ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
**What are the potential implications of Trump’s statements on his political support as we approach the elections?**
**Interview with Political Analyst Jane Smith on Trump’s Recent Statements and Election Context**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Jane. Let’s dive right into it. Former President Donald Trump recently stated, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” in response to Kamala Harris’s comments about his admiration of Hitler. What do you make of his defence?
**Jane Smith:** Thanks for having me. Trump’s statement is a classic example of his combative rhetoric, especially during this election cycle. By firmly rejecting the label of “Nazi,” he aims to distance himself from any authoritarian comparisons, which he believes alienate his base. His insistence on being the opposite of a Nazi serves to reinforce his narrative that he is a champion of freedom and a defender against what he terms as leftist overreach.
**Interviewer:** Harris has claimed that Trump poses a significant risk and even called him “unstable” at a recent event. How does this dynamic influence the political landscape as we approach the elections?
**Jane Smith:** The heightened rhetoric reflects the increasing polarization in American politics. Kamala Harris’s assertions about Trump are aimed at framing him as a serious threat to democracy, particularly as we see rising extremism in certain factions. Her comments resonate with voters who are concerned about the implications of his potential return to power. This confrontation effectively heightens the stakes of the election, distinguishing it from the previous cycles in 2016 and 2020.
**Interviewer:** There are claims that this election is particularly critical, with certain states being pivotal. What should voters keep in mind as they head to the polls?
**Jane Smith:** Voters must grasp that their selections in key states like Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania could decisively shape the future of governance in the U.S. Every vote matters, especially in such a contentious environment. There’s a sense of urgency surrounding these elections due to the stakes involved—not only for policy but for the direction of democratic norms in the country.
**Interviewer:** Trump remarked that “this time, there will be no one there to stop it,” referring to his potential actions in office. How should we interpret that?
**Jane Smith:** That statement raises eyebrows and reflects concerns about accountability. It suggests a belief that if he were to regain power, he might act without the checks and balances that traditionally constrain presidents. This notion of being ‘immune’ from repercussions could resonate with many voters who fear the erosion of democratic institutions. It adds another layer to the overall narrative of potential authoritarianism that both parties are grappling with during this election cycle.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights, Jane. It appears we’re heading for a monumental election, with implications that could extend beyond immediate political outcomes.
**Jane Smith:** Absolutely, it’s crucial for all voters to engage in this process thoughtfully and to consider the broader ramifications of their choices. Thanks for the conversation!
