ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
How do Trump’s responses to Harris’s accusations reflect broader trends in modern political rhetoric?
**Interview with Political Analyst Jane Smith on Recent Comments from Donald Trump and Kamala Harris**
**Interviewer:** Welcome, Jane. Recently, Donald Trump responded to accusations from Kamala Harris, saying “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” Can you elaborate on the backdrop of this statement?
**Jane Smith:** Thank you for having me. Trump’s comments were in direct response to Harris’s allegations that he admires authoritarian figures, suggesting a dangerous trend in his governance style. This exchange is part of a broader narrative where both candidates are intensifying their attacks in the lead-up to the presidential elections.
**Interviewer:** Harris stated that Trump is “even more unstable” and wants “power without control.” How does this framing affect public perception?
**Jane Smith:** It reinforces the narrative among Democratic supporters that Trump poses a significant threat to democratic norms. By framing him as unstable and authoritarian, Harris aims to rally voters around the idea that the stakes of this election are higher than in previous cycles. This could mobilize her base and influence undecided voters who may be wary of extremism.
**Interviewer:** Trump argues that these personal attacks are common in today’s political climate. Do you think this is valid, or is it unique to this election cycle?
**Jane Smith:** While personal attacks are not new in politics, the level of intensity and the context surrounding them—particularly with Trump’s previous presidency and ongoing legal battles—makes this cycle unique. The accusations of fascism and authoritarianism carry historical weight, and how voters interpret these attacks will be crucial.
**Interviewer:** How do you see this narrative playing out as we approach the election?
**Jane Smith:** Expect both parties to sharpen their rhetoric. Republicans will likely defend Trump’s character and portrayal of his policies, while Democrats will continue to paint him as a threat to democratic values. The narratives developed in these final days will significantly influence voter turnout and decision-making at the polls.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Jane, for your insights. It’s clear that as the election approaches, the stakes feel particularly high for both parties.
**Jane Smith:** Absolutely, and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss these critical issues.
