ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
**What impact might Trump’s response to Harris’s accusations have on his voter base?**
**Interview with Political Analyst on the Recent Trump-Harris Exchange**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. The political climate is heating up as we approach the elections. Recently, former President Donald Trump responded to Vice President Kamala Harris’s accusations of fascism and admiration for Adolf Hitler by stating, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” What do you think is the significance of his response?
**Political Analyst:** It’s a significant statement for several reasons. First, Trump’s categorical denial not only addresses the accusations but also serves as a strategic move to resonate with his base, which is deeply concerned about being labeled extremist. By positioning himself as “the opposite of a Nazi,” he attempts to frame the debate and deflect criticisms that could damage his candidacy.
**Interviewer:** Harris mentioned that Trump is a danger and labeled him as “even more unstable and more unhinged.” How do these characterizations impact the election landscape?
**Political Analyst:** Such labels can be double-edged swords. For Harris and the Democrats, it’s an attempt to galvanize their base by painting Trump as a serious threat to democracy. This kind of rhetoric can motivate voters who feel anxious about Trump’s potential return to power. However, it can also risk alienating moderates who may find the language extreme or overblown. Ultimately, both parties are trying to frame the narrative in a way that aligns with their electoral strategies.
**Interviewer:** Trump stated that there would be “no one there to stop it,” referencing concerns regarding the Supreme Court’s potential to intervene in future presidential actions. How do you interpret this statement?
**Political Analyst:** Trump’s assertion reveals a couple of key points. First, he’s tapping into the fears surrounding unchecked power within the executive branch. This aligns with broader concerns many voters have about authoritarianism and the rule of law. By signaling that the Supreme Court may not be a reliable check on his power, especially given past rulings, he potentially stirs apprehension among the electorate about what a second Trump presidency might entail.
**Interviewer:** As we approach the elections, how do you see these personal attacks and character disputes affecting voter turnout?
**Political Analyst:** The escalation of personal attacks is typical in heated races, but it’s critical that both sides focus on substantive issues as well. While personal battles can energize core supporters, they might also lead to disengagement among voters who prefer a discussion of policy over personalities. Ultimately, the impact on voter turnout will depend on which narrative resonates more strongly—fear of a return to Trump’s presidency or frustration with the divisive political climate.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights. It’s clear that these exchanges will play a critical role in shaping the upcoming elections.
**Political Analyst:** Thank you for having me. It’s going to be an interesting few days leading up to the election!
