compared to 2016 and 2020, with both sides employing aggressive personal attacks. Why do you think we are seeing this trend?
**Dr. Thompson:** The stakes feel particularly high for many voters, which leads to heightened emotions and rhetoric. Both parties are aware that this election could redefine the political landscape, particularly with major issues like abortion rights and democracy itself on the ballot. Consequently, personal attacks have escalated as a means to discredit opponents and energize their respective bases.
**Interviewer:** What impact do you think these exchanges will have on undecided voters?
**Dr. Thompson:** For undecided voters, personal attacks may create fatigue and resentment towards both candidates. This could lead to apathy or motivate voters to seek out third-party candidates. However, it’s also possible that clear distinctions in values and visions presented through these attacks could galvanize some to make a decision about who they believe poses a greater threat.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for your insights. As we watch these developments unfold, it will be crucial to see how they affect voter turnout and engagement in the upcoming election.
**Dr. Thompson:** Absolutely. These dynamics will definitely play a critical role in shaping the election outcomes.
**Interviewer:** Thanks again for joining us, and we look forward to your analysis in the future.