ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
How is Kamala Harris’s recent rhetoric about Donald Trump shaping the political landscape ahead of the 2024 elections?
**Interview with Political Analyst on Recent Comments Between Trump and Harris**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today. As we approach the upcoming presidential elections, the political climate seems more charged than ever. Recently, former President Donald Trump strongly rebutted Vice President Kamala Harris’s comments about him admiring Hitler. What are your thoughts on this exchange?
**Analyst:** Thank you for having me. This exchange highlights the increasing intensity of political rhetoric as we near the elections. Trump’s insistence that he is “not a Nazi” and his efforts to distance himself from such strong accusations reflect the high stakes that both parties perceive in this election cycle. The claims being made are quite severe, and they serve to mobilize voters on both sides.
**Interviewer:** Harris has stated that Trump poses a significant danger and that these elections differ from those in 2016 and 2020. How significant is this shift in tone?
**Analyst:** Harris’s remarks suggest a greater sense of urgency and a strategic pivot. She’s framing the current elections as pivotal, not just for their respective parties but for the future direction of the country. This kind of rhetoric aims to tap into a sense of fear and mobilization among voters who may feel that democracy is at risk. It sets the stage for more intense campaigning, as both candidates must position themselves as the safer choice.
**Interviewer:** During his rebuttal, Trump described himself as “the opposite of a Nazi.” How effective do you think this defense will be among his supporters and undecided voters?
**Analyst:** Trump’s defense may resonate well with his base, which sees him as a victim of politically motivated attacks. However, for undecided voters or those leaning toward Harris, this response may not be sufficient to alleviate concerns about his temperament and leadership style. Harris’s remarks about Trump being “unstable” and wanting power “without control” suggest a broader critique that might stick with voters who prioritize stability and democratic norms.
**Interviewer:** It seems that the performances in battleground states will be critical. What impact do you think this confrontation will have on key states like Michigan, Georgia, and Arizona?
**Analyst:** Absolutely, these battleground states are crucial, and both candidates will likely double down on their messaging there. Trump’s approach will appeal to his core supporters who value strong, outspoken leadership. Conversely, Democrats will use Harris’s comments to rally those who are concerned about Trump’s past behavior and future intentions. The effectiveness of their messaging in these states could very well determine the election outcome.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights. It’s sure to be a dramatic lead-up to the elections!
**Analyst:** My pleasure! It will be fascinating to see how this narrative develops in the coming days.
