ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
What are the implications of Trump’s statements on his reelection strategy as observed by political analysts?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Linda Hartman on Donald Trump’s Recent Statements**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Hartman. We’ve seen some intense statements from Donald Trump in response to Kamala Harris’s accusations of him admiring authoritarian figures like Hitler. What are your thoughts on his claim, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi”?
**Dr. Hartman:** Thank you for having me. Trump’s denial and attempt to distance himself from such extreme labels is not surprising, but it does highlight his ongoing strategy of confronting critics head-on. His rhetoric suggests a careful positioning as he seeks to appeal to a wide range of Republican voters while rejecting the label of fascism, which many pundits have started using in reference to his political style.
**Interviewer:** Kamala Harris stated that Trump is “even more unstable and more unhinged” and wants “power without control.” How significant do you think these characterizations are in the context of this election cycle?
**Dr. Hartman:** Those descriptors are quite powerful and reflect a broader concern among Democratic candidates about Trump’s behaviour, especially given his past presidency. Harris’s comments attempt to frame the forthcoming election as not just a political contest, but a potential threat to democratic norms. This kind of language is designed to mobilize voters who are frightened by the prospect of another Trump presidency and underscore the stakes involved.
**Interviewer:** Trump also remarked that there’s “no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Court,” referencing a perceived lack of checks on his power. Do you think this is a strategic move to rally his base by utilizing fear tactics?
**Dr. Hartman:** Absolutely. By suggesting that he would operate without any checks, Trump is capitalizing on a theme of libertarianism and anti-establishment sentiment that resonates with his supporters. It positions him as a guardian against what he frames as an overreaching government, a narrative that can inspire a strong, devoted base. However, it also raises alarm bells among more moderate and undecided voters who may fear the implications of such unchecked power.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, given the context of rising tensions and personal attacks in this election cycle, how do you see the dynamics evolving as we approach election day?
**Dr. Hartman:** We’re certainly heading into an era of heightened emotions and aggressive campaigning. As both sides trade barbs, it’s critical for voters to discern between rhetoric and policy. The engagement and turnout of younger voters and those concerned about the implications of Trump’s potential return to power will be crucial. The stakes, as both parties are framing them, could lead to one of the most highly polarized elections we’ve seen in modern history.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Hartman, for your insights. It will be interesting to see how this all unfolds in the coming days.
**Dr. Hartman:** Thank you for having me. I look forward to following the developments.
—
This interview provides an analysis of the political dynamics highlighted in the situation regarding Trump and Harris while maintaining an impartial stance.
