ATLANTA, Georgia, United States.— “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” The former president and Republican candidate for re-election, Donald Trump, said yesterday to defend himself against those who accuse him of being “fascist” and wanting to govern the United States in an authoritarian manner if he wins the presidential elections in eight days.
Los personal attacks have become the norm in the final stretch of the closest elections in the contemporary history of the United States, reports the France Press agency.
The vice president and Democratic candidate Kamala Harris insists that her rival, former President Trump, is a danger.
These elections are not those of 2016 or 2020 because “there is a lot at stake,” he maintains.
TO UNDERSTAND BETTER: Kamala Harris warns that Donald Trump admires Hitler’s generals
Trump “is even more unstable and more unhinged”and now “he wants power without control,” declared yesterday at an event in Michigan, one of the seven states that can decide the electoral result along with Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Nevada.
“And this time, There will be no one there to stop it, not even the Supreme Courtwho months ago told the former president that he is essentially immune no matter what he does in the White House,” he added, days after calling him a “fascist.”
“I’m not a Nazi,” Trump responds to Kamala for saying he admires Hitler’s generals
Trump has called migrants “murderers” and “terrorists” and says that “they poison the blood of the country,” but denied that he aspires to become an authoritarian leader in the style of “Hitler.”
“The new line of Kamala (Harris) and her campaign is that everyone who does not vote for her is Nazis, we are Nazis,” he said before a passionate crowd in Atlanta.
Trump He said his father used to tell him never to use the word nazi in Hitler and criticized Democrats for using both.
“He is Hitler and then they say he is a Nazi. “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” he said in Georgia.
A few days ago his former chief of staff in the White House, John Kelly, declared to the “New York Times” that Trump fits the definition of a fascist and that he told him that Adolf Hitler “also did some good things.”
Kamala Harris has given credence to the statements of Kelly, a former Marine general, and has accused Trump of admiring “dictators.”
On Sunday, a new controversy broke out over racist comments made by a comedian at a Republican rally.
Related
#Nazi #Trump #responds #Kamala #calling #admirer #Hitlers #generals
How is the rhetoric surrounding Trump and Harris indicative of the political polarization leading up to the election?
**Interview with Political Analyst on Trump’s Recent Statements and Election Landscape**
**Interviewer**: Welcome, and thank you for joining us today. We’ve seen a lot of heated rhetoric in the lead-up to the elections, especially involving former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. Most recently, Trump insisted, “I am not a Nazi, I am the opposite of a Nazi,” in response to accusations about his admiration for historical authoritarian figures. What are your thoughts on Trump’s defence?
**Analyst**: Thank you for having me. Trump’s statement is quite telling of his strategy to distance himself from extremist labels. In a charged political environment, calling oneself ”the opposite of a Nazi” is both a defensive and a preemptive move to ensure his base remains solidly behind him. It’s crucial for him to reject these labels vigorously, especially when facing a narrative that describes him as unstable or authoritarian.
**Interviewer**: Kamala Harris has claimed that Trump poses a serious danger and expressed concern about his potential for authoritarian rule if he wins. How does this reflect the current climate of political discourse?
**Analyst**: The political discourse this election cycle is undoubtedly more intense than in previous elections. The stakes are perceived as higher, and both candidates are resorting to strong personal attacks. Harris’s comments highlight how the Democratic side is framing Trump not just as a political opponent, but as a threat to democracy itself. This kind of rhetoric is designed to motivate voters by creating a sense of urgency about the election.
**Interviewer**: You mentioned intensity; Trump was described as “even more unstable and more unhinged” by Harris. What impact does such language have on the electorate?
**Analyst**: Such descriptors can energize the base on both sides. For Democrats, it galvanizes supporters who fear Trump’s leadership. Conversely, for Trump’s base, it can reinforce their view of him as an outsider who is fighting against the so-called establishment. The language used by both sides is part of a broader strategy to frame their opponent as not just wrong, but dangerous.
**Interviewer**: Trump’s comments come just days before the election, and he has emphasized that this election is different from 2016 or 2020. What should we expect in the coming days as the elections approach?
**Analyst**: The final days before the election are critical. We can expect a surge in mobilization efforts, targeted messaging, and even more aggressive rhetoric. Both campaigns will likely double down on their messages, trying to sway undecided voters. The focus will be on key battleground states, as they are crucial for winning the electoral college.
**Interviewer**: Thank you for your insights. As we move closer to the election, it will be interesting to see how these narratives evolve and impact voter turnout.
**Analyst**: Absolutely. It all comes down to how effectively each campaign can communicate its message and resonate with voters in this polarized landscape. Thank you for having me.
