ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
– How do Trump’s recent comments about being labeled a Nazi reflect his strategy to appeal to different voter demographics in the upcoming election?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Jane Smith on Trump’s Recent Comments and the Upcoming Elections**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Smith. We have seen former President Donald Trump making headlines recently for his response to claims made by Vice President Kamala Harris regarding his political ideology. What are your thoughts on Trump’s declaration, “I am not a Nazi,” and the implications of this statement?
**Dr. Smith:** Thank you for having me. Trump’s denial of being a Nazi is part of a broader strategy he employs to distance himself from extreme labels during a critical election period. It’s important to understand that in his dialog, he is trying to maintain his base while appealing to undecided voters who may be wary of authoritarianism. His response highlights his need to present himself as a more stable candidate compared to Harris’s assertions.
**Interviewer:** Kamala Harris insists that Trump poses a danger and describes him as “unstable.” How do you see this portrayal affecting public perception ahead of the election?
**Dr. Smith:** Harris’s framing of Trump as a danger taps into the fears many voters have about authoritarianism and the past presidency. However, how effective this message will be largely depends on voter sentiment and what they prioritize in this election. With the stakes high—particularly in swing states—there is a real risk that both sides could continue to escalate their rhetoric, potentially alienating moderate voters.
**Interviewer:** Trump also mentioned during an event that “there will be no one there to stop it,” referencing past Supreme Court rulings. What does this mean for the future of checks and balances in the U.S. if he is re-elected?
**Dr. Smith:** That statement underscores his belief that he can leverage his past presidency in a way that could undermine democratic norms. If Trump were to return to the presidency, it raises concerns about a lack of accountability. His rhetoric suggests a willingness to operate without the traditional checks that have historically been in place to limit presidential power. This is especially troubling considering the current political climate wherein norms are increasingly challenged.
**Interviewer:** with the election just days away, what can we expect in terms of campaign strategies from both sides as they rally their supporters?
**Dr. Smith:** We are likely to see intensified personal attacks and a focus on mobilizing their respective bases. Each campaign will want to solidify their support while also trying to sway independents. This could mean heavier reliance on advertising, large rallies, and increased social media engagement. Ultimately, how well both candidates can convey their vision for the future and connect with voters who are concerned about issues such as stability, security, and governance will be critical.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Smith, for your insights on this pivotal moment in U.S. politics.
**Dr. Smith:** It was my pleasure. Thank you for having me.
