ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
What motivated Vice President Harris to compare Trump to Nazi imagery in her recent remarks?
**Interview with Political Analyst John Smith on Recent Trump and Harris Remarks**
**Interviewer**: Thank you for joining us today, John. We recently saw a heated exchange between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Can you give us a brief overview of what happened?
**John Smith**: Absolutely. During a speech in Powder Springs, Georgia, Trump vehemently defended himself against accusations of being a Nazi or fascist, which Harris and other critics have levied against him. He stated quite emphatically, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi.” This comes ahead of the upcoming elections, where tensions are particularly high.
**Interviewer**: What do you think prompted Harris’s comments about Trump admiring Hitler’s generals?
**John Smith**: Harris’s remarks are part of a broader strategy from Democrats to paint Trump as a significant threat to democracy. She argues that his behavior and rhetoric have become increasingly unstable and that he is seeking power without accountability. It’s an assertion aimed at galvanizing voters who may be concerned about the implications of a Trump presidency.
**Interviewer**: How have these personal attacks influenced the election landscape?
**John Smith**: Personal attacks like these have become commonplace, especially as we approach what many consider one of the most contentious elections in recent history. Both parties are ramping up their rhetoric to mobilize their bases. It highlights the stakes of this election cycle, as many Americans feel deeply divided over the choices presented to them.
**Interviewer**: Trump also mentioned that there would be “no one there to stop it,” in reference to his potential power if re-elected. What did he mean by this?
**John Smith**: Trump is likely referring to the belief that if he were to win, he would operate with impunity. He cited Supreme Court rulings that suggest he could act without facing repercussions. This rhetoric fuels the narrative of extremism that Harris has put forth, suggesting that not only is he a danger, but that the institutions meant to contain such power might not function as they should.
**Interviewer**: Lastly, with only days left until the election, how do you see the dynamics playing out between these two candidates?
**John Smith**: The dynamics are tense, and both candidates are leveraging their communication strategies aggressively. Voter turnout will be pivotal, and the narratives they craft in these final days will play a crucial role in shaping public perception. Ultimately, it will come down to who can better convince the electorate of their vision for the future.
**Interviewer**: Thank you, John, for your insights on this developing story.
**John Smith**: Thank you for having me. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds as we approach Election Day.
